From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:50:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210429105101.25667-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw) V8 of the patchset fixes more bitrot and some commit messages. The pdev field in struct drm_device points to a PCI device structure and goes back to UMS-only days when all DRM drivers were for PCI devices. Meanwhile we also support USB, SPI and platform devices. Each of those uses the generic device stored in struct drm_device.dev. To reduce duplication and remove the special case of PCI, this patchset converts all modesetting drivers from pdev to dev and makes pdev a field for legacy UMS drivers. For PCI devices, the pointer in struct drm_device.dev can be upcasted to struct pci_device; or tested for PCI with dev_is_pci(). In several places the code can use the dev field directly. After converting all drivers and the DRM core, the pdev fields becomes only relevant for legacy drivers. In a later patchset, we may want to convert these as well and remove pdev entirely. v8: * fix pdev bitrot in ast * fix commit messages (Michael) v7: * fix instances of pdev that have benn added under i915/ v6: * also remove assignment in i915/selftests in later patch (Chris) v5: * remove assignment in later patch (Chris) v4: * merged several patches * moved core changes into separate patch * vmwgfx build fix v3: * merged several patches * fix one pdev reference in nouveau (Jeremy) * rebases v2: * move whitespace fixes into separate patches (Alex, Sam) * move i915 gt/ and gvt/ changes into separate patches (Joonas) Thomas Zimmermann (5): drm/ast: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev drm/i915/gt: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev drm/i915: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev drm/i915: Don't assign to struct drm_device.pdev drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy section drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 1 - include/drm/drm_device.h | 6 +++--- 6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) base-commit: bf25e1addaf44137e20ce95de72ff118b37d808c prerequisite-patch-id: c2b2f08f0eccc9f5df0c0da49fa1d36267deb11d prerequisite-patch-id: c67e5d886a47b7d0266d81100837557fda34cb24 prerequisite-patch-id: c59ca2ddb182af06006fa360ad3e90fe16b93d3a -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:50:56 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210429105101.25667-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw) V8 of the patchset fixes more bitrot and some commit messages. The pdev field in struct drm_device points to a PCI device structure and goes back to UMS-only days when all DRM drivers were for PCI devices. Meanwhile we also support USB, SPI and platform devices. Each of those uses the generic device stored in struct drm_device.dev. To reduce duplication and remove the special case of PCI, this patchset converts all modesetting drivers from pdev to dev and makes pdev a field for legacy UMS drivers. For PCI devices, the pointer in struct drm_device.dev can be upcasted to struct pci_device; or tested for PCI with dev_is_pci(). In several places the code can use the dev field directly. After converting all drivers and the DRM core, the pdev fields becomes only relevant for legacy drivers. In a later patchset, we may want to convert these as well and remove pdev entirely. v8: * fix pdev bitrot in ast * fix commit messages (Michael) v7: * fix instances of pdev that have benn added under i915/ v6: * also remove assignment in i915/selftests in later patch (Chris) v5: * remove assignment in later patch (Chris) v4: * merged several patches * moved core changes into separate patch * vmwgfx build fix v3: * merged several patches * fix one pdev reference in nouveau (Jeremy) * rebases v2: * move whitespace fixes into separate patches (Alex, Sam) * move i915 gt/ and gvt/ changes into separate patches (Joonas) Thomas Zimmermann (5): drm/ast: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev drm/i915/gt: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev drm/i915: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev drm/i915: Don't assign to struct drm_device.pdev drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy section drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_main.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c | 1 - include/drm/drm_device.h | 6 +++--- 6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) base-commit: bf25e1addaf44137e20ce95de72ff118b37d808c prerequisite-patch-id: c2b2f08f0eccc9f5df0c0da49fa1d36267deb11d prerequisite-patch-id: c67e5d886a47b7d0266d81100837557fda34cb24 prerequisite-patch-id: c59ca2ddb182af06006fa360ad3e90fe16b93d3a -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 10:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-29 10:50 Thomas Zimmermann [this message] 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] drm/ast: Remove reference to struct drm_device.pdev Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 16:04 ` Ruhl, Michael J 2021-04-29 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ruhl, Michael J 2021-04-29 19:22 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 19:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] drm/i915/gt: " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 16:02 ` Ruhl, Michael J 2021-04-29 16:02 ` Ruhl, Michael J 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] drm/i915: " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 16:03 ` Ruhl, Michael J 2021-04-29 16:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ruhl, Michael J 2021-04-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] drm/i915: Don't assign " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy section Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 10:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2021-04-29 16:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm: Move struct drm_device.pdev to legacy (rev8) Patchwork 2021-04-29 17:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-04-29 20:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210429105101.25667-1-tzimmermann@suse.de \ --to=tzimmermann@suse.de \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \ --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.