From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, agross@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org, marijn.suijten@somainline.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] cpuidle: qcom_spm: Detach state machine from main SPM handling Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:24:38 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <202106251218.WzYv1ZLl-lkp@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210622141117.358893-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2476 bytes --] Hi AngeloGioacchino, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on robh/for-next linus/master v5.13-rc7 next-20210624] [cannot apply to daniel.lezcano/clockevents/next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/Implement-SPM-SAW-for-MSM8998-and-SDM6xx/20210622-221217 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next config: arm64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/a5f597a04c298c9fa6e493d34e133da8a1468322 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/Implement-SPM-SAW-for-MSM8998-and-SDM6xx/20210622-221217 git checkout a5f597a04c298c9fa6e493d34e133da8a1468322 # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:198:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class 198 | arch_initcall(qcom_spm_init); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:198:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'arch_initcall' [-Werror=implicit-int] >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:198:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:194:19: warning: 'qcom_spm_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 194 | static int __init qcom_spm_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +198 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c 193 194 static int __init qcom_spm_init(void) 195 { 196 return platform_driver_register(&spm_driver); 197 } > 198 arch_initcall(qcom_spm_init); --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org [-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --] [-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 77529 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] cpuidle: qcom_spm: Detach state machine from main SPM handling Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:24:38 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <202106251218.WzYv1ZLl-lkp@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210622141117.358893-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2531 bytes --] Hi AngeloGioacchino, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on robh/for-next linus/master v5.13-rc7 next-20210624] [cannot apply to daniel.lezcano/clockevents/next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/Implement-SPM-SAW-for-MSM8998-and-SDM6xx/20210622-221217 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next config: arm64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/a5f597a04c298c9fa6e493d34e133da8a1468322 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/Implement-SPM-SAW-for-MSM8998-and-SDM6xx/20210622-221217 git checkout a5f597a04c298c9fa6e493d34e133da8a1468322 # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:198:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class 198 | arch_initcall(qcom_spm_init); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:198:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'arch_initcall' [-Werror=implicit-int] >> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:198:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c:194:19: warning: 'qcom_spm_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 194 | static int __init qcom_spm_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +198 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c 193 194 static int __init qcom_spm_init(void) 195 { 196 return platform_driver_register(&spm_driver); 197 } > 198 arch_initcall(qcom_spm_init); --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org [-- Attachment #2: config.gz --] [-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 77529 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 4:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-22 14:11 [PATCH v7 0/5] Implement SPM/SAW for MSM8998 and SDM6xx AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2021-06-22 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] cpuidle: qcom_spm: Detach state machine from main SPM handling AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2021-06-22 15:06 ` Stephan Gerhold 2021-06-25 4:24 ` kernel test robot [this message] 2021-06-25 4:24 ` kernel test robot 2021-06-22 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add devicetree binding for QCOM SPM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2021-06-23 14:19 ` Rob Herring 2021-06-22 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] soc: qcom: spm: Implement support for SAWv4.1, SDM630/660 L2 AVS AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2021-06-22 15:14 ` Stephan Gerhold 2021-06-22 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] soc: qcom: spm: Add compatible for MSM8998 SAWv4.1 L2 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2021-06-22 15:18 ` Stephan Gerhold 2021-06-22 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: spm: Document SDM660 and MSM8998 compatibles AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2021-07-13 22:21 ` Rob Herring 2021-07-29 13:26 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=202106251218.WzYv1ZLl-lkp@intel.com \ --to=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=agross@kernel.org \ --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org \ --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \ --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \ --cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.