From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
kever.yang@rock-chips.com, tony.xie@rock-chips.com,
finley.xiao@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to json-schema
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:06:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326200626.GA3776228@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326103036.15173-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:30:36PM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to
> json-schema and move to the power bindings directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20210225102643.653095-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/
> ---
> .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml | 291 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 136 --------
> 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
My review checks tell me I already reviewed this and IIRC that was
pointed out to you in the last version. Am I supposed to review the
whole thing again or is it unchanged or ???. I have no idea with no
version history.
As there are other issues pointed out, I'm going with 'wait for the next
version'.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
kever.yang@rock-chips.com, tony.xie@rock-chips.com,
finley.xiao@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to json-schema
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:06:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326200626.GA3776228@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326103036.15173-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:30:36PM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to
> json-schema and move to the power bindings directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20210225102643.653095-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/
> ---
> .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml | 291 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 136 --------
> 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
My review checks tell me I already reviewed this and IIRC that was
pointed out to you in the last version. Am I supposed to review the
whole thing again or is it unchanged or ???. I have no idea with no
version history.
As there are other issues pointed out, I'm going with 'wait for the next
version'.
Rob
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
kever.yang@rock-chips.com, tony.xie@rock-chips.com,
finley.xiao@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to json-schema
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:06:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326200626.GA3776228@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326103036.15173-1-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:30:36PM +0800, Elaine Zhang wrote:
> Convert the soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt binding document to
> json-schema and move to the power bindings directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20210225102643.653095-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/
> ---
> .../power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml | 291 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 136 --------
> 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rockchip,power-controller.yaml
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
My review checks tell me I already reviewed this and IIRC that was
pointed out to you in the last version. Am I supposed to review the
whole thing again or is it unchanged or ???. I have no idea with no
version history.
As there are other issues pointed out, I'm going with 'wait for the next
version'.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 10:27 [PATCH v6 00/11] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add rk3568 powerdomains Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] arm: dts: rockchip: Fix power-controller node names for rk3066a Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] arm: dts: rockchip: Fix power-controller node names for rk3188 Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] arm: dts: rockchip: Fix power-controller node names for rk3288 Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix power-controller node names for px30 Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:27 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix power-controller node names for rk3328 Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:28 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:28 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:28 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix power-controller node names for rk3399 Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:28 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:28 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] soc: rockchip: pm-domains: Add a meaningful power domain name Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] dt-bindings: add power-domain header for RK3568 SoCs Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Convert to json-schema Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 11:43 ` Johan Jonker
2021-03-26 11:43 ` Johan Jonker
2021-03-26 11:43 ` Johan Jonker
2021-03-26 12:42 ` Johan Jonker
2021-03-26 12:42 ` Johan Jonker
2021-03-26 12:42 ` Johan Jonker
2021-03-26 20:06 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-03-26 20:06 ` Rob Herring
2021-03-26 20:06 ` Rob Herring
2021-03-26 10:30 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Add bindings for RK3568 Soc Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:30 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:31 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add rk3568 powerdomains Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:31 ` Elaine Zhang
2021-03-26 10:31 ` Elaine Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210326200626.GA3776228@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=finley.xiao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tony.xie@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.