All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, <jmorris@namei.org>, <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	<casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] evm: Align evm_inode_init_security() definition with LSM infrastructure
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:04:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210415100435.18619-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415100435.18619-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

This patch changes the evm_inode_init_security() definition to align with
the LSM infrastructure, in preparation for moving IMA and EVM to that
infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/evm.h               | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 security/security.c               |  7 +++++--
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h
index 8cad46bcec9d..5d8b29d80296 100644
--- a/include/linux/evm.h
+++ b/include/linux/evm.h
@@ -34,9 +34,11 @@ extern int evm_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
 				 struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name);
 extern void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 				       const char *xattr_name);
-extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
-				   const struct xattr *xattr_array,
-				   struct xattr *evm);
+extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
+				   const struct qstr *qstr,
+				   const char **name,
+				   void **value, size_t *len,
+				   struct xattr *lsm_xattrs);
 extern bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
 extern int posix_xattr_acl(const char *xattrname);
@@ -102,11 +104,16 @@ static inline void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 	return;
 }
 
-static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
-					  const struct xattr *xattr_array,
-					  struct xattr *evm)
+static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
+					  const struct qstr *qstr,
+					  const char **name,
+					  void **value, size_t *len,
+					  struct xattr *lsm_xattrs)
 {
-	return 0;
+	if (!name || !value || !len || !lsm_xattrs)
+		return 0;
+
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
 static inline bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name)
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
index 84a9b7a69b1f..a5069d69a893 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
@@ -706,29 +706,35 @@ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid)
 /*
  * evm_inode_init_security - initializes security.evm HMAC value
  */
-int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
-				 const struct xattr *lsm_xattr,
-				 struct xattr *evm_xattr)
+int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
+			    const struct qstr *qstr,
+			    const char **name,
+			    void **value, size_t *len,
+			    struct xattr *lsm_xattrs)
 {
 	struct evm_xattr *xattr_data;
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) ||
-	    !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name))
+	if (!name || !value || !len || !lsm_xattrs)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) ||
+	    !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattrs->name))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!xattr_data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	xattr_data->data.type = EVM_XATTR_HMAC;
-	rc = evm_init_hmac(inode, lsm_xattr, xattr_data->digest);
+	rc = evm_init_hmac(inode, lsm_xattrs, xattr_data->digest);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	evm_xattr->value = xattr_data;
-	evm_xattr->value_len = hash_digest_size[evm_hash_algo] + 1;
-	evm_xattr->name = XATTR_EVM_SUFFIX;
+	*name = XATTR_EVM_SUFFIX;
+	*value = xattr_data;
+	*len = hash_digest_size[evm_hash_algo] + 1;
+
 	return 0;
 out:
 	kfree(xattr_data);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 8aabbc0f0dfc..e16ce150b111 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,11 @@ int security_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = evm_inode_init_security(inode, new_xattrs, lsm_xattr);
-	if (ret)
+	ret = evm_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr,
+				      &lsm_xattr->name,
+				      &lsm_xattr->value,
+				      &lsm_xattr->value_len, new_xattrs);
+	if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
 		goto out;
 	ret = initxattrs(inode, new_xattrs, fs_data);
 out:
-- 
2.26.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] evm: Align evm_inode_init_security() definition with LSM infrastructure
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:04:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210415100435.18619-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415100435.18619-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

This patch changes the evm_inode_init_security() definition to align with
the LSM infrastructure, in preparation for moving IMA and EVM to that
infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/evm.h               | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 security/security.c               |  7 +++++--
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h
index 8cad46bcec9d..5d8b29d80296 100644
--- a/include/linux/evm.h
+++ b/include/linux/evm.h
@@ -34,9 +34,11 @@ extern int evm_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
 				 struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name);
 extern void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 				       const char *xattr_name);
-extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
-				   const struct xattr *xattr_array,
-				   struct xattr *evm);
+extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
+				   const struct qstr *qstr,
+				   const char **name,
+				   void **value, size_t *len,
+				   struct xattr *lsm_xattrs);
 extern bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
 extern int posix_xattr_acl(const char *xattrname);
@@ -102,11 +104,16 @@ static inline void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 	return;
 }
 
-static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
-					  const struct xattr *xattr_array,
-					  struct xattr *evm)
+static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
+					  const struct qstr *qstr,
+					  const char **name,
+					  void **value, size_t *len,
+					  struct xattr *lsm_xattrs)
 {
-	return 0;
+	if (!name || !value || !len || !lsm_xattrs)
+		return 0;
+
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
 static inline bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name)
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
index 84a9b7a69b1f..a5069d69a893 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
@@ -706,29 +706,35 @@ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid)
 /*
  * evm_inode_init_security - initializes security.evm HMAC value
  */
-int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode,
-				 const struct xattr *lsm_xattr,
-				 struct xattr *evm_xattr)
+int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
+			    const struct qstr *qstr,
+			    const char **name,
+			    void **value, size_t *len,
+			    struct xattr *lsm_xattrs)
 {
 	struct evm_xattr *xattr_data;
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) ||
-	    !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name))
+	if (!name || !value || !len || !lsm_xattrs)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) ||
+	    !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattrs->name))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!xattr_data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	xattr_data->data.type = EVM_XATTR_HMAC;
-	rc = evm_init_hmac(inode, lsm_xattr, xattr_data->digest);
+	rc = evm_init_hmac(inode, lsm_xattrs, xattr_data->digest);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	evm_xattr->value = xattr_data;
-	evm_xattr->value_len = hash_digest_size[evm_hash_algo] + 1;
-	evm_xattr->name = XATTR_EVM_SUFFIX;
+	*name = XATTR_EVM_SUFFIX;
+	*value = xattr_data;
+	*len = hash_digest_size[evm_hash_algo] + 1;
+
 	return 0;
 out:
 	kfree(xattr_data);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 8aabbc0f0dfc..e16ce150b111 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,11 @@ int security_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = evm_inode_init_security(inode, new_xattrs, lsm_xattr);
-	if (ret)
+	ret = evm_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr,
+				      &lsm_xattr->name,
+				      &lsm_xattr->value,
+				      &lsm_xattr->value_len, new_xattrs);
+	if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
 		goto out;
 	ret = initxattrs(inode, new_xattrs, fs_data);
 out:
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 10:04 [PATCH 0/5] evm: Prepare for moving to the LSM infrastructure Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04 ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] xattr: Complete constify ->name member of "struct xattr" Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 11:20   ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-04-15 12:25     ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] security: Support multiple LSMs implementing the inode_init_security hook Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] security: Pass xattrs allocated by LSMs to " Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04 ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2021-04-15 10:04   ` [PATCH 4/5] evm: Align evm_inode_init_security() definition with LSM infrastructure Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] evm: Support multiple LSMs providing an xattr Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 10:04   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-15 20:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] evm: Prepare for moving to the LSM infrastructure Casey Schaufler
2021-04-16 16:37   ` Roberto Sassu
2021-04-16 21:25     ` Casey Schaufler
2021-04-20 16:09       ` Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210415100435.18619-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.