From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:49:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125074949.5f897431@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1849b7a3-cdfe-f9dc-e4d1-172e8b1667d2@gmail.com>
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:32:18 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I think the reference to ath10k_pci is misleading, Kalle isn't needed here.
> The actual issue is a RTNL deadlock in igb_resume(). See log snippet:
>
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: igb_resume+0xff/0x1e0 [igb 21bf6a00cb1f20e9b0e8434f7f8748a0504e93f8]
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa7/0xd0
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_callback+0x35/0x70
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_resume+0x567/0x810
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: dev_ethtool+0xd4/0x2d80
>
> We have at least two places in net core where runtime_resume() is called
> under RTNL. This conflicts with the current structure in few Intel drivers
> that have something like the following in their resume path.
>
> rtnl_lock();
> if (!err && netif_running(netdev))
> err = __igb_open(netdev, true);
>
> if (!err)
> netif_device_attach(netdev);
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> Other drivers don't do this, so it's the question whether it's actually
> needed here to take RTNL. Some discussion was started [0], but it ended
> w/o tangible result and since then it has been surprisingly quiet.
>
> [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg736880.html
Ah, that makes perfect sense, I didn't see that stack trace.
Dropping Kalle from CC. Let's hear what Intel folks have to say..
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:49:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125074949.5f897431@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1849b7a3-cdfe-f9dc-e4d1-172e8b1667d2@gmail.com>
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:32:18 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I think the reference to ath10k_pci is misleading, Kalle isn't needed here.
> The actual issue is a RTNL deadlock in igb_resume(). See log snippet:
>
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: igb_resume+0xff/0x1e0 [igb 21bf6a00cb1f20e9b0e8434f7f8748a0504e93f8]
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa7/0xd0
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_callback+0x35/0x70
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_resume+0x567/0x810
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: dev_ethtool+0xd4/0x2d80
>
> We have at least two places in net core where runtime_resume() is called
> under RTNL. This conflicts with the current structure in few Intel drivers
> that have something like the following in their resume path.
>
> rtnl_lock();
> if (!err && netif_running(netdev))
> err = __igb_open(netdev, true);
>
> if (!err)
> netif_device_attach(netdev);
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> Other drivers don't do this, so it's the question whether it's actually
> needed here to take RTNL. Some discussion was started [0], but it ended
> w/o tangible result and since then it has been surprisingly quiet.
>
> [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg736880.html
Ah, that makes perfect sense, I didn't see that stack trace.
Dropping Kalle from CC. Let's hear what Intel folks have to say..
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:49:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125074949.5f897431@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1849b7a3-cdfe-f9dc-e4d1-172e8b1667d2@gmail.com>
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:32:18 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I think the reference to ath10k_pci is misleading, Kalle isn't needed here.
> The actual issue is a RTNL deadlock in igb_resume(). See log snippet:
>
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: igb_resume+0xff/0x1e0 [igb 21bf6a00cb1f20e9b0e8434f7f8748a0504e93f8]
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa7/0xd0
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_callback+0x35/0x70
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_resume+0x567/0x810
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80
> Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: dev_ethtool+0xd4/0x2d80
>
> We have at least two places in net core where runtime_resume() is called
> under RTNL. This conflicts with the current structure in few Intel drivers
> that have something like the following in their resume path.
>
> rtnl_lock();
> if (!err && netif_running(netdev))
> err = __igb_open(netdev, true);
>
> if (!err)
> netif_device_attach(netdev);
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> Other drivers don't do this, so it's the question whether it's actually
> needed here to take RTNL. Some discussion was started [0], but it ended
> w/o tangible result and since then it has been surprisingly quiet.
>
> [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg736880.html
Ah, that makes perfect sense, I didn't see that stack trace.
Dropping Kalle from CC. Let's hear what Intel folks have to say..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 22:45 Fw: [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down Stephen Hemminger
2021-11-25 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-25 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-25 7:32 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-25 7:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-25 7:32 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-25 15:49 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-11-25 15:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-25 15:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-25 21:11 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-25 21:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-25 21:11 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-26 7:55 ` Fwd: " Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-25 11:17 ` Fw: " Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-04 8:55 ` Fw: [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-10 9:00 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-23 19:09 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211125074949.5f897431@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.