All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 00/10] Improve RISC-V Perf support using SBI PMU and sscofpmf extension
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:17:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211005121744.728385be@redslave.neermore.group> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910192757.2309100-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:27:47 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:

Hello Atish,

> Perf stat:
> =========
> 
> [root@fedora-riscv riscv]# perf stat -e r8000000000000005 -e
> r8000000000000007 -e r8000000000000006 -e r0000000000020002 -e
> r0000000000020004 -e branch-misses -e cache-misses -e
> dTLB-load-misses -e dTLB-store-misses -e iTLB-load-misses -e cycles
> -e instructions ./hackbench -pipe 15 process Running with 15*40 (==
> 600) tasks. Time: 6.578
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './hackbench -pipe 15 process':
> 
>              6,491      r8000000000000005      (52.59%) -->
> SBI_PMU_FW_SET_TIMER 20,433      r8000000000000007      (60.74%) -->
> SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_RECVD 21,271      r8000000000000006      (68.71%) -->
> SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_SENT 0      r0000000000020002      (76.55%)
>      <not counted>      r0000000000020004      (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      branch-misses          (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      cache-misses           (0.00%)
>         57,537,853      dTLB-load-misses       (9.49%)
>          2,821,147      dTLB-store-misses      (18.64%)
>         52,928,130      iTLB-load-misses       (27.53%)
>     89,521,791,110      cycles                 (36.08%)
>     90,678,132,464      instructions #    1.01  insn per cycle
> (44.44%)
> 
>        6.975908032 seconds time elapsed
> 
>        3.130950000 seconds user
>       24.353310000 seconds sys
> 

Tested your patch series with qemu and got results as expected:

perf stat -e r8000000000000005 -e r8000000000000007 \
-e r8000000000000006 -e r0000000000020002 -e r0000000000020004 -e
branch-misses \ -e cache-misses -e dTLB-load-misses -e
dTLB-store-misses -e iTLB-load-misses \ -e cycles -e instructions
./hackbench -pipe 15 process

Running with 15*40 (== 600) tasks.nch -pipe 15 process
Time: 20.027

 Performance counter stats for './hackbench -pipe 15 process':

              4896      r8000000000000005
                            (53.34%) 0      r8000000000000007
                                                (61.20%) 0
              r8000000000000006
                  (68.88%) 0      r0000000000020002
                                      (76.53%) <not counted>
              r0000000000020004
                  (0.00%) <not counted>      branch-misses
                                                 (0.00%) <not counted>
                  cache-misses
                      (0.00%) 48414917      dTLB-load-misses
                                                (9.87%) 2427413
              dTLB-store-misses
                  (19.43%) 46958092      iTLB-load-misses
                                             (28.58%) 69245163600
              cycles
                  (37.09%) 70334279943      instructions              #
                 1.02  insn per cycle           (45.24%)

      20.895871900 seconds time elapsed

       2.724942000 seconds user
      18.126277000 seconds sys

perf top/record also works.

Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>

Yours,
Nikita Shubin



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 00/10] Improve RISC-V Perf support using SBI PMU and sscofpmf extension
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:17:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211005121744.728385be@redslave.neermore.group> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910192757.2309100-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:27:47 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:

Hello Atish,

> Perf stat:
> =========
> 
> [root@fedora-riscv riscv]# perf stat -e r8000000000000005 -e
> r8000000000000007 -e r8000000000000006 -e r0000000000020002 -e
> r0000000000020004 -e branch-misses -e cache-misses -e
> dTLB-load-misses -e dTLB-store-misses -e iTLB-load-misses -e cycles
> -e instructions ./hackbench -pipe 15 process Running with 15*40 (==
> 600) tasks. Time: 6.578
> 
>  Performance counter stats for './hackbench -pipe 15 process':
> 
>              6,491      r8000000000000005      (52.59%) -->
> SBI_PMU_FW_SET_TIMER 20,433      r8000000000000007      (60.74%) -->
> SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_RECVD 21,271      r8000000000000006      (68.71%) -->
> SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_SENT 0      r0000000000020002      (76.55%)
>      <not counted>      r0000000000020004      (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      branch-misses          (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      cache-misses           (0.00%)
>         57,537,853      dTLB-load-misses       (9.49%)
>          2,821,147      dTLB-store-misses      (18.64%)
>         52,928,130      iTLB-load-misses       (27.53%)
>     89,521,791,110      cycles                 (36.08%)
>     90,678,132,464      instructions #    1.01  insn per cycle
> (44.44%)
> 
>        6.975908032 seconds time elapsed
> 
>        3.130950000 seconds user
>       24.353310000 seconds sys
> 

Tested your patch series with qemu and got results as expected:

perf stat -e r8000000000000005 -e r8000000000000007 \
-e r8000000000000006 -e r0000000000020002 -e r0000000000020004 -e
branch-misses \ -e cache-misses -e dTLB-load-misses -e
dTLB-store-misses -e iTLB-load-misses \ -e cycles -e instructions
./hackbench -pipe 15 process

Running with 15*40 (== 600) tasks.nch -pipe 15 process
Time: 20.027

 Performance counter stats for './hackbench -pipe 15 process':

              4896      r8000000000000005
                            (53.34%) 0      r8000000000000007
                                                (61.20%) 0
              r8000000000000006
                  (68.88%) 0      r0000000000020002
                                      (76.53%) <not counted>
              r0000000000020004
                  (0.00%) <not counted>      branch-misses
                                                 (0.00%) <not counted>
                  cache-misses
                      (0.00%) 48414917      dTLB-load-misses
                                                (9.87%) 2427413
              dTLB-store-misses
                  (19.43%) 46958092      iTLB-load-misses
                                             (28.58%) 69245163600
              cycles
                  (37.09%) 70334279943      instructions              #
                 1.02  insn per cycle           (45.24%)

      20.895871900 seconds time elapsed

       2.724942000 seconds user
      18.126277000 seconds sys

perf top/record also works.

Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>

Yours,
Nikita Shubin



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-10 19:27 [v3 00/10] Improve RISC-V Perf support using SBI PMU and sscofpmf extension Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 01/10] RISC-V: Remove the current perf implementation Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
     [not found]   ` <238571632287002@mail.yandex.ru>
2021-09-22  5:25     ` Nikita Shubin
2021-09-22  5:25       ` Nikita Shubin
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 02/10] RISC-V: Add CSR encodings for all HPMCOUNTERS Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 03/10] RISC-V: Add a perf core library for pmu drivers Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 04/10] RISC-V: Add a simple platform driver for RISC-V legacy perf Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 05/10] RISC-V: Add RISC-V SBI PMU extension definitions Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 06/10] dt-binding: pmu: Add RISC-V PMU DT bindings Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-13 12:18   ` Rob Herring
2021-09-13 12:18     ` Rob Herring
2021-09-14 15:50   ` Rob Herring
2021-09-14 15:50     ` Rob Herring
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 07/10] RISC-V: Add perf platform driver based on SBI PMU extension Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 08/10] RISC-V: Add interrupt support for perf Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 09/10] Documentation: riscv: Remove the old documentation Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27 ` [v3 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for RISC-V PMU drivers Atish Patra
2021-09-10 19:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-10-04 18:20 ` [v3 00/10] Improve RISC-V Perf support using SBI PMU and sscofpmf extension Palmer Dabbelt
2021-10-04 18:20   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-10-06 18:27   ` Atish Patra
2021-10-06 18:27     ` Atish Patra
2021-10-05  9:17 ` Nikita Shubin [this message]
2021-10-05  9:17   ` Nikita Shubin
2021-10-06 18:28   ` Atish Patra
2021-10-06 18:28     ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211005121744.728385be@redslave.neermore.group \
    --to=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anup.patel@wdc.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.chen@sifive.com \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.