All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Alexandru Ardelean" <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 18:37:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220328183701.02884cc3@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207125933.81634-6-paul@crapouillou.net>

On Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:59:26 +0000
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Add the necessary infrastructure to the IIO core to support a new
> optional DMABUF based interface.
> 
> The advantage of this new DMABUF based interface vs. the read()
> interface, is that it avoids an extra copy of the data between the
> kernel and userspace. This is particularly userful for high-speed

useful

> devices which produce several megabytes or even gigabytes of data per
> second.
> 
> The data in this new DMABUF interface is managed at the granularity of
> DMABUF objects. Reducing the granularity from byte level to block level
> is done to reduce the userspace-kernelspace synchronization overhead
> since performing syscalls for each byte at a few Mbps is just not
> feasible.
> 
> This of course leads to a slightly increased latency. For this reason an
> application can choose the size of the DMABUFs as well as how many it
> allocates. E.g. two DMABUFs would be a traditional double buffering
> scheme. But using a higher number might be necessary to avoid
> underflow/overflow situations in the presence of scheduling latencies.
> 
> As part of the interface, 2 new IOCTLs have been added:
> 
> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ALLOC_IOCTL(struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req *):
>  Each call will allocate a new DMABUF object. The return value (if not
>  a negative errno value as error) will be the file descriptor of the new
>  DMABUF.
> 
> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL(struct iio_dmabuf *):
>  Place the DMABUF object into the queue pending for hardware process.
> 
> These two IOCTLs have to be performed on the IIO buffer's file
> descriptor, obtained using the IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL() ioctl.

Just to check, do they work on the old deprecated chardev route? Normally
we can directly access the first buffer without the ioctl.

> 
> To access the data stored in a block by userspace the block must be
> mapped to the process's memory. This is done by calling mmap() on the
> DMABUF's file descriptor.
> 
> Before accessing the data through the map, you must use the
> DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC(struct dma_buf_sync *) ioctl, with the
> DMA_BUF_SYNC_START flag, to make sure that the data is available.
> This call may block until the hardware is done with this block. Once
> you are done reading or writing the data, you must use this ioctl again
> with the DMA_BUF_SYNC_END flag, before enqueueing the DMABUF to the
> kernel's queue.
> 
> If you need to know when the hardware is done with a DMABUF, you can
> poll its file descriptor for the EPOLLOUT event.
> 
> Finally, to destroy a DMABUF object, simply call close() on its file
> descriptor.
> 
> A typical workflow for the new interface is:
> 
>   for block in blocks:
>     DMABUF_ALLOC block
>     mmap block
> 
>   enable buffer
> 
>   while !done
>     for block in blocks:
>       DMABUF_ENQUEUE block
> 
>       DMABUF_SYNC_START block
>       process data
>       DMABUF_SYNC_END block
> 
>   disable buffer
> 
>   for block in blocks:
>     close block

Given my very limited knowledge of dma-buf, I'll leave commenting
on the flow to others who know if this looks 'standards' or not ;)

Code looks sane to me..

> 
> v2: Only allow the new IOCTLs on the buffer FD created with
>     IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h   |  8 +++++
>  include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h   | 29 ++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 94eb9f6cf128..72f333a519bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/cdev.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/poll.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>  
> @@ -1520,11 +1521,65 @@ static int iio_buffer_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +				     struct iio_dmabuf __user *user_buf)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dmabuf dmabuf;
> +
> +	if (!buffer->access->enqueue_dmabuf)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&dmabuf, user_buf, sizeof(dmabuf)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (dmabuf.flags & ~IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_SUPPORTED_FLAGS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return buffer->access->enqueue_dmabuf(buffer, &dmabuf);
> +}
> +
> +static int iio_buffer_alloc_dmabuf(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +				   struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req __user *user_req)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req req;
> +
> +	if (!buffer->access->alloc_dmabuf)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&req, user_req, sizeof(req)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (req.resv)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return buffer->access->alloc_dmabuf(buffer, &req);
> +}
> +
> +static long iio_buffer_chrdev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> +				    unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev_buffer_pair *ib = filp->private_data;
> +	struct iio_buffer *buffer = ib->buffer;
> +	void __user *_arg = (void __user *)arg;
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ALLOC_IOCTL:
> +		return iio_buffer_alloc_dmabuf(buffer, _arg);
> +	case IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL:
> +		/* TODO: support non-blocking enqueue operation */
> +		return iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf(buffer, _arg);
> +	default:
> +		return IIO_IOCTL_UNHANDLED;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations iio_buffer_chrdev_fileops = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  	.llseek = noop_llseek,
>  	.read = iio_buffer_read,
>  	.write = iio_buffer_write,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl = iio_buffer_chrdev_ioctl,
> +	.compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
>  	.poll = iio_buffer_poll,
>  	.release = iio_buffer_chrdev_release,
>  };
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> index e2ca8ea23e19..728541bc2c63 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ struct iio_buffer;
>   *                      device stops sampling. Calles are balanced with @enable.
>   * @release:		called when the last reference to the buffer is dropped,
>   *			should free all resources allocated by the buffer.
> + * @alloc_dmabuf:	called from userspace via ioctl to allocate one DMABUF.
> + * @enqueue_dmabuf:	called from userspace via ioctl to queue this DMABUF
> + *			object to this buffer. Requires a valid DMABUF fd.
>   * @modes:		Supported operating modes by this buffer type
>   * @flags:		A bitmask combination of INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_*
>   *
> @@ -68,6 +71,11 @@ struct iio_buffer_access_funcs {
>  
>  	void (*release)(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>  
> +	int (*alloc_dmabuf)(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +			    struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req *req);
> +	int (*enqueue_dmabuf)(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +			      struct iio_dmabuf *block);
> +
>  	unsigned int modes;
>  	unsigned int flags;
>  };
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h b/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
> index 13939032b3f6..e4621b926262 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,35 @@
>  #ifndef _UAPI_IIO_BUFFER_H_
>  #define _UAPI_IIO_BUFFER_H_
>  
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_SUPPORTED_FLAGS	0x00000000
> +
> +/**
> + * struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req - Descriptor for allocating IIO DMABUFs
> + * @size:	the size of a single DMABUF
> + * @resv:	reserved
> + */
> +struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req {
> +	__u64 size;
> +	__u64 resv;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct iio_dmabuf - Descriptor for a single IIO DMABUF object
> + * @fd:		file descriptor of the DMABUF object
> + * @flags:	one or more IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_* flags
> + * @bytes_used:	number of bytes used in this DMABUF for the data transfer.
> + *		If zero, the full buffer is used.
> + */
> +struct iio_dmabuf {
> +	__u32 fd;
> +	__u32 flags;
> +	__u64 bytes_used;
> +};
> +
>  #define IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL			_IOWR('i', 0x91, int)
> +#define IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ALLOC_IOCTL		_IOW('i', 0x92, struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req)
> +#define IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL		_IOW('i', 0x93, struct iio_dmabuf)
>  
>  #endif /* _UAPI_IIO_BUFFER_H_ */


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Alexandru Ardelean" <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 18:37:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220328183701.02884cc3@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207125933.81634-6-paul@crapouillou.net>

On Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:59:26 +0000
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Add the necessary infrastructure to the IIO core to support a new
> optional DMABUF based interface.
> 
> The advantage of this new DMABUF based interface vs. the read()
> interface, is that it avoids an extra copy of the data between the
> kernel and userspace. This is particularly userful for high-speed

useful

> devices which produce several megabytes or even gigabytes of data per
> second.
> 
> The data in this new DMABUF interface is managed at the granularity of
> DMABUF objects. Reducing the granularity from byte level to block level
> is done to reduce the userspace-kernelspace synchronization overhead
> since performing syscalls for each byte at a few Mbps is just not
> feasible.
> 
> This of course leads to a slightly increased latency. For this reason an
> application can choose the size of the DMABUFs as well as how many it
> allocates. E.g. two DMABUFs would be a traditional double buffering
> scheme. But using a higher number might be necessary to avoid
> underflow/overflow situations in the presence of scheduling latencies.
> 
> As part of the interface, 2 new IOCTLs have been added:
> 
> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ALLOC_IOCTL(struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req *):
>  Each call will allocate a new DMABUF object. The return value (if not
>  a negative errno value as error) will be the file descriptor of the new
>  DMABUF.
> 
> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL(struct iio_dmabuf *):
>  Place the DMABUF object into the queue pending for hardware process.
> 
> These two IOCTLs have to be performed on the IIO buffer's file
> descriptor, obtained using the IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL() ioctl.

Just to check, do they work on the old deprecated chardev route? Normally
we can directly access the first buffer without the ioctl.

> 
> To access the data stored in a block by userspace the block must be
> mapped to the process's memory. This is done by calling mmap() on the
> DMABUF's file descriptor.
> 
> Before accessing the data through the map, you must use the
> DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC(struct dma_buf_sync *) ioctl, with the
> DMA_BUF_SYNC_START flag, to make sure that the data is available.
> This call may block until the hardware is done with this block. Once
> you are done reading or writing the data, you must use this ioctl again
> with the DMA_BUF_SYNC_END flag, before enqueueing the DMABUF to the
> kernel's queue.
> 
> If you need to know when the hardware is done with a DMABUF, you can
> poll its file descriptor for the EPOLLOUT event.
> 
> Finally, to destroy a DMABUF object, simply call close() on its file
> descriptor.
> 
> A typical workflow for the new interface is:
> 
>   for block in blocks:
>     DMABUF_ALLOC block
>     mmap block
> 
>   enable buffer
> 
>   while !done
>     for block in blocks:
>       DMABUF_ENQUEUE block
> 
>       DMABUF_SYNC_START block
>       process data
>       DMABUF_SYNC_END block
> 
>   disable buffer
> 
>   for block in blocks:
>     close block

Given my very limited knowledge of dma-buf, I'll leave commenting
on the flow to others who know if this looks 'standards' or not ;)

Code looks sane to me..

> 
> v2: Only allow the new IOCTLs on the buffer FD created with
>     IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h   |  8 +++++
>  include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h   | 29 ++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 94eb9f6cf128..72f333a519bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/cdev.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/poll.h>
>  #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>  
> @@ -1520,11 +1521,65 @@ static int iio_buffer_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +				     struct iio_dmabuf __user *user_buf)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dmabuf dmabuf;
> +
> +	if (!buffer->access->enqueue_dmabuf)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&dmabuf, user_buf, sizeof(dmabuf)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (dmabuf.flags & ~IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_SUPPORTED_FLAGS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return buffer->access->enqueue_dmabuf(buffer, &dmabuf);
> +}
> +
> +static int iio_buffer_alloc_dmabuf(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +				   struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req __user *user_req)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req req;
> +
> +	if (!buffer->access->alloc_dmabuf)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&req, user_req, sizeof(req)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (req.resv)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return buffer->access->alloc_dmabuf(buffer, &req);
> +}
> +
> +static long iio_buffer_chrdev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> +				    unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev_buffer_pair *ib = filp->private_data;
> +	struct iio_buffer *buffer = ib->buffer;
> +	void __user *_arg = (void __user *)arg;
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ALLOC_IOCTL:
> +		return iio_buffer_alloc_dmabuf(buffer, _arg);
> +	case IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL:
> +		/* TODO: support non-blocking enqueue operation */
> +		return iio_buffer_enqueue_dmabuf(buffer, _arg);
> +	default:
> +		return IIO_IOCTL_UNHANDLED;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations iio_buffer_chrdev_fileops = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  	.llseek = noop_llseek,
>  	.read = iio_buffer_read,
>  	.write = iio_buffer_write,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl = iio_buffer_chrdev_ioctl,
> +	.compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
>  	.poll = iio_buffer_poll,
>  	.release = iio_buffer_chrdev_release,
>  };
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> index e2ca8ea23e19..728541bc2c63 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ struct iio_buffer;
>   *                      device stops sampling. Calles are balanced with @enable.
>   * @release:		called when the last reference to the buffer is dropped,
>   *			should free all resources allocated by the buffer.
> + * @alloc_dmabuf:	called from userspace via ioctl to allocate one DMABUF.
> + * @enqueue_dmabuf:	called from userspace via ioctl to queue this DMABUF
> + *			object to this buffer. Requires a valid DMABUF fd.
>   * @modes:		Supported operating modes by this buffer type
>   * @flags:		A bitmask combination of INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_*
>   *
> @@ -68,6 +71,11 @@ struct iio_buffer_access_funcs {
>  
>  	void (*release)(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>  
> +	int (*alloc_dmabuf)(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +			    struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req *req);
> +	int (*enqueue_dmabuf)(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> +			      struct iio_dmabuf *block);
> +
>  	unsigned int modes;
>  	unsigned int flags;
>  };
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h b/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
> index 13939032b3f6..e4621b926262 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,35 @@
>  #ifndef _UAPI_IIO_BUFFER_H_
>  #define _UAPI_IIO_BUFFER_H_
>  
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_SUPPORTED_FLAGS	0x00000000
> +
> +/**
> + * struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req - Descriptor for allocating IIO DMABUFs
> + * @size:	the size of a single DMABUF
> + * @resv:	reserved
> + */
> +struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req {
> +	__u64 size;
> +	__u64 resv;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct iio_dmabuf - Descriptor for a single IIO DMABUF object
> + * @fd:		file descriptor of the DMABUF object
> + * @flags:	one or more IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_* flags
> + * @bytes_used:	number of bytes used in this DMABUF for the data transfer.
> + *		If zero, the full buffer is used.
> + */
> +struct iio_dmabuf {
> +	__u32 fd;
> +	__u32 flags;
> +	__u64 bytes_used;
> +};
> +
>  #define IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL			_IOWR('i', 0x91, int)
> +#define IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ALLOC_IOCTL		_IOW('i', 0x92, struct iio_dmabuf_alloc_req)
> +#define IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL		_IOW('i', 0x93, struct iio_dmabuf)
>  
>  #endif /* _UAPI_IIO_BUFFER_H_ */


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-28 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 12:59 [PATCH v2 00/12] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of outgoing queue Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-13 18:57   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-13 18:57     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-13 19:25     ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-13 19:25       ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 17:17     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 17:24     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 18:39     ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 18:39       ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29  7:11       ` Nuno Sá
2022-03-29  7:11         ` Nuno Sá
2022-03-28 20:38   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-28 20:38     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support specifying buffer direction Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 17:28     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:37   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-03-28 17:37     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 18:44     ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 18:44       ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 13:36       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-29 13:36         ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 20:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-28 20:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iio: buffer-dma: split iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free() function Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iio: buffer-dma: Use DMABUFs instead of custom solution Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 17:54     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 17:54     ` Christian König
2022-03-28 17:54       ` Christian König
2022-03-28 19:16     ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 19:16       ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 20:58       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-28 20:58         ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iio: buffer-dma: Implement new DMABUF based userspace API Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support " Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iio: core: Add support for cyclic buffers Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: " Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 13:01   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 13:01   ` [PATCH v2 12/12] Documentation: iio: Document high-speed DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 13:01     ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29  8:54     ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29  8:54       ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29  9:47       ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29  9:47         ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 14:07         ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 14:07           ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 17:34           ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 17:34             ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-30  9:22             ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-30  9:22               ` Daniel Vetter
2022-02-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new " Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-13 18:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-15 17:43   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-02-15 17:43     ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29  8:33     ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29  8:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29  9:11       ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29  9:11         ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 14:10         ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 14:10           ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 17:16           ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 17:16             ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-30  9:19             ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-30  9:19               ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220328183701.02884cc3@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.