From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:07:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520180747.03fd60b8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZhhNQupN_4Oh759bKL7sEM9M=yOW1y-mT69ugEkjRMZw@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
18:00:04 +0200:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> > 17:24:26 +0200:
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> > > (...)
> > > > - uint32_t flash_base; // Address within FLASH of image
> > > (...)
> > > > + u32 flash_base; // Address within FLASH of image
> > >
> > > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > > deviations we accommodate for.
> >
> > I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
> >
> > I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.
>
> Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
> I'm too old!
Don't be sad, the new trend is to be sleek. In the dark I worship
variables declaration in a reverse Christmas tree order ;-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:07:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520180747.03fd60b8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZhhNQupN_4Oh759bKL7sEM9M=yOW1y-mT69ugEkjRMZw@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
18:00:04 +0200:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> > 17:24:26 +0200:
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> > > (...)
> > > > - uint32_t flash_base; // Address within FLASH of image
> > > (...)
> > > > + u32 flash_base; // Address within FLASH of image
> > >
> > > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > > deviations we accommodate for.
> >
> > I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
> >
> > I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.
>
> Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
> I'm too old!
Don't be sad, the new trend is to be sleek. In the dark I worship
variables declaration in a reverse Christmas tree order ;-)
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 11:48 [PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node Corentin Labbe
2021-05-20 11:48 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-20 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues Corentin Labbe
2021-05-20 11:48 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-20 15:24 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 15:24 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 15:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-20 15:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-20 16:00 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 16:00 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 16:07 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-05-20 16:07 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-26 9:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-26 9:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-20 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 15:21 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-26 9:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-05-26 9:02 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210520180747.03fd60b8@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=clabbe@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.