All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 32/77] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function
Date: Wed,  6 Oct 2021 20:30:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211006173113.26445-33-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006173113.26445-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

Based on the common header (struct kvmi_msg_hdr), the receiving thread
will read/validate all messages, execute the VM introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VM_GET_INFO) and dispatch the vCPU introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS) to the vCPU threads.

The vCPU threads will reply to vCPU introspection commands without
the help of the receiving thread. Same for sending vCPU events, but
the vCPU thread will wait for the receiving thread to get the event
reply. Meanwhile, it will execute any queued vCPU introspection command.

The receiving thread will end when the socket is closed or on the first
API error (eg. wrong message size).

Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst               |  75 ++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h                     |  11 ++
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c  | 100 +++++++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c                 |  43 ++++-
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h             |  10 ++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c             | 161 +++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 59cc33a39f9f..ae6bbf37aef3 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -65,6 +65,74 @@ been used on that guest (if requested). Obviously, whether the guest can
 really continue normal execution depends on whether the introspection
 tool has made any modifications that require an active KVMI channel.
 
+All messages (commands or events) have a common header::
+
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+		__u16 id;
+		__u16 size;
+		__u32 seq;
+	};
+
+The replies have the same header, with the sequence number (``seq``)
+and message id (``id``) matching the command/event.
+
+After ``kvmi_msg_hdr``, ``id`` specific data of ``size`` bytes will
+follow.
+
+The message header and its data must be sent with one ``sendmsg()`` call
+to the socket. This simplifies the receiver loop and avoids
+the reconstruction of messages on the other side.
+
+The wire protocol uses the host native byte-order. The introspection tool
+must check this during the handshake and do the necessary conversion.
+
+A command reply begins with::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code {
+		__s32 err;
+		__u32 padding;
+	}
+
+followed by the command specific data if the error code ``err`` is zero.
+
+The error code -KVM_ENOSYS is returned for unsupported commands.
+
+The error code -KVM_EPERM is returned for disallowed commands (see **Hooking**).
+
+Other error codes can be returned during message handling, but for
+some errors (incomplete messages, wrong sequence numbers, socket errors
+etc.) the socket will be closed. The device manager should reconnect.
+
+When a vCPU thread sends an introspection event, it will wait (and handle
+any related introspection command) until it gets the event reply::
+
+   Host kernel               Introspection tool
+   -----------               ------------------
+   event 1 ->
+                             <- command 1
+   command 1 reply ->
+                             <- command 2
+   command 2 reply ->
+                             <- event 1 reply
+
+As it can be seen below, the wire protocol specifies occasional padding. This
+is to permit working with the data by directly using C structures or to round
+the structure size to a multiple of 8 bytes (64bit) to improve the copy
+operations that happen during ``recvmsg()`` or ``sendmsg()``. The members
+should have the native alignment of the host. All padding must be
+initialized with zero otherwise the respective command will fail with
+-KVM_EINVAL.
+
+To describe the commands/events, we reuse some conventions from api.rst:
+
+  - Architectures: which instruction set architectures provide this command/event
+
+  - Versions: which versions provide this command/event
+
+  - Parameters: incoming message data
+
+  - Returns: outgoing/reply message data
+
 Handshake
 ---------
 
@@ -99,6 +167,13 @@ In the end, the device manager will pass the file descriptor (plus
 the allowed commands/events) to KVM. It will detect when the socket is
 shutdown and it will reinitiate the handshake.
 
+Once the file descriptor reaches KVM, the introspection tool should
+use the *KVMI_GET_VERSION* command to get the API version and/or the
+*KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND* and *KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT* commands to see which
+commands/events are allowed for this guest. The error code -KVM_EPERM
+will be returned if the introspection tool uses a command or tries to
+enable an event which is disallowed.
+
 Unhooking
 ---------
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index 85f8622ddf95..2b37eee82c52 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -32,4 +32,15 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_EVENT
 };
 
+struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+	__u16 id;
+	__u16 size;
+	__u32 seq;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_error_code {
+	__s32 err;
+	__u32 padding;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index 25bef2164186..6d7802403f16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "processor.h"
 #include "../lib/kvm_util_internal.h"
 
+#include "linux/kvm_para.h"
 #include "linux/kvmi.h"
 
 #define VCPU_ID 1
@@ -117,10 +118,109 @@ static void unhook_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 		errno, strerror(errno));
 }
 
+static void receive_data(void *dest, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	r = recv(Userspace_socket, dest, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"recv() failed, expected %zd, result %zd, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static int receive_cmd_reply(struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req, void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+
+	receive_data(&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.seq == req->seq,
+		"Unexpected messages sequence 0x%x, expected 0x%x\n",
+		hdr.seq, req->seq);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size >= sizeof(ec),
+		"Invalid message size %d, expected %zd bytes (at least)\n",
+		hdr.size, sizeof(ec));
+
+	receive_data(&ec, sizeof(ec));
+
+	if (ec.err) {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec),
+			"Invalid command reply on error\n");
+	} else {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec) + rpl_size,
+			"Invalid command reply\n");
+
+		if (rpl && rpl_size)
+			receive_data(rpl, rpl_size);
+	}
+
+	return ec.err;
+}
+
+static unsigned int new_seq(void)
+{
+	static unsigned int seq;
+
+	return seq++;
+}
+
+static void send_message(int msg_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *hdr, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	hdr->id = msg_id;
+	hdr->seq = new_seq();
+	hdr->size = size - sizeof(*hdr);
+
+	r = send(Userspace_socket, hdr, size, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"send() failed, sending %zd, result %zd, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static const char *kvm_strerror(int error)
+{
+	switch (error) {
+	case KVM_ENOSYS:
+		return "Invalid system call number";
+	case KVM_EOPNOTSUPP:
+		return "Operation not supported on transport endpoint";
+	case KVM_EAGAIN:
+		return "Try again";
+	default:
+		return strerror(error);
+	}
+}
+
+static int do_command(int cmd_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req,
+		      size_t req_size, void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	send_message(cmd_id, req, req_size);
+	return receive_cmd_reply(req, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static void test_cmd_invalid(void)
+{
+	int invalid_msg_id = 0xffff;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr req;
+	int r;
+
+	r = do_command(invalid_msg_id, &req, sizeof(req), NULL, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == -KVM_ENOSYS,
+		"Invalid command didn't failed with KVM_ENOSYS, error %d (%s)\n",
+		-r, kvm_strerror(-r));
+}
+
 static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	setup_socket();
 	hook_introspection(vm);
+
+	test_cmd_invalid();
+
 	unhook_introspection(vm);
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
index 9b5f1b654125..3c51a5f59ac2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
@@ -13,11 +13,51 @@
 #define KVMI_NUM_EVENTS   __cmp((int)KVMI_NEXT_VM_EVENT, \
 				(int)KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_EVENT, >)
 
-int kvmi_init(void)
+#define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MAX_MSG_SIZE)
+
+static struct kmem_cache *msg_cache;
+
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void)
+{
+	return kmem_cache_zalloc(msg_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr)
+{
+	if (addr)
+		kmem_cache_free(msg_cache, addr);
+}
+
+static void kvmi_cache_destroy(void)
+{
+	kmem_cache_destroy(msg_cache);
+	msg_cache = NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_cache_create(void)
 {
+	msg_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvmi_msg", KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC,
+				      4096, SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
+
+	if (!msg_cache) {
+		kvmi_cache_destroy();
+
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+bool kvmi_is_command_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
+{
+	return id < KVMI_NUM_COMMANDS && test_bit(id, kvmi->cmd_allow_mask);
+}
+
+int kvmi_init(void)
+{
+	return kvmi_cache_create();
+}
+
 int kvmi_version(void)
 {
 	return KVMI_VERSION;
@@ -25,6 +65,7 @@ int kvmi_version(void)
 
 void kvmi_uninit(void)
 {
+	kvmi_cache_destroy();
 }
 
 static void kvmi_free(struct kvm *kvm)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index c89875bd2bac..206aaf93f8ba 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
 #include <uapi/linux/kvmi.h>
 
 #define KVMI(kvm) ((kvm)->kvmi)
+/*
+ * This limit is used to accommodate the largest known fixed-length
+ * message.
+ */
+#define KVMI_MAX_MSG_SIZE (4096 * 2 - sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr))
 
 /* kvmi_msg.c */
 bool kvmi_sock_get(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, int fd);
@@ -14,4 +19,9 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 void kvmi_sock_put(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 
+/* kvmi.c */
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void);
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr);
+bool kvmi_is_command_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
index 9387b1427cbe..b72df00ae8a7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
 #include <linux/net.h>
 #include "kvmi_int.h"
 
+typedef int (*kvmi_vm_msg_fct)(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			       const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+			       const void *req);
+
 bool kvmi_sock_get(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, int fd)
 {
 	struct socket *sock;
@@ -33,7 +37,162 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 	kernel_sock_shutdown(kvmi->sock, SHUT_RDWR);
 }
 
+static int handle_sock_rc(int rc, size_t size)
+{
+	if (unlikely(rc < 0))
+		return rc;
+	if (unlikely(rc != size))
+		return -EPIPE;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_read(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, void *buf,
+			  size_t size)
+{
+	struct kvec vec = { .iov_base = buf, .iov_len = size, };
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_recvmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, &vec, 1, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+
+	return handle_sock_rc(rc, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_write(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, struct kvec *vec,
+			   size_t n, size_t size)
+{
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_sendmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, vec, n, size);
+
+	return handle_sock_rc(rc, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+			  const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr h;
+	struct kvec vec[3] = {
+		{ .iov_base = &h, .iov_len = sizeof(h) },
+		{ .iov_base = &ec, .iov_len = sizeof(ec) },
+		{ .iov_base = (void *)rpl, .iov_len = rpl_size },
+	};
+	size_t size = sizeof(h) + sizeof(ec) + (err ? 0 : rpl_size);
+	size_t n = ARRAY_SIZE(vec) - (err ? 1 : 0);
+
+	memset(&h, 0, sizeof(h));
+	h.id = msg->id;
+	h.seq = msg->seq;
+	h.size = size - sizeof(h);
+
+	memset(&ec, 0, sizeof(ec));
+	ec.err = err;
+
+	return kvmi_sock_write(kvmi, vec, n, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			     const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+			     int err, const void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_reply(kvmi, msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These commands are executed by the receiving thread.
+ */
+static const kvmi_vm_msg_fct msg_vm[] = {
+};
+
+static kvmi_vm_msg_fct get_vm_msg_handler(u16 id)
+{
+	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vm) ? msg_vm[id] : NULL;
+}
+
+static bool is_vm_message(u16 id)
+{
+	bool is_vm_msg_id = (id & 1) == 0;
+
+	return is_vm_msg_id && !!get_vm_msg_handler(id);
+}
+
+static bool is_vm_command(u16 id)
+{
+	return is_vm_message(id);
+}
+
+static struct kvmi_msg_hdr *kvmi_msg_recv(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_alloc();
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg, sizeof(*msg));
+	if (err)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	if (msg->size) {
+		if (msg->size > KVMI_MAX_MSG_SIZE)
+			goto out_err;
+
+		err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg + 1, msg->size);
+		if (err)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	return msg;
+
+out_err:
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+out:
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_do_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			      const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	kvmi_vm_msg_fct fct = get_vm_msg_handler(msg->id);
+
+	return fct(kvmi, msg, msg + 1);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int ec)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_vm_reply(kvmi, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_handle_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				  struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	if (!kvmi_is_command_allowed(kvmi, msg->id))
+		return kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_EPERM);
+
+	return kvmi_msg_do_vm_cmd(kvmi, msg);
+}
+
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 {
-	return false;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err = -1;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_recv(kvmi);
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (is_vm_command(msg->id))
+		err = kvmi_msg_handle_vm_cmd(kvmi, msg);
+	else
+		err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_ENOSYS);
+
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+out:
+	return err == 0;
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 32/77] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function
Date: Wed,  6 Oct 2021 20:30:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211006173113.26445-33-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006173113.26445-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

Based on the common header (struct kvmi_msg_hdr), the receiving thread
will read/validate all messages, execute the VM introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VM_GET_INFO) and dispatch the vCPU introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS) to the vCPU threads.

The vCPU threads will reply to vCPU introspection commands without
the help of the receiving thread. Same for sending vCPU events, but
the vCPU thread will wait for the receiving thread to get the event
reply. Meanwhile, it will execute any queued vCPU introspection command.

The receiving thread will end when the socket is closed or on the first
API error (eg. wrong message size).

Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst               |  75 ++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h                     |  11 ++
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c  | 100 +++++++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c                 |  43 ++++-
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h             |  10 ++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c             | 161 +++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 59cc33a39f9f..ae6bbf37aef3 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -65,6 +65,74 @@ been used on that guest (if requested). Obviously, whether the guest can
 really continue normal execution depends on whether the introspection
 tool has made any modifications that require an active KVMI channel.
 
+All messages (commands or events) have a common header::
+
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+		__u16 id;
+		__u16 size;
+		__u32 seq;
+	};
+
+The replies have the same header, with the sequence number (``seq``)
+and message id (``id``) matching the command/event.
+
+After ``kvmi_msg_hdr``, ``id`` specific data of ``size`` bytes will
+follow.
+
+The message header and its data must be sent with one ``sendmsg()`` call
+to the socket. This simplifies the receiver loop and avoids
+the reconstruction of messages on the other side.
+
+The wire protocol uses the host native byte-order. The introspection tool
+must check this during the handshake and do the necessary conversion.
+
+A command reply begins with::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code {
+		__s32 err;
+		__u32 padding;
+	}
+
+followed by the command specific data if the error code ``err`` is zero.
+
+The error code -KVM_ENOSYS is returned for unsupported commands.
+
+The error code -KVM_EPERM is returned for disallowed commands (see **Hooking**).
+
+Other error codes can be returned during message handling, but for
+some errors (incomplete messages, wrong sequence numbers, socket errors
+etc.) the socket will be closed. The device manager should reconnect.
+
+When a vCPU thread sends an introspection event, it will wait (and handle
+any related introspection command) until it gets the event reply::
+
+   Host kernel               Introspection tool
+   -----------               ------------------
+   event 1 ->
+                             <- command 1
+   command 1 reply ->
+                             <- command 2
+   command 2 reply ->
+                             <- event 1 reply
+
+As it can be seen below, the wire protocol specifies occasional padding. This
+is to permit working with the data by directly using C structures or to round
+the structure size to a multiple of 8 bytes (64bit) to improve the copy
+operations that happen during ``recvmsg()`` or ``sendmsg()``. The members
+should have the native alignment of the host. All padding must be
+initialized with zero otherwise the respective command will fail with
+-KVM_EINVAL.
+
+To describe the commands/events, we reuse some conventions from api.rst:
+
+  - Architectures: which instruction set architectures provide this command/event
+
+  - Versions: which versions provide this command/event
+
+  - Parameters: incoming message data
+
+  - Returns: outgoing/reply message data
+
 Handshake
 ---------
 
@@ -99,6 +167,13 @@ In the end, the device manager will pass the file descriptor (plus
 the allowed commands/events) to KVM. It will detect when the socket is
 shutdown and it will reinitiate the handshake.
 
+Once the file descriptor reaches KVM, the introspection tool should
+use the *KVMI_GET_VERSION* command to get the API version and/or the
+*KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND* and *KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT* commands to see which
+commands/events are allowed for this guest. The error code -KVM_EPERM
+will be returned if the introspection tool uses a command or tries to
+enable an event which is disallowed.
+
 Unhooking
 ---------
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index 85f8622ddf95..2b37eee82c52 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -32,4 +32,15 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_EVENT
 };
 
+struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+	__u16 id;
+	__u16 size;
+	__u32 seq;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_error_code {
+	__s32 err;
+	__u32 padding;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index 25bef2164186..6d7802403f16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "processor.h"
 #include "../lib/kvm_util_internal.h"
 
+#include "linux/kvm_para.h"
 #include "linux/kvmi.h"
 
 #define VCPU_ID 1
@@ -117,10 +118,109 @@ static void unhook_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 		errno, strerror(errno));
 }
 
+static void receive_data(void *dest, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	r = recv(Userspace_socket, dest, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"recv() failed, expected %zd, result %zd, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static int receive_cmd_reply(struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req, void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+
+	receive_data(&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.seq == req->seq,
+		"Unexpected messages sequence 0x%x, expected 0x%x\n",
+		hdr.seq, req->seq);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size >= sizeof(ec),
+		"Invalid message size %d, expected %zd bytes (at least)\n",
+		hdr.size, sizeof(ec));
+
+	receive_data(&ec, sizeof(ec));
+
+	if (ec.err) {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec),
+			"Invalid command reply on error\n");
+	} else {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec) + rpl_size,
+			"Invalid command reply\n");
+
+		if (rpl && rpl_size)
+			receive_data(rpl, rpl_size);
+	}
+
+	return ec.err;
+}
+
+static unsigned int new_seq(void)
+{
+	static unsigned int seq;
+
+	return seq++;
+}
+
+static void send_message(int msg_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *hdr, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	hdr->id = msg_id;
+	hdr->seq = new_seq();
+	hdr->size = size - sizeof(*hdr);
+
+	r = send(Userspace_socket, hdr, size, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"send() failed, sending %zd, result %zd, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static const char *kvm_strerror(int error)
+{
+	switch (error) {
+	case KVM_ENOSYS:
+		return "Invalid system call number";
+	case KVM_EOPNOTSUPP:
+		return "Operation not supported on transport endpoint";
+	case KVM_EAGAIN:
+		return "Try again";
+	default:
+		return strerror(error);
+	}
+}
+
+static int do_command(int cmd_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req,
+		      size_t req_size, void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	send_message(cmd_id, req, req_size);
+	return receive_cmd_reply(req, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static void test_cmd_invalid(void)
+{
+	int invalid_msg_id = 0xffff;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr req;
+	int r;
+
+	r = do_command(invalid_msg_id, &req, sizeof(req), NULL, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == -KVM_ENOSYS,
+		"Invalid command didn't failed with KVM_ENOSYS, error %d (%s)\n",
+		-r, kvm_strerror(-r));
+}
+
 static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	setup_socket();
 	hook_introspection(vm);
+
+	test_cmd_invalid();
+
 	unhook_introspection(vm);
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
index 9b5f1b654125..3c51a5f59ac2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
@@ -13,11 +13,51 @@
 #define KVMI_NUM_EVENTS   __cmp((int)KVMI_NEXT_VM_EVENT, \
 				(int)KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_EVENT, >)
 
-int kvmi_init(void)
+#define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MAX_MSG_SIZE)
+
+static struct kmem_cache *msg_cache;
+
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void)
+{
+	return kmem_cache_zalloc(msg_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr)
+{
+	if (addr)
+		kmem_cache_free(msg_cache, addr);
+}
+
+static void kvmi_cache_destroy(void)
+{
+	kmem_cache_destroy(msg_cache);
+	msg_cache = NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_cache_create(void)
 {
+	msg_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvmi_msg", KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC,
+				      4096, SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
+
+	if (!msg_cache) {
+		kvmi_cache_destroy();
+
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+bool kvmi_is_command_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
+{
+	return id < KVMI_NUM_COMMANDS && test_bit(id, kvmi->cmd_allow_mask);
+}
+
+int kvmi_init(void)
+{
+	return kvmi_cache_create();
+}
+
 int kvmi_version(void)
 {
 	return KVMI_VERSION;
@@ -25,6 +65,7 @@ int kvmi_version(void)
 
 void kvmi_uninit(void)
 {
+	kvmi_cache_destroy();
 }
 
 static void kvmi_free(struct kvm *kvm)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index c89875bd2bac..206aaf93f8ba 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
 #include <uapi/linux/kvmi.h>
 
 #define KVMI(kvm) ((kvm)->kvmi)
+/*
+ * This limit is used to accommodate the largest known fixed-length
+ * message.
+ */
+#define KVMI_MAX_MSG_SIZE (4096 * 2 - sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr))
 
 /* kvmi_msg.c */
 bool kvmi_sock_get(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, int fd);
@@ -14,4 +19,9 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 void kvmi_sock_put(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 
+/* kvmi.c */
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void);
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr);
+bool kvmi_is_command_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
index 9387b1427cbe..b72df00ae8a7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
 #include <linux/net.h>
 #include "kvmi_int.h"
 
+typedef int (*kvmi_vm_msg_fct)(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			       const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+			       const void *req);
+
 bool kvmi_sock_get(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, int fd)
 {
 	struct socket *sock;
@@ -33,7 +37,162 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 	kernel_sock_shutdown(kvmi->sock, SHUT_RDWR);
 }
 
+static int handle_sock_rc(int rc, size_t size)
+{
+	if (unlikely(rc < 0))
+		return rc;
+	if (unlikely(rc != size))
+		return -EPIPE;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_read(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, void *buf,
+			  size_t size)
+{
+	struct kvec vec = { .iov_base = buf, .iov_len = size, };
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_recvmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, &vec, 1, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+
+	return handle_sock_rc(rc, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_write(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, struct kvec *vec,
+			   size_t n, size_t size)
+{
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_sendmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, vec, n, size);
+
+	return handle_sock_rc(rc, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+			  const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr h;
+	struct kvec vec[3] = {
+		{ .iov_base = &h, .iov_len = sizeof(h) },
+		{ .iov_base = &ec, .iov_len = sizeof(ec) },
+		{ .iov_base = (void *)rpl, .iov_len = rpl_size },
+	};
+	size_t size = sizeof(h) + sizeof(ec) + (err ? 0 : rpl_size);
+	size_t n = ARRAY_SIZE(vec) - (err ? 1 : 0);
+
+	memset(&h, 0, sizeof(h));
+	h.id = msg->id;
+	h.seq = msg->seq;
+	h.size = size - sizeof(h);
+
+	memset(&ec, 0, sizeof(ec));
+	ec.err = err;
+
+	return kvmi_sock_write(kvmi, vec, n, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			     const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+			     int err, const void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_reply(kvmi, msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These commands are executed by the receiving thread.
+ */
+static const kvmi_vm_msg_fct msg_vm[] = {
+};
+
+static kvmi_vm_msg_fct get_vm_msg_handler(u16 id)
+{
+	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vm) ? msg_vm[id] : NULL;
+}
+
+static bool is_vm_message(u16 id)
+{
+	bool is_vm_msg_id = (id & 1) == 0;
+
+	return is_vm_msg_id && !!get_vm_msg_handler(id);
+}
+
+static bool is_vm_command(u16 id)
+{
+	return is_vm_message(id);
+}
+
+static struct kvmi_msg_hdr *kvmi_msg_recv(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_alloc();
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg, sizeof(*msg));
+	if (err)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	if (msg->size) {
+		if (msg->size > KVMI_MAX_MSG_SIZE)
+			goto out_err;
+
+		err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg + 1, msg->size);
+		if (err)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	return msg;
+
+out_err:
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+out:
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_do_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			      const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	kvmi_vm_msg_fct fct = get_vm_msg_handler(msg->id);
+
+	return fct(kvmi, msg, msg + 1);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int ec)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_vm_reply(kvmi, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_handle_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				  struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	if (!kvmi_is_command_allowed(kvmi, msg->id))
+		return kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_EPERM);
+
+	return kvmi_msg_do_vm_cmd(kvmi, msg);
+}
+
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 {
-	return false;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err = -1;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_recv(kvmi);
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (is_vm_command(msg->id))
+		err = kvmi_msg_handle_vm_cmd(kvmi, msg);
+	else
+		err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_ENOSYS);
+
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+out:
+	return err == 0;
 }
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-06 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 157+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-06 17:29 [PATCH v12 00/77] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29 ` [PATCH v12 01/77] KVM: UAPI: add error codes used by the VM introspection code Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29 ` [PATCH v12 02/77] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29 ` [PATCH v12 03/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:29   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 04/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 05/77] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 06/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.bp_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 07/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_cr3_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 08/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 09/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.desc_ctrl_supported() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 10/77] KVM: svm: add support for descriptor-table VM-exits Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 11/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 12/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 13/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 14/77] KVM: x86: svm: use the vmx convention to control the MSR interception Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 15/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 16/77] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 17/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 18/77] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 19/77] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 20/77] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 21/77] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 22/77] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 23/77] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 24/77] KVM: x86: page track: provide all callbacks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 25/77] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 26/77] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 27/77] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 28/77] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk SPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 29/77] KVM: introduce VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 30/77] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 31/77] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2021-10-06 17:30   ` [PATCH v12 32/77] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 33/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 34/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 35/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 36/77] KVM: introspection: add KVM_INTROSPECTION_PREUNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 37/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 38/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 39/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 40/77] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 41/77] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 42/77] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 43/77] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 44/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 45/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 46/77] KVM: introspection: add support for vCPU events Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 47/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 48/77] KVM: introspection: add the crash action handling on the event reply Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 49/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 50/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 51/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 52/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 53/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 54/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 55/77] KVM: introspection: add cleanup support for vCPUs Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 56/77] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 57/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_CLEANUP Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 58/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 59/77] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 60/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 61/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 62/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XCR Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30 ` [PATCH v12 63/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:30   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 64/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 65/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 66/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 67/77] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor-table register interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 68/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 69/77] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 70/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 71/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 72/77] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 73/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 74/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 75/77] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 76/77] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31 ` [PATCH v12 77/77] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-06 17:31   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH v12 00/77] VM introspection Mathieu Tarral

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211006173113.26445-33-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.