All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel@profian.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST
	FRAMEWORK), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2.1 19/30] selftests/sgx: Test two different SGX2 EAUG flows
Date: Fri,  4 Mar 2022 11:35:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304093524.397485-19-jarkko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220304093524.397485-1-jarkko@kernel.org>

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Enclave pages can be added to an initialized enclave when an address
belonging to the enclave but without a backing page is accessed from
within the enclave.

Accessing memory without a backing enclave page from within an enclave
can be in different ways:
1) Pre-emptively run ENCLU[EACCEPT]. Since the addition of a page
   always needs to be accepted by the enclave via ENCLU[EACCEPT] this
   flow is efficient since the first execution of ENCLU[EACCEPT]
   triggers the addition of the page and when execution returns to the
   same instruction the second execution would be successful as an
   acceptance of the page.

2) A direct read or write. The flow where a direct read or write
   triggers the page addition execution cannot resume from the
   instruction (read/write) that triggered the fault but instead
   the enclave needs to be entered at a different entry point to
   run needed ENCLU[EACCEPT] before execution can return to the
   original entry point and the read/write instruction that faulted.

Add tests for both flows.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 243 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
index ea5f2e064687..13542c5de66f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
@@ -86,6 +86,15 @@ static bool vdso_get_symtab(void *addr, struct vdso_symtab *symtab)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static inline int sgx2_supported(void)
+{
+	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+	__cpuid_count(SGX_CPUID, 0x0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
+
+	return eax & 0x2;
+}
+
 static unsigned long elf_sym_hash(const char *name)
 {
 	unsigned long h = 0, high;
@@ -863,4 +872,238 @@ TEST_F(enclave, epcm_permissions)
 	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test the addition of pages to an initialized enclave via writing to
+ * a page belonging to the enclave's address space but was not added
+ * during enclave creation.
+ */
+TEST_F(enclave, augment)
+{
+	struct encl_op_get_from_addr get_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_put_to_addr put_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_eaccept eaccept_op;
+	size_t total_size = 0;
+	void *addr;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!sgx2_supported())
+		SKIP(return, "SGX2 not supported");
+
+	ASSERT_TRUE(setup_test_encl(ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT, &self->encl, _metadata));
+
+	memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run));
+	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < self->encl.nr_segments; i++) {
+		struct encl_segment *seg = &self->encl.segment_tbl[i];
+
+		total_size += seg->size;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Actual enclave size is expected to be larger than the loaded
+	 * test enclave since enclave size must be a power of 2 in bytes
+	 * and test_encl does not consume it all.
+	 */
+	EXPECT_LT(total_size + PAGE_SIZE, self->encl.encl_size);
+
+	/*
+	 * Create memory mapping for the page that will be added. New
+	 * memory mapping is for one page right after all existing
+	 * mappings.
+	 */
+	addr = mmap((void *)self->encl.encl_base + total_size, PAGE_SIZE,
+		    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
+		    MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, self->encl.fd, 0);
+	EXPECT_NE(addr, MAP_FAILED);
+
+	self->run.exception_vector = 0;
+	self->run.exception_error_code = 0;
+	self->run.exception_addr = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Attempt to write to the new page from within enclave.
+	 * Expected to fail since page is not (yet) part of the enclave.
+	 * The first #PF will trigger the addition of the page to the
+	 * enclave, but since the new page needs an EACCEPT from within the
+	 * enclave before it can be used it would not be possible
+	 * to successfully return to the failing instruction. This is the
+	 * cause of the second #PF captured here having the SGX bit set,
+	 * it is from hardware preventing the page from being used.
+	 */
+	put_addr_op.value = MAGIC;
+	put_addr_op.addr = (unsigned long)addr;
+	put_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_PUT_TO_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&put_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.function, ERESUME);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 14);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, (unsigned long)addr);
+
+	if (self->run.exception_error_code == 0x6) {
+		munmap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
+		SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support adding pages to initialized enclave");
+	}
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0x8007);
+
+	self->run.exception_vector = 0;
+	self->run.exception_error_code = 0;
+	self->run.exception_addr = 0;
+
+	/* Handle AEX by running EACCEPT from new entry point. */
+	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base + PAGE_SIZE;
+
+	eaccept_op.epc_addr = self->encl.encl_base + total_size;
+	eaccept_op.flags = SGX_SECINFO_R | SGX_SECINFO_W | SGX_SECINFO_REG | SGX_SECINFO_PENDING;
+	eaccept_op.ret = 0;
+	eaccept_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_EACCEPT;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&eaccept_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(eaccept_op.ret, 0);
+
+	/* Can now return to main TCS to resume execution. */
+	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(vdso_sgx_enter_enclave((unsigned long)&put_addr_op, 0, 0,
+					 ERESUME, 0, 0,
+					 &self->run),
+		  0);
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Read memory from newly added page that was just written to,
+	 * confirming that data previously written (MAGIC) is present.
+	 */
+	get_addr_op.value = 0;
+	get_addr_op.addr = (unsigned long)addr;
+	get_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_GET_FROM_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(get_addr_op.value, MAGIC);
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	munmap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test for the addition of pages to an initialized enclave via a
+ * pre-emptive run of EACCEPT on page to be added.
+ */
+TEST_F(enclave, augment_via_eaccept)
+{
+	struct encl_op_get_from_addr get_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_put_to_addr put_addr_op;
+	struct encl_op_eaccept eaccept_op;
+	size_t total_size = 0;
+	void *addr;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!sgx2_supported())
+		SKIP(return, "SGX2 not supported");
+
+	ASSERT_TRUE(setup_test_encl(ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT, &self->encl, _metadata));
+
+	memset(&self->run, 0, sizeof(self->run));
+	self->run.tcs = self->encl.encl_base;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < self->encl.nr_segments; i++) {
+		struct encl_segment *seg = &self->encl.segment_tbl[i];
+
+		total_size += seg->size;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Actual enclave size is expected to be larger than the loaded
+	 * test enclave since enclave size must be a power of 2 in bytes while
+	 * test_encl does not consume it all.
+	 */
+	EXPECT_LT(total_size + PAGE_SIZE, self->encl.encl_size);
+
+	/*
+	 * mmap() a page at end of existing enclave to be used for dynamic
+	 * EPC page.
+	 */
+
+	addr = mmap((void *)self->encl.encl_base + total_size, PAGE_SIZE,
+		    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED,
+		    self->encl.fd, 0);
+	EXPECT_NE(addr, MAP_FAILED);
+
+	self->run.exception_vector = 0;
+	self->run.exception_error_code = 0;
+	self->run.exception_addr = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Run EACCEPT on new page to trigger the #PF->EAUG->EACCEPT(again
+	 * without a #PF). All should be transparent to userspace.
+	 */
+	eaccept_op.epc_addr = self->encl.encl_base + total_size;
+	eaccept_op.flags = SGX_SECINFO_R | SGX_SECINFO_W | SGX_SECINFO_REG | SGX_SECINFO_PENDING;
+	eaccept_op.ret = 0;
+	eaccept_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_EACCEPT;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&eaccept_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	if (self->run.exception_vector == 14 &&
+	    self->run.exception_error_code == 4 &&
+	    self->run.exception_addr == self->encl.encl_base + total_size) {
+		munmap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
+		SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support adding pages to initialized enclave");
+	}
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(eaccept_op.ret, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * New page should be accessible from within enclave - attempt to
+	 * write to it.
+	 */
+	put_addr_op.value = MAGIC;
+	put_addr_op.addr = (unsigned long)addr;
+	put_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_PUT_TO_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&put_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Read memory from newly added page that was just written to,
+	 * confirming that data previously written (MAGIC) is present.
+	 */
+	get_addr_op.value = 0;
+	get_addr_op.addr = (unsigned long)addr;
+	get_addr_op.header.type = ENCL_OP_GET_FROM_ADDRESS;
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(ENCL_CALL(&get_addr_op, &self->run, true), 0);
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(get_addr_op.value, MAGIC);
+	EXPECT_EEXIT(&self->run);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_vector, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_error_code, 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(self->run.exception_addr, 0);
+
+	munmap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-04  9:34 [RFC PATCH v2.1 01/30] x86/sgx: Add short descriptions to ENCLS wrappers Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 02/30] x86/sgx: Add wrapper for SGX2 EMODPR function Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 03/30] x86/sgx: Add wrapper for SGX2 EMODT function Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 04/30] x86/sgx: Add wrapper for SGX2 EAUG function Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 05/30] Documentation/x86: Document SGX permission details Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 06/30] x86/sgx: Support VMA permissions more relaxed than enclave permissions Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 07/30] x86/sgx: Add pfn_mkwrite() handler for present PTEs Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 08/30] x86/sgx: Export sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 09/30] x86/sgx: Rename sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask() as sgx_encl_cpumask() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 10/30] x86/sgx: Move PTE zap code to new sgx_zap_enclave_ptes() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 11/30] x86/sgx: Make sgx_ipi_cb() available internally Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 12/30] x86/sgx: Create utility to validate user provided offset and length Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 13/30] x86/sgx: Keep record of SGX page type Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 14/30] x86/sgx: Support restricting of enclave page permissions Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09  8:52   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09  9:35     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09 16:59       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-09 19:10         ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-09 23:35         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-09 23:42           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-10  0:11             ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-10  0:10           ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-10  2:02             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 15/30] selftests/sgx: Add test for EPCM permission changes Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 16/30] selftests/sgx: Add test for TCS page " Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 17/30] x86/sgx: Support adding of pages to an initialized enclave Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 18/30] x86/sgx: Tighten accessible memory range after enclave initialization Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 20/30] x86/sgx: Support modifying SGX page type Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 21/30] x86/sgx: Support complete page removal Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 22/30] Documentation/x86: Introduce enclave runtime management section Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 23/30] selftests/sgx: Introduce dynamic entry point Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 24/30] selftests/sgx: Introduce TCS initialization enclave operation Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 25/30] selftests/sgx: Test complete changing of page type flow Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 26/30] selftests/sgx: Test faulty enclave behavior Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 27/30] selftests/sgx: Test invalid access to removed enclave page Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 28/30] selftests/sgx: Test reclaiming of untouched page Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 29/30] x86/sgx: Free up EPC pages directly to support large page ranges Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 30/30] selftests/sgx: Page removal stress test Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2.1 01/30] x86/sgx: Add short descriptions to ENCLS wrappers Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-04  9:41   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-03-14 19:04 ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220304093524.397485-19-jarkko@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathaniel@profian.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.