From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_rps_read_punit_req() can be static
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:30:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210710073013.GA6770@5abf3d7615d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710012026.19705-15-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:1969:5: warning: symbol 'intel_rps_read_punit_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:1978:5: warning: symbol 'intel_rps_get_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
intel_rps.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 88ffc5d90730a..a78af6b0babea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
return freq;
}
-u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
+static u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
{
struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
return pureq;
}
-u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
+static u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
{
u32 req = pureq >> GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_rps_read_punit_req() can be static
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:30:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210710073013.GA6770@5abf3d7615d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710012026.19705-15-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:1969:5: warning: symbol 'intel_rps_read_punit_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:1978:5: warning: symbol 'intel_rps_get_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
intel_rps.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 88ffc5d90730a..a78af6b0babea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
return freq;
}
-u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
+static u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
{
struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
return pureq;
}
-u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
+static u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
{
u32 req = pureq >> GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_rps_read_punit_req() can be static
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 15:30:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210710073013.GA6770@5abf3d7615d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710012026.19705-15-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1209 bytes --]
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:1969:5: warning: symbol 'intel_rps_read_punit_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:1978:5: warning: symbol 'intel_rps_get_req' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
intel_rps.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 88ffc5d90730a..a78af6b0babea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -1966,7 +1966,7 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
return freq;
}
-u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
+static u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
{
struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
return pureq;
}
-u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
+static u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
{
u32 req = pureq >> GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-10 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 1:20 [PATCH 00/16] Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/guc: Squashed patch - DO NOT REVIEW Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 14:27 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 14:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-12 18:40 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-12 18:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-12 23:43 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-12 23:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when slpc is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Lay out slpc init/enable/disable/fini Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 14:35 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 14:35 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13 0:37 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-13 0:37 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding slpc communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 15:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 15:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13 23:22 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-13 23:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 16:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-14 1:40 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-14 1:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable slpc and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 17:37 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 17:37 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-15 1:58 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-15 1:58 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 17:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 17:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 3:07 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 3:07 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 3:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-10 5:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 5:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 5:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-10 17:47 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-16 18:00 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-16 18:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 17:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 17:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 22:08 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 22:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for slpc info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:08 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 18:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 23:00 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 18:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-17 19:30 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-17 19:30 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 23:05 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 23:05 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update slpc to use platform min/max Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 6:18 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 6:18 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 6:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-07-10 7:30 ` [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_rps_read_punit_req() can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-10 13:54 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc kernel test robot
2021-07-10 13:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-10 18:20 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 18:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 23:38 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 23:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:29 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 18:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 1:06 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 1:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GUCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 18:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 1:11 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 1:11 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Enable GuC based power management features Patchwork
2021-07-10 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-10 2:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210710073013.GA6770@5abf3d7615d3 \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.