All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:57:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210313215747.GA2394467@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204165831.2703772-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

[+cc Krzysztof, Pali, Oliver]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims
> the region") /dev/kmem zaps ptes when the kernel requests exclusive
> acccess to an iomem region. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM, this is
> the default for all driver uses.
> 
> Except there's two more ways to access PCI BARs: sysfs and proc mmap
> support. Let's plug that hole.

IIUC, the idea is that if a driver calls request_mem_region() on a PCI
BAR, we prevent access to the BAR via sysfs.  I guess I'm OK with that
if it's a real security improvement or something.

But the downside of this implementation is that it depends on
iomem_get_mapping(), which doesn't work until after fs_initcalls,
which means the sysfs files cannot be static attributes of devices
added before that.  PCI devices are typically enumerated in
subsys_initcall.

Krzysztof is converting PCI sysfs files (config, rom, reset, vpd, etc)
to static attributes.  This is a major improvement that could get rid
of pci_create_sysfs_dev_files(), the late_initcall pci_sysfs_init(),
and the "sysfs_initialized" hack.  This would fix a race reported by
Pali [1] (thanks to Oliver for the idea [2]).

EXCEPT that this revoke change means the "resource%d", "legacy_io",
and "legacy_mem" files cannot be static attributes because of
iomem_get_mapping().

Any ideas on how to deal with this?  Having to keep the
pci_sysfs_init() initcall just for these few files seems like the tail
wagging the dog.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200716110423.xtfyb3n6tn5ixedh@pali
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAOSf1CHss03DBSDO4PmTtMp0tCEu5kScn704ZEwLKGXQzBfqaA@mail.gmail.com

> For revoke_devmem() to work we need to link our vma into the same
> address_space, with consistent vma->vm_pgoff. ->pgoff is already
> adjusted, because that's how (io_)remap_pfn_range works, but for the
> mapping we need to adjust vma->vm_file->f_mapping. The cleanest way is
> to adjust this at at ->open time:
> 
> - for sysfs this is easy, now that binary attributes support this. We
>   just set bin_attr->mapping when mmap is supported
> - for procfs it's a bit more tricky, since procfs pci access has only
>   one file per device, and access to a specific resources first needs
>   to be set up with some ioctl calls. But mmap is only supported for
>   the same resources as sysfs exposes with mmap support, and otherwise
>   rejected, so we can set the mapping unconditionally at open time
>   without harm.
> 
> A special consideration is for arch_can_pci_mmap_io() - we need to
> make sure that the ->f_mapping doesn't alias between ioport and iomem
> space. There's only 2 ways in-tree to support mmap of ioports: generic
> pci mmap (ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE), and sparc as the single
> architecture hand-rolling. Both approach support ioport mmap through a
> special pfn range and not through magic pte attributes. Aliasing is
> therefore not a problem.
> 
> The only difference in access checks left is that sysfs PCI mmap does
> not check for CAP_RAWIO. I'm not really sure whether that should be
> added or not.
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/proc.c      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 0c45b4f7b214..f8afd54ca3e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_io;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_io);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -954,6 +955,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
>  	b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_mem);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -1169,6 +1171,8 @@ static int pci_create_attr(struct pci_dev *pdev, int num, int write_combine)
>  			res_attr->mmap = pci_mmap_resource_uc;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (res_attr->mmap)
> +		res_attr->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	res_attr->attr.name = res_attr_name;
>  	res_attr->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	res_attr->size = pci_resource_len(pdev, num);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> index 3a2f90beb4cb..9bab07302bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ static int proc_bus_pci_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	fpriv->write_combine = 0;
>  
>  	file->private_data = fpriv;
> +	file->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:57:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210313215747.GA2394467@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204165831.2703772-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

[+cc Krzysztof, Pali, Oliver]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims
> the region") /dev/kmem zaps ptes when the kernel requests exclusive
> acccess to an iomem region. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM, this is
> the default for all driver uses.
> 
> Except there's two more ways to access PCI BARs: sysfs and proc mmap
> support. Let's plug that hole.

IIUC, the idea is that if a driver calls request_mem_region() on a PCI
BAR, we prevent access to the BAR via sysfs.  I guess I'm OK with that
if it's a real security improvement or something.

But the downside of this implementation is that it depends on
iomem_get_mapping(), which doesn't work until after fs_initcalls,
which means the sysfs files cannot be static attributes of devices
added before that.  PCI devices are typically enumerated in
subsys_initcall.

Krzysztof is converting PCI sysfs files (config, rom, reset, vpd, etc)
to static attributes.  This is a major improvement that could get rid
of pci_create_sysfs_dev_files(), the late_initcall pci_sysfs_init(),
and the "sysfs_initialized" hack.  This would fix a race reported by
Pali [1] (thanks to Oliver for the idea [2]).

EXCEPT that this revoke change means the "resource%d", "legacy_io",
and "legacy_mem" files cannot be static attributes because of
iomem_get_mapping().

Any ideas on how to deal with this?  Having to keep the
pci_sysfs_init() initcall just for these few files seems like the tail
wagging the dog.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200716110423.xtfyb3n6tn5ixedh@pali
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAOSf1CHss03DBSDO4PmTtMp0tCEu5kScn704ZEwLKGXQzBfqaA@mail.gmail.com

> For revoke_devmem() to work we need to link our vma into the same
> address_space, with consistent vma->vm_pgoff. ->pgoff is already
> adjusted, because that's how (io_)remap_pfn_range works, but for the
> mapping we need to adjust vma->vm_file->f_mapping. The cleanest way is
> to adjust this at at ->open time:
> 
> - for sysfs this is easy, now that binary attributes support this. We
>   just set bin_attr->mapping when mmap is supported
> - for procfs it's a bit more tricky, since procfs pci access has only
>   one file per device, and access to a specific resources first needs
>   to be set up with some ioctl calls. But mmap is only supported for
>   the same resources as sysfs exposes with mmap support, and otherwise
>   rejected, so we can set the mapping unconditionally at open time
>   without harm.
> 
> A special consideration is for arch_can_pci_mmap_io() - we need to
> make sure that the ->f_mapping doesn't alias between ioport and iomem
> space. There's only 2 ways in-tree to support mmap of ioports: generic
> pci mmap (ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE), and sparc as the single
> architecture hand-rolling. Both approach support ioport mmap through a
> special pfn range and not through magic pte attributes. Aliasing is
> therefore not a problem.
> 
> The only difference in access checks left is that sysfs PCI mmap does
> not check for CAP_RAWIO. I'm not really sure whether that should be
> added or not.
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/proc.c      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 0c45b4f7b214..f8afd54ca3e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_io;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_io);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -954,6 +955,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
>  	b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_mem);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -1169,6 +1171,8 @@ static int pci_create_attr(struct pci_dev *pdev, int num, int write_combine)
>  			res_attr->mmap = pci_mmap_resource_uc;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (res_attr->mmap)
> +		res_attr->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	res_attr->attr.name = res_attr_name;
>  	res_attr->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	res_attr->size = pci_resource_len(pdev, num);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> index 3a2f90beb4cb..9bab07302bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ static int proc_bus_pci_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	fpriv->write_combine = 0;
>  
>  	file->private_data = fpriv;
> +	file->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:57:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210313215747.GA2394467@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204165831.2703772-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

[+cc Krzysztof, Pali, Oliver]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims
> the region") /dev/kmem zaps ptes when the kernel requests exclusive
> acccess to an iomem region. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM, this is
> the default for all driver uses.
> 
> Except there's two more ways to access PCI BARs: sysfs and proc mmap
> support. Let's plug that hole.

IIUC, the idea is that if a driver calls request_mem_region() on a PCI
BAR, we prevent access to the BAR via sysfs.  I guess I'm OK with that
if it's a real security improvement or something.

But the downside of this implementation is that it depends on
iomem_get_mapping(), which doesn't work until after fs_initcalls,
which means the sysfs files cannot be static attributes of devices
added before that.  PCI devices are typically enumerated in
subsys_initcall.

Krzysztof is converting PCI sysfs files (config, rom, reset, vpd, etc)
to static attributes.  This is a major improvement that could get rid
of pci_create_sysfs_dev_files(), the late_initcall pci_sysfs_init(),
and the "sysfs_initialized" hack.  This would fix a race reported by
Pali [1] (thanks to Oliver for the idea [2]).

EXCEPT that this revoke change means the "resource%d", "legacy_io",
and "legacy_mem" files cannot be static attributes because of
iomem_get_mapping().

Any ideas on how to deal with this?  Having to keep the
pci_sysfs_init() initcall just for these few files seems like the tail
wagging the dog.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200716110423.xtfyb3n6tn5ixedh@pali
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAOSf1CHss03DBSDO4PmTtMp0tCEu5kScn704ZEwLKGXQzBfqaA@mail.gmail.com

> For revoke_devmem() to work we need to link our vma into the same
> address_space, with consistent vma->vm_pgoff. ->pgoff is already
> adjusted, because that's how (io_)remap_pfn_range works, but for the
> mapping we need to adjust vma->vm_file->f_mapping. The cleanest way is
> to adjust this at at ->open time:
> 
> - for sysfs this is easy, now that binary attributes support this. We
>   just set bin_attr->mapping when mmap is supported
> - for procfs it's a bit more tricky, since procfs pci access has only
>   one file per device, and access to a specific resources first needs
>   to be set up with some ioctl calls. But mmap is only supported for
>   the same resources as sysfs exposes with mmap support, and otherwise
>   rejected, so we can set the mapping unconditionally at open time
>   without harm.
> 
> A special consideration is for arch_can_pci_mmap_io() - we need to
> make sure that the ->f_mapping doesn't alias between ioport and iomem
> space. There's only 2 ways in-tree to support mmap of ioports: generic
> pci mmap (ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE), and sparc as the single
> architecture hand-rolling. Both approach support ioport mmap through a
> special pfn range and not through magic pte attributes. Aliasing is
> therefore not a problem.
> 
> The only difference in access checks left is that sysfs PCI mmap does
> not check for CAP_RAWIO. I'm not really sure whether that should be
> added or not.
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/proc.c      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 0c45b4f7b214..f8afd54ca3e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_io;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_io);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -954,6 +955,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
>  	b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_mem);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -1169,6 +1171,8 @@ static int pci_create_attr(struct pci_dev *pdev, int num, int write_combine)
>  			res_attr->mmap = pci_mmap_resource_uc;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (res_attr->mmap)
> +		res_attr->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	res_attr->attr.name = res_attr_name;
>  	res_attr->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	res_attr->size = pci_resource_len(pdev, num);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> index 3a2f90beb4cb..9bab07302bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ static int proc_bus_pci_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	fpriv->write_combine = 0;
>  
>  	file->private_data = fpriv;
> +	file->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-13 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-04 16:58 [PATCH 0/2] pci sysfs file iomem revoke support Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: also set up legacy files only after sysfs init Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 21:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-04 21:50     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-04 21:50     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-04 22:24     ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-04 22:24       ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-05  9:59       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05  9:59         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05 10:04         ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-05 10:04           ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-05 10:16           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05 10:16             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05 10:21             ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-05 10:21               ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-05  9:23     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05  9:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05  9:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-10 22:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-10 22:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-10 22:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-03-13 21:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-03-13 21:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-03-13 21:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-03-13 22:36     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-13 22:36       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-13 22:36       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-07 19:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] pci sysfs file iomem revoke support Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-07 19:43   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-07 19:43   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210313215747.GA2394467@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.