All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	keescook@chromium.org, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:55:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127085543.200dd38e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfKfDnbNGina2lKz@FVFF77S0Q05N>

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:33:02 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> I want to get the regression fixed ASAP, so can we take a simple patch for -rc2
> which disables the build-time sort where it's currently broken (by limiting the
> opt-in to arm and x86), then follow-up per-architecture to re-enable it if
> desired/safe?

I'm going to retest my patch that makes it an opt in for just x86 and arm
(32bit). I'll be pushing that hopefully later today. I have some other
patches to test as well.

-- Steve

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yinan Liu <yinan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:55:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127085543.200dd38e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfKfDnbNGina2lKz@FVFF77S0Q05N>

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:33:02 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> I want to get the regression fixed ASAP, so can we take a simple patch for -rc2
> which disables the build-time sort where it's currently broken (by limiting the
> opt-in to arm and x86), then follow-up per-architecture to re-enable it if
> desired/safe?

I'm going to retest my patch that makes it an opt in for just x86 and arm
(32bit). I'll be pushing that hopefully later today. I have some other
patches to test as well.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-24  9:19 [powerpc] ftrace warning kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2068 with code-patching selftests Sachin Sant
2022-01-24  9:19 ` Sachin Sant
2022-01-24 12:15 ` Yinan Liu
2022-01-24 16:45   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25  3:20     ` Yinan Liu
2022-01-26 14:37       ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 11:46         ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 11:46           ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:03           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:03             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:20             ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:20               ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:22               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:22                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:59                 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:59                   ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:07                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 13:07                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 13:24                     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:24                       ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:59                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 13:59                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 14:54                         ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 14:54                           ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 15:01                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 15:01                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 12:04           ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 12:04             ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 12:27             ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:27               ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 12:46               ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 12:46                 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 13:08                 ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:08                   ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:16                   ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 13:16                     ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-27 13:33                     ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:33                       ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 13:55                       ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2022-01-27 13:55                         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-27 14:56                         ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 14:56                           ` Mark Rutland
2022-01-27 16:41           ` Kees Cook
2022-01-27 16:41             ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25  4:00     ` Sachin Sant
2022-01-25 14:28       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220127085543.200dd38e@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinan@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.