From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] clk: provide new devm helpers for prepared and enabled clocks
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422065726.1646742-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> (raw)
Hello,
the only change since v5 is that the fixed i2c patch is now properly
part of this series.
Can I please get a feedback by the clock maintainers? The series got
positive feedback by several people now and is still unreplied by by the
clk maintainers since October. Should I resend regularly, say once per
two weeks? How many digits do I have to consider for the resend counter?
At what point can I ask the maintainers further up in the chain to merge
my series? Does a pull request help?
Best regards
Uwe
Uwe Kleine-König (6):
clk: generalize devm_clk_get() a bit
clk: Provide new devm_clk_helpers for prepared and enabled clocks
pwm: atmel: Simplify using devm_clk_get_prepared()
rtc: at91sma9: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
i2c: imx: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enableded()
spi: davinci: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
drivers/clk/clk-devres.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 12 +----
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 15 +-----
drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 22 ++-------
drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c | 11 +----
include/linux/clk.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
base-commit: a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15
--
2.30.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] clk: provide new devm helpers for prepared and enabled clocks
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422065726.1646742-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> (raw)
Hello,
the only change since v5 is that the fixed i2c patch is now properly
part of this series.
Can I please get a feedback by the clock maintainers? The series got
positive feedback by several people now and is still unreplied by by the
clk maintainers since October. Should I resend regularly, say once per
two weeks? How many digits do I have to consider for the resend counter?
At what point can I ask the maintainers further up in the chain to merge
my series? Does a pull request help?
Best regards
Uwe
Uwe Kleine-König (6):
clk: generalize devm_clk_get() a bit
clk: Provide new devm_clk_helpers for prepared and enabled clocks
pwm: atmel: Simplify using devm_clk_get_prepared()
rtc: at91sma9: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
i2c: imx: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enableded()
spi: davinci: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled()
drivers/clk/clk-devres.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 12 +----
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 15 +-----
drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 22 ++-------
drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c | 11 +----
include/linux/clk.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
6 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
base-commit: a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 6:57 Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] clk: provide new devm helpers for prepared and enabled clocks Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] clk: generalize devm_clk_get() a bit Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] clk: Provide new devm_clk_helpers for prepared and enabled clocks Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] pwm: atmel: Simplify using devm_clk_get_prepared() Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] rtc: at91sma9: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled() Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 8:01 ` Alexander Dahl
2021-04-22 8:01 ` Alexander Dahl
2021-04-22 15:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 15:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] i2c: imx: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enableded() Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 16:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 16:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] spi: davinci: Simplify using devm_clk_get_enabled() Uwe Kleine-König
2021-04-22 6:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210422065726.1646742-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.