All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:59:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210401095908.GC1993499@BV030612LT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401054300.GD14052@work>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:13:00AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Add device tree node for ATC2603C PMIC and remove the 'fixed-3.1V'
> > dummy regulator used for the uSD supply.
> > 
> > Additionally, add 'SYSPWR' fixed regulator and provide cpu0 supply.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied to for-next after fixing the patch subject as below:
> 
> "ARM: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC"

I encountered commits with both "ARM: dts:" and "arm: dts:" prefixes,
so I wasn't sure if there is a preferred format.

I have just counted the no. of occurrences in git log for both variants
and it seems the former is indeed more common, so I will make sure to
use "ARM: ..." from now on.

Thanks for noticing this,
Cristi

> Thanks,
> Mani

[...]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:59:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210401095908.GC1993499@BV030612LT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401054300.GD14052@work>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:13:00AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Add device tree node for ATC2603C PMIC and remove the 'fixed-3.1V'
> > dummy regulator used for the uSD supply.
> > 
> > Additionally, add 'SYSPWR' fixed regulator and provide cpu0 supply.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> 
> Applied to for-next after fixing the patch subject as below:
> 
> "ARM: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC"

I encountered commits with both "ARM: dts:" and "arm: dts:" prefixes,
so I wasn't sure if there is a preferred format.

I have just counted the no. of occurrences in git log for both variants
and it seems the former is indeed more common, so I will make sure to
use "ARM: ..." from now on.

Thanks for noticing this,
Cristi

> Thanks,
> Mani

[...]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-12  9:49 [PATCH 1/1] arm: dts: owl-s500-roseapplepi: Add ATC2603C PMIC Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-12  9:49 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01  5:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01  5:29   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01  9:44   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01  9:44     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01  5:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01  5:43   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01  9:59   ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
2021-04-01  9:59     ` Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210401095908.GC1993499@BV030612LT \
    --to=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.