All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix LPI pending table handling vs PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 12:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119111453.gqly3pyll3eluqap@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211027151506.2085066-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com>

On 2021-10-27 16:15:03 [+0100], Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hi folks,
Hi,

> This is my take at fixing [1]. Reading about the LPI tables situation was
> entertaining.
> 
> Tested against kexec on an Ampere eMAG. Seems to be working fine atop
> 5.15-rc6. On the other hand, I can only issue one kexec from
> 5.15-rc6-rt12 - if I then issue another one on the new kernel, I get tasks
> hanging. That is true even without my patches and without
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT.

What is the status of this? I haven't seen any replies, is this just
sitting to be merged?

Sebastian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix LPI pending table handling vs PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 12:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119111453.gqly3pyll3eluqap@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211027151506.2085066-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com>

On 2021-10-27 16:15:03 [+0100], Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hi folks,
Hi,

> This is my take at fixing [1]. Reading about the LPI tables situation was
> entertaining.
> 
> Tested against kexec on an Ampere eMAG. Seems to be working fine atop
> 5.15-rc6. On the other hand, I can only issue one kexec from
> 5.15-rc6-rt12 - if I then issue another one on the new kernel, I get tasks
> hanging. That is true even without my patches and without
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT.

What is the status of this? I haven't seen any replies, is this just
sitting to be merged?

Sebastian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-27 15:15 [PATCH v2 0/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix LPI pending table handling vs PREEMPT_RT Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Give the percpu rdist struct its own flags field Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-12-16 13:30   ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] " irqchip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Postpone LPI pending table freeing and memreserve Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-12-16 13:30   ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] " irqchip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Limit memreserve cpuhp state lifetime Valentin Schneider
2021-10-27 15:15   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-12-16 13:30   ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] " irqchip-bot for Valentin Schneider
2021-11-19 11:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2021-11-19 11:14   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix LPI pending table handling vs PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-19 12:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-19 12:28     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211119111453.gqly3pyll3eluqap@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.