From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: "Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
vtolkm@gmail.com, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Disallow retraining link for Atheros QCA98xx chips on non-Gen1 PCIe bridges
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210327173327.tfn4mjq3cvrq33qu@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210327154213.571aa263@dellmb.labs.office.nic.cz>
On Saturday 27 March 2021 15:42:13 Marek Behún wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 14:29:59 +0100
> Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > I can change this to 'if (!ret)' if needed, no problem.
> >
> > I use 'if (!val)' mostly for boolean and pointer variables. If
> > variable can contain more integer values then I lot of times I use
> > '=='.
>
> Comparing integer varibales with explicit literals is sensible, but
> if a function returning integer returns 0 on success and negative value
> on error, Linux kernel has a tradition of using just
> if (!ret)
> or
> if (ret)
>
> Marek
Ok, I will change it.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: "Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
vtolkm@gmail.com, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Disallow retraining link for Atheros QCA98xx chips on non-Gen1 PCIe bridges
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210327173327.tfn4mjq3cvrq33qu@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210327154213.571aa263@dellmb.labs.office.nic.cz>
On Saturday 27 March 2021 15:42:13 Marek Behún wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 14:29:59 +0100
> Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > I can change this to 'if (!ret)' if needed, no problem.
> >
> > I use 'if (!val)' mostly for boolean and pointer variables. If
> > variable can contain more integer values then I lot of times I use
> > '=='.
>
> Comparing integer varibales with explicit literals is sensible, but
> if a function returning integer returns 0 on success and negative value
> on error, Linux kernel has a tradition of using just
> if (!ret)
> or
> if (ret)
>
> Marek
Ok, I will change it.
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-27 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 12:43 [PATCH] PCI: Disallow retraining link for Atheros QCA98xx chips on non-Gen1 PCIe bridges Pali Rohár
2021-03-26 12:43 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-26 18:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-26 18:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-27 0:14 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-03-27 0:14 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-03-27 13:29 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-27 13:29 ` Pali Rohár
2021-03-27 14:42 ` Marek Behún
2021-03-27 14:42 ` Marek Behún
2021-03-27 17:33 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2021-03-27 17:33 ` Pali Rohár
2021-04-27 10:55 ` [PATCH v2] PCI: Disallow retraining link for Atheros " Pali Rohár
2021-04-27 10:55 ` Pali Rohár
2021-04-30 11:41 ` Pali Rohár
2021-04-30 11:41 ` Pali Rohár
2021-05-05 16:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Pali Rohár
2021-05-05 16:33 ` Pali Rohár
2021-05-11 20:39 ` Pali Rohár
2021-05-11 20:39 ` Pali Rohár
2021-05-28 0:08 ` Pali Rohár
2021-05-28 0:08 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-01 11:28 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-06-01 11:28 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-06-01 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-01 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-01 21:18 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-01 21:18 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-02 0:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-02 0:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-02 12:08 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-02 12:08 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-02 15:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-02 15:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-02 19:03 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-02 19:03 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-16 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-16 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-21 14:28 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-21 14:28 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-25 20:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-25 20:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-26 14:38 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-26 14:38 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-21 14:39 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-21 14:39 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-05 19:43 ` Jannis
2021-10-05 19:43 ` Jannis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210327173327.tfn4mjq3cvrq33qu@pali \
--to=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vtolkm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.