All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
	eparis@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: syscall.h: Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value for compat
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:55:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422165545.GE66392@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421174105.GB52940@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:41:05PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:55:32PM +0800, He Zhe wrote:
> > Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value so that it can
> > handle 32-bit compatible case and can be used by for example audit, just
> > like what syscall_get_error does.
> 
> If a compat syscall can ever legitimately return a non-error value with
> bit 31 set, and this sign-extends it, is that ever going to reach
> userspace as a 64-bit value?
> 
> IIUC things like mmap() can return pointers above 2GiB for a compat
> task, so I'm a bit uneasy that we'd handle those wrong. I can't see a
> way of preventing that unless we keep the upper 32 bits for errors.

Looking at this with fresh eyes, I think we can more closely mirror
syscall_get_error(), and do something like:

static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
					    struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	long val = regs->regs[0];
	long error = val;

	if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
		error = sign_extend64(error, 31);
	
	return IS_ERR_VALUE(error) ? error : val;
}

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Mark.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index cfc0672013f6..cd7a22787aeb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,12 @@ static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
> >  static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> >  					    struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -	return regs->regs[0];
> > +	long val = regs->regs[0];
> > +
> > +	if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
> > +		val = sign_extend64(val, 31);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: syscall.h: Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value for compat
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:55:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422165545.GE66392@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421174105.GB52940@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:41:05PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:55:32PM +0800, He Zhe wrote:
> > Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value so that it can
> > handle 32-bit compatible case and can be used by for example audit, just
> > like what syscall_get_error does.
> 
> If a compat syscall can ever legitimately return a non-error value with
> bit 31 set, and this sign-extends it, is that ever going to reach
> userspace as a 64-bit value?
> 
> IIUC things like mmap() can return pointers above 2GiB for a compat
> task, so I'm a bit uneasy that we'd handle those wrong. I can't see a
> way of preventing that unless we keep the upper 32 bits for errors.

Looking at this with fresh eyes, I think we can more closely mirror
syscall_get_error(), and do something like:

static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
					    struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	long val = regs->regs[0];
	long error = val;

	if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
		error = sign_extend64(error, 31);
	
	return IS_ERR_VALUE(error) ? error : val;
}

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Mark.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index cfc0672013f6..cd7a22787aeb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,12 @@ static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
> >  static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> >  					    struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -	return regs->regs[0];
> > +	long val = regs->regs[0];
> > +
> > +	if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
> > +		val = sign_extend64(val, 31);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
	eparis@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: syscall.h: Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value for compat
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:55:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422165545.GE66392@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210421174105.GB52940@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:41:05PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:55:32PM +0800, He Zhe wrote:
> > Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value so that it can
> > handle 32-bit compatible case and can be used by for example audit, just
> > like what syscall_get_error does.
> 
> If a compat syscall can ever legitimately return a non-error value with
> bit 31 set, and this sign-extends it, is that ever going to reach
> userspace as a 64-bit value?
> 
> IIUC things like mmap() can return pointers above 2GiB for a compat
> task, so I'm a bit uneasy that we'd handle those wrong. I can't see a
> way of preventing that unless we keep the upper 32 bits for errors.

Looking at this with fresh eyes, I think we can more closely mirror
syscall_get_error(), and do something like:

static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
					    struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	long val = regs->regs[0];
	long error = val;

	if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
		error = sign_extend64(error, 31);
	
	return IS_ERR_VALUE(error) ? error : val;
}

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Mark.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 ++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index cfc0672013f6..cd7a22787aeb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,12 @@ static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
> >  static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> >  					    struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -	return regs->regs[0];
> > +	long val = regs->regs[0];
> > +
> > +	if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
> > +		val = sign_extend64(val, 31);
> > +
> > +	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void syscall_set_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16  7:55 [PATCH 1/3] arm64: ptrace: Add is_syscall_success to handle compat He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55 ` He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55 ` He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: syscall.h: Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value for compat He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55   ` He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55   ` He Zhe
2021-04-16  9:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-04-16  9:43     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-04-16  9:43     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-04-20  8:38     ` He Zhe
2021-04-20  8:38       ` He Zhe
2021-04-20  8:38       ` He Zhe
2021-04-21 17:41   ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-21 17:41     ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-21 17:41     ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-22 16:55     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-04-22 16:55       ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-22 16:55       ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-16  7:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] audit: Use syscall_get_return_value to get syscall return code in audit_syscall_exit He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55   ` He Zhe
2021-04-16  7:55   ` He Zhe
2021-04-16 12:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: ptrace: Add is_syscall_success to handle compat Catalin Marinas
2021-04-16 12:33   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-16 12:33   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-16 13:34   ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-16 13:34     ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-16 13:34     ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-17 13:19     ` David Laight
2021-04-17 13:19       ` David Laight
2021-04-17 13:19       ` David Laight
2021-04-19 12:19     ` Will Deacon
2021-04-19 12:19       ` Will Deacon
2021-04-19 12:19       ` Will Deacon
2021-04-20  8:54       ` He Zhe
2021-04-20  8:54         ` He Zhe
2021-04-20  8:54         ` He Zhe
2021-04-21 17:10       ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-21 17:10         ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-21 17:10         ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-22 16:07         ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 16:07           ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 16:07           ` Will Deacon
2021-04-22 16:42           ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-22 16:42             ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-22 16:42             ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-22 18:57             ` Dmitry V. Levin
2021-04-22 18:57               ` Dmitry V. Levin
2021-04-22 18:57               ` Dmitry V. Levin
2021-04-20  8:42   ` He Zhe
2021-04-20  8:42     ` He Zhe
2021-04-20  8:42     ` He Zhe
2021-04-21 17:17     ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-21 17:17       ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-21 17:17       ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210422165545.GE66392@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhe.he@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.