All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Tue,  2 Nov 2021 23:25:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211103062520.1445832-18-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103062520.1445832-1-reijiw@google.com>

Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1b4ffbf539a7..ec984fd4e319 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -817,9 +817,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
-	.ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
-			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
-			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
 	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3407,10 +3404,86 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+	u32	id;
+	u32	shift;
+	u32	frac_id;
+	u32	frac_shift;
+	u8	frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+	},
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function only checks fractional feature field and assumes
+ * the feature field is valid.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+	u32 id;
+	int fval, flim, ret;
+	u64 val, lim, mask;
+	const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	bool sign = FCT_SIGN(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+	enum feature_check_type type = FCT_TYPE(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+
+	/* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+	id = ftr_frac->id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+	if ((val & mask) != (lim & mask))
+		/*
+		 * The feature level is smaller than the limit.
+		 * Any fractional version should be fine.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check the fractional feature field */
+	id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+	fval = cpuid_feature_extract_field(val, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	flim = cpuid_feature_extract_field(lim, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+	ret = arm64_check_feature_one(type, fval, flim);
+	return ret ? -E2BIG : 0;
+}
+
 int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, err;
 	const struct kvm_vcpu *t_vcpu;
+	const struct feature_frac *frac;
 
 	/*
 	 * Make sure vcpu->arch.has_run_once is visible for others so that
@@ -3431,6 +3504,17 @@ int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 					KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+	 * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3438,6 +3522,9 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	struct feature_frac *frac;
+	u64 mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
+	u64 org;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
 		id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3533,32 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 
 		id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
 	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+
+		/*
+		 * An ID register that has fractional fields is expected
+		 * to have its own id_reg_info.
+		 */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Update the id_reg's ftr_check_types for the fractional
+		 * field with FCT_IGNORE so that the field won't be validated
+		 * when the ID register is set by userspace, which could
+		 * temporarily cause an inconsistency if its (main) feature
+		 * field is not set yet.  Save the original ftr_check_types
+		 * for the fractional field to validate the field later.
+		 */
+		org = (id_reg->ftr_check_types >> frac->frac_shift) & mask;
+		id_reg->ftr_check_types &= ~(mask << frac->frac_shift);
+		id_reg->ftr_check_types |=
+			MAKE_FCT(frac->frac_shift, FCT_IGNORE, FCT_SIGN(org));
+		frac->frac_ftr_check = org;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
-- 
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Tue,  2 Nov 2021 23:25:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211103062520.1445832-18-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103062520.1445832-1-reijiw@google.com>

Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1b4ffbf539a7..ec984fd4e319 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -817,9 +817,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
-	.ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
-			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
-			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
 	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3407,10 +3404,86 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+	u32	id;
+	u32	shift;
+	u32	frac_id;
+	u32	frac_shift;
+	u8	frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+	},
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function only checks fractional feature field and assumes
+ * the feature field is valid.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+	u32 id;
+	int fval, flim, ret;
+	u64 val, lim, mask;
+	const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	bool sign = FCT_SIGN(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+	enum feature_check_type type = FCT_TYPE(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+
+	/* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+	id = ftr_frac->id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+	if ((val & mask) != (lim & mask))
+		/*
+		 * The feature level is smaller than the limit.
+		 * Any fractional version should be fine.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check the fractional feature field */
+	id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+	fval = cpuid_feature_extract_field(val, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	flim = cpuid_feature_extract_field(lim, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+	ret = arm64_check_feature_one(type, fval, flim);
+	return ret ? -E2BIG : 0;
+}
+
 int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, err;
 	const struct kvm_vcpu *t_vcpu;
+	const struct feature_frac *frac;
 
 	/*
 	 * Make sure vcpu->arch.has_run_once is visible for others so that
@@ -3431,6 +3504,17 @@ int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 					KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+	 * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3438,6 +3522,9 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	struct feature_frac *frac;
+	u64 mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
+	u64 org;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
 		id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3533,32 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 
 		id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
 	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+
+		/*
+		 * An ID register that has fractional fields is expected
+		 * to have its own id_reg_info.
+		 */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Update the id_reg's ftr_check_types for the fractional
+		 * field with FCT_IGNORE so that the field won't be validated
+		 * when the ID register is set by userspace, which could
+		 * temporarily cause an inconsistency if its (main) feature
+		 * field is not set yet.  Save the original ftr_check_types
+		 * for the fractional field to validate the field later.
+		 */
+		org = (id_reg->ftr_check_types >> frac->frac_shift) & mask;
+		id_reg->ftr_check_types &= ~(mask << frac->frac_shift);
+		id_reg->ftr_check_types |=
+			MAKE_FCT(frac->frac_shift, FCT_IGNORE, FCT_SIGN(org));
+		frac->frac_ftr_check = org;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
-- 
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	 Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	 Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	 Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Tue,  2 Nov 2021 23:25:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211103062520.1445832-18-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103062520.1445832-1-reijiw@google.com>

Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.

Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1b4ffbf539a7..ec984fd4e319 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -817,9 +817,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
 
 static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
 	.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
-	.ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
-			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
-			   U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
 	.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
 	.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
 	.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3407,10 +3404,86 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+	u32	id;
+	u32	shift;
+	u32	frac_id;
+	u32	frac_shift;
+	u8	frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+	},
+	{
+		.frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+		.frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+		.id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+		.shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+	},
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function only checks fractional feature field and assumes
+ * the feature field is valid.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+	u32 id;
+	int fval, flim, ret;
+	u64 val, lim, mask;
+	const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	bool sign = FCT_SIGN(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+	enum feature_check_type type = FCT_TYPE(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+
+	/* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+	id = ftr_frac->id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+
+	mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+	if ((val & mask) != (lim & mask))
+		/*
+		 * The feature level is smaller than the limit.
+		 * Any fractional version should be fine.
+		 */
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check the fractional feature field */
+	id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+	id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+	val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id));
+	fval = cpuid_feature_extract_field(val, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+	lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	flim = cpuid_feature_extract_field(lim, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+	ret = arm64_check_feature_one(type, fval, flim);
+	return ret ? -E2BIG : 0;
+}
+
 int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, err;
 	const struct kvm_vcpu *t_vcpu;
+	const struct feature_frac *frac;
 
 	/*
 	 * Make sure vcpu->arch.has_run_once is visible for others so that
@@ -3431,6 +3504,17 @@ int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 					KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+	 * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3438,6 +3522,9 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+	struct feature_frac *frac;
+	u64 mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
+	u64 org;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
 		id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3533,32 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
 
 		id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
 	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+		frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+		id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+
+		/*
+		 * An ID register that has fractional fields is expected
+		 * to have its own id_reg_info.
+		 */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Update the id_reg's ftr_check_types for the fractional
+		 * field with FCT_IGNORE so that the field won't be validated
+		 * when the ID register is set by userspace, which could
+		 * temporarily cause an inconsistency if its (main) feature
+		 * field is not set yet.  Save the original ftr_check_types
+		 * for the fractional field to validate the field later.
+		 */
+		org = (id_reg->ftr_check_types >> frac->frac_shift) & mask;
+		id_reg->ftr_check_types &= ~(mask << frac->frac_shift);
+		id_reg->ftr_check_types |=
+			MAKE_FCT(frac->frac_shift, FCT_IGNORE, FCT_SIGN(org));
+		frac->frac_ftr_check = org;
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
-- 
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-03  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-03  6:24 [RFC PATCH v2 00/28] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: arm64: Add has_reset_once flag for vcpu Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-04 16:10   ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:10     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:10     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per vCPU Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-04 16:14   ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:14     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:14     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 21:39     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-04 21:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-04 21:39       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-05  1:33       ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-05  1:33         ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-05  1:33         ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-05  6:25       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-05  6:25         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-05  6:25         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: arm64: Keep consistency of ID registers between vCPUs Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-04 16:33   ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:33     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:33     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-08  7:45     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-08  7:45       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-08  7:45       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:24   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2021-11-03  6:25   ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_WRITABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-04 16:40   ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:40     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-04 16:40     ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-05  4:07     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-05  4:07       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-05  4:07       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/28] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: arm64: Activate trapping of disabled CPU features for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-03  6:25   ` Reiji Watanabe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211103062520.1445832-18-reijiw@google.com \
    --to=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.