All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	android-kvm@google.com, seanjc@google.com, mate.toth-pal@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, tabba@google.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/36] KVM: arm64: Provide __flush_dcache_area at EL2
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:33:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315163322.GE3430@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315143536.214621-15-qperret@google.com>

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:35:14PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> We will need to do cache maintenance at EL2 soon, so compile a copy of
> __flush_dcache_area at EL2, and provide a copy of arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0
> as it is needed by the read_ctr macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile        |  3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S         | 13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c               |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> index 3fd9f60d2180..efba1b89b8a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> @@ -13,3 +13,5 @@
>  #define KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(name) extern struct arm64_ftr_reg kvm_nvhe_sym(name)
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +
> +KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0);

I still think this is a bit weird. If you really want to macro-ise stuff,
then why not follow the sort of thing we do for e.g. per-cpu variables and
have separate DECLARE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG and DEFINE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG macros.

That way kvm_cpufeature.h can have header guards like a normal header and
we can drop the '#ifndef KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG' altogether. I don't think
the duplication of the symbol name really matters -- it should fail at
build time if something is missing.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: android-kvm@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	mate.toth-pal@arm.com, seanjc@google.com, tabba@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maz@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/36] KVM: arm64: Provide __flush_dcache_area at EL2
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:33:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315163322.GE3430@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315143536.214621-15-qperret@google.com>

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:35:14PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> We will need to do cache maintenance at EL2 soon, so compile a copy of
> __flush_dcache_area at EL2, and provide a copy of arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0
> as it is needed by the read_ctr macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile        |  3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S         | 13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c               |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> index 3fd9f60d2180..efba1b89b8a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> @@ -13,3 +13,5 @@
>  #define KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(name) extern struct arm64_ftr_reg kvm_nvhe_sym(name)
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +
> +KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0);

I still think this is a bit weird. If you really want to macro-ise stuff,
then why not follow the sort of thing we do for e.g. per-cpu variables and
have separate DECLARE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG and DEFINE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG macros.

That way kvm_cpufeature.h can have header guards like a normal header and
we can drop the '#ifndef KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG' altogether. I don't think
the duplication of the symbol name really matters -- it should fail at
build time if something is missing.

Will
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	android-kvm@google.com, seanjc@google.com, mate.toth-pal@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, tabba@google.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/36] KVM: arm64: Provide __flush_dcache_area at EL2
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:33:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315163322.GE3430@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315143536.214621-15-qperret@google.com>

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:35:14PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> We will need to do cache maintenance at EL2 soon, so compile a copy of
> __flush_dcache_area at EL2, and provide a copy of arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0
> as it is needed by the read_ctr macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile        |  3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S         | 13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c               |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> index 3fd9f60d2180..efba1b89b8a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h
> @@ -13,3 +13,5 @@
>  #define KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(name) extern struct arm64_ftr_reg kvm_nvhe_sym(name)
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +
> +KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0);

I still think this is a bit weird. If you really want to macro-ise stuff,
then why not follow the sort of thing we do for e.g. per-cpu variables and
have separate DECLARE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG and DEFINE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG macros.

That way kvm_cpufeature.h can have header guards like a normal header and
we can drop the '#ifndef KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG' altogether. I don't think
the duplication of the symbol name really matters -- it should fail at
build time if something is missing.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-15 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 180+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-15 14:35 [PATCH v5 00/36] KVM: arm64: A stage 2 for the host Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 01/36] arm64: lib: Annotate {clear,copy}_page() as position-independent Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` [PATCH v5 01/36] arm64: lib: Annotate {clear, copy}_page() " Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 02/36] KVM: arm64: Link position-independent string routines into .hyp.text Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 03/36] arm64: kvm: Add standalone ticket spinlock implementation for use at hyp Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 04/36] KVM: arm64: Initialize kvm_nvhe_init_params early Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/36] KVM: arm64: Avoid free_page() in page-table allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/36] KVM: arm64: Factor memory allocation out of pgtable.c Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/36] KVM: arm64: Introduce a BSS section for use at Hyp Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 08/36] KVM: arm64: Make kvm_call_hyp() a function call " Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/36] KVM: arm64: Allow using kvm_nvhe_sym() in hyp code Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/36] KVM: arm64: Introduce an early Hyp page allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/36] KVM: arm64: Stub CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST at Hyp Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 12/36] KVM: arm64: Introduce a Hyp buddy page allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 13/36] KVM: arm64: Enable access to sanitized CPU features at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 14/36] KVM: arm64: Provide __flush_dcache_area " Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:33   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-03-15 16:33     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:33     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:56     ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:56       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:56       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 17:03       ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 17:03         ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 17:03         ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 15/36] KVM: arm64: Factor out vector address calculation Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 16/36] arm64: asm: Provide set_sctlr_el2 macro Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 17/36] KVM: arm64: Prepare the creation of s1 mappings at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 18/36] KVM: arm64: Elevate hypervisor mappings creation " Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 19/36] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch for stage 2 pgtable Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 20/36] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch in kvm_s2_mmu Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 21/36] KVM: arm64: Set host stage 2 using kvm_nvhe_init_params Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 22/36] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_setup_stage2() Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 23/36] KVM: arm64: Refactor __load_guest_stage2() Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 24/36] KVM: arm64: Refactor __populate_fault_info() Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 25/36] KVM: arm64: Make memcache anonymous in pgtable allocator Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 26/36] KVM: arm64: Reserve memory for host stage 2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 27/36] KVM: arm64: Sort the hypervisor memblocks Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 28/36] KVM: arm64: Always zero invalid PTEs Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 29/36] KVM: arm64: Use page-table to track page ownership Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:36   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:36     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:36     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:53     ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:53       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:53       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 17:01       ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 17:01         ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 17:01         ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 30/36] KVM: arm64: Refactor the *_map_set_prot_attr() helpers Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 31/36] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_find_range() Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:31   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:31     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:31     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 32/36] KVM: arm64: Provide sanitized mmfr* registers at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 16:31   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:31     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 16:31     ` Will Deacon
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 33/36] KVM: arm64: Wrap the host with a stage 2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 12:28   ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-16 12:28     ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-16 12:28     ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-16 12:53     ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 12:53       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 12:53       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 14:29       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 14:29         ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 14:29         ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 15:16         ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-16 15:16           ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-16 15:16           ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-16 17:46           ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 17:46             ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-16 17:46             ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17  8:41             ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-17  8:41               ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-17  8:41               ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-17  9:02               ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17  9:02                 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17  9:02                 ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:57                 ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-17 14:57                   ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-17 14:57                   ` Mate Toth-Pal
2021-03-17 14:17   ` [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for FWB Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17     ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17     ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17     ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_PGTABLE_S2_NOFWB Stage-2 flag Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-17 14:41         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-17 14:41         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-17 14:47         ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:47           ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:47           ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:42       ` Will Deacon
2021-03-17 14:42         ` Will Deacon
2021-03-17 14:42         ` Will Deacon
2021-03-17 14:51         ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:51           ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:51           ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17     ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: Disable FWB in host stage-2 Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-17 14:17       ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 34/36] KVM: arm64: Page-align the .hyp sections Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 35/36] KVM: arm64: Disable PMU support in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35 ` [PATCH v5 36/36] KVM: arm64: Protect the .hyp sections from the host Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret
2021-03-15 14:35   ` Quentin Perret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210315163322.GE3430@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=android-kvm@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mate.toth-pal@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.