All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 17/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in Voltage protocol
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220330150551.2573938-18-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330150551.2573938-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Make SCMI Voltage protocol use the common iterator protocol helpers.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c
index 5d58ba724eeb..e1bdce573c4f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c
@@ -112,14 +112,100 @@ static int scmi_init_voltage_levels(struct device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct scmi_volt_ipriv {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct scmi_voltage_info *v;
+};
+
+static void iter_volt_levels_prepare_message(void *message,
+					     unsigned int desc_index,
+					     const void *priv)
+{
+	struct scmi_msg_cmd_describe_levels *msg = message;
+	const struct scmi_volt_ipriv *p = priv;
+
+	msg->domain_id = cpu_to_le32(p->v->id);
+	msg->level_index = cpu_to_le32(desc_index);
+}
+
+static int iter_volt_levels_update_state(struct scmi_iterator_state *st,
+					 const void *response, void *priv)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	u32 flags;
+	const struct scmi_msg_resp_describe_levels *r = response;
+	struct scmi_volt_ipriv *p = priv;
+
+	flags = le32_to_cpu(r->flags);
+	st->num_returned = NUM_RETURNED_LEVELS(flags);
+	st->num_remaining = NUM_REMAINING_LEVELS(flags);
+
+	/* Allocate space for num_levels if not already done */
+	if (!p->v->num_levels) {
+		ret = scmi_init_voltage_levels(p->dev, p->v, st->num_returned,
+					       st->num_remaining,
+					      SUPPORTS_SEGMENTED_LEVELS(flags));
+		if (!ret)
+			st->max_resources = p->v->num_levels;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+iter_volt_levels_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+				  const void *response,
+				  struct scmi_iterator_state *st, void *priv)
+{
+	s32 val;
+	const struct scmi_msg_resp_describe_levels *r = response;
+	struct scmi_volt_ipriv *p = priv;
+
+	val = (s32)le32_to_cpu(r->voltage[st->loop_idx]);
+	p->v->levels_uv[st->desc_index + st->loop_idx] = val;
+	if (val < 0)
+		p->v->negative_volts_allowed = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scmi_voltage_levels_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+				   struct scmi_voltage_info *v)
+{
+	int ret;
+	void *iter;
+	struct scmi_msg_cmd_describe_levels *msg;
+	struct scmi_iterator_ops ops = {
+		.prepare_message = iter_volt_levels_prepare_message,
+		.update_state = iter_volt_levels_update_state,
+		.process_response = iter_volt_levels_process_response,
+	};
+	struct scmi_volt_ipriv vpriv = {
+		.dev = ph->dev,
+		.v = v,
+	};
+
+	iter = ph->hops->iter_response_init(ph, &ops, v->num_levels,
+					    VOLTAGE_DESCRIBE_LEVELS,
+					    sizeof(*msg), &vpriv);
+	if (IS_ERR(iter))
+		return PTR_ERR(iter);
+
+	ret = ph->hops->iter_response_run(iter);
+	if (ret) {
+		v->num_levels = 0;
+		devm_kfree(ph->dev, v->levels_uv);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int scmi_voltage_descriptors_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 					struct voltage_info *vinfo)
 {
 	int ret, dom;
-	struct scmi_xfer *td, *tl;
-	struct device *dev = ph->dev;
+	struct scmi_xfer *td;
 	struct scmi_msg_resp_domain_attributes *resp_dom;
-	struct scmi_msg_resp_describe_levels *resp_levels;
 
 	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, VOLTAGE_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES,
 				      sizeof(__le32), sizeof(*resp_dom), &td);
@@ -127,16 +213,7 @@ static int scmi_voltage_descriptors_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 		return ret;
 	resp_dom = td->rx.buf;
 
-	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, VOLTAGE_DESCRIBE_LEVELS,
-				      sizeof(__le64), 0, &tl);
-	if (ret)
-		goto outd;
-	resp_levels = tl->rx.buf;
-
 	for (dom = 0; dom < vinfo->num_domains; dom++) {
-		u32 desc_index = 0;
-		u16 num_returned = 0, num_remaining = 0;
-		struct scmi_msg_cmd_describe_levels *cmd;
 		struct scmi_voltage_info *v;
 
 		/* Retrieve domain attributes at first ... */
@@ -161,66 +238,14 @@ static int scmi_voltage_descriptors_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 						    v->id, v->name,
 						    SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE);
 
-		cmd = tl->tx.buf;
-		/* ...then retrieve domain levels descriptions */
-		do {
-			u32 flags;
-			int cnt;
-
-			cmd->domain_id = cpu_to_le32(v->id);
-			cmd->level_index = cpu_to_le32(desc_index);
-			ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, tl);
-			if (ret)
-				break;
-
-			flags = le32_to_cpu(resp_levels->flags);
-			num_returned = NUM_RETURNED_LEVELS(flags);
-			num_remaining = NUM_REMAINING_LEVELS(flags);
-
-			/* Allocate space for num_levels if not already done */
-			if (!v->num_levels) {
-				ret = scmi_init_voltage_levels(dev, v,
-							       num_returned,
-							       num_remaining,
-					      SUPPORTS_SEGMENTED_LEVELS(flags));
-				if (ret)
-					break;
-			}
-
-			if (desc_index + num_returned > v->num_levels) {
-				dev_err(ph->dev,
-					"No. of voltage levels can't exceed %d\n",
-					v->num_levels);
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-				break;
-			}
-
-			for (cnt = 0; cnt < num_returned; cnt++) {
-				s32 val;
-
-				val =
-				    (s32)le32_to_cpu(resp_levels->voltage[cnt]);
-				v->levels_uv[desc_index + cnt] = val;
-				if (val < 0)
-					v->negative_volts_allowed = true;
-			}
-
-			desc_index += num_returned;
-
-			ph->xops->reset_rx_to_maxsz(ph, tl);
-			/* check both to avoid infinite loop due to buggy fw */
-		} while (num_returned && num_remaining);
-
-		if (ret) {
-			v->num_levels = 0;
-			devm_kfree(dev, v->levels_uv);
-		}
+		ret = scmi_voltage_levels_get(ph, v);
+		/* Skip invalid voltage descriptors */
+		if (ret)
+			continue;
 
 		ph->xops->reset_rx_to_maxsz(ph, td);
 	}
 
-	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, tl);
-outd:
 	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, td);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.32.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 17/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in Voltage protocol
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220330150551.2573938-18-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330150551.2573938-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Make SCMI Voltage protocol use the common iterator protocol helpers.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c
index 5d58ba724eeb..e1bdce573c4f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c
@@ -112,14 +112,100 @@ static int scmi_init_voltage_levels(struct device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct scmi_volt_ipriv {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct scmi_voltage_info *v;
+};
+
+static void iter_volt_levels_prepare_message(void *message,
+					     unsigned int desc_index,
+					     const void *priv)
+{
+	struct scmi_msg_cmd_describe_levels *msg = message;
+	const struct scmi_volt_ipriv *p = priv;
+
+	msg->domain_id = cpu_to_le32(p->v->id);
+	msg->level_index = cpu_to_le32(desc_index);
+}
+
+static int iter_volt_levels_update_state(struct scmi_iterator_state *st,
+					 const void *response, void *priv)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	u32 flags;
+	const struct scmi_msg_resp_describe_levels *r = response;
+	struct scmi_volt_ipriv *p = priv;
+
+	flags = le32_to_cpu(r->flags);
+	st->num_returned = NUM_RETURNED_LEVELS(flags);
+	st->num_remaining = NUM_REMAINING_LEVELS(flags);
+
+	/* Allocate space for num_levels if not already done */
+	if (!p->v->num_levels) {
+		ret = scmi_init_voltage_levels(p->dev, p->v, st->num_returned,
+					       st->num_remaining,
+					      SUPPORTS_SEGMENTED_LEVELS(flags));
+		if (!ret)
+			st->max_resources = p->v->num_levels;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+iter_volt_levels_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+				  const void *response,
+				  struct scmi_iterator_state *st, void *priv)
+{
+	s32 val;
+	const struct scmi_msg_resp_describe_levels *r = response;
+	struct scmi_volt_ipriv *p = priv;
+
+	val = (s32)le32_to_cpu(r->voltage[st->loop_idx]);
+	p->v->levels_uv[st->desc_index + st->loop_idx] = val;
+	if (val < 0)
+		p->v->negative_volts_allowed = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scmi_voltage_levels_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+				   struct scmi_voltage_info *v)
+{
+	int ret;
+	void *iter;
+	struct scmi_msg_cmd_describe_levels *msg;
+	struct scmi_iterator_ops ops = {
+		.prepare_message = iter_volt_levels_prepare_message,
+		.update_state = iter_volt_levels_update_state,
+		.process_response = iter_volt_levels_process_response,
+	};
+	struct scmi_volt_ipriv vpriv = {
+		.dev = ph->dev,
+		.v = v,
+	};
+
+	iter = ph->hops->iter_response_init(ph, &ops, v->num_levels,
+					    VOLTAGE_DESCRIBE_LEVELS,
+					    sizeof(*msg), &vpriv);
+	if (IS_ERR(iter))
+		return PTR_ERR(iter);
+
+	ret = ph->hops->iter_response_run(iter);
+	if (ret) {
+		v->num_levels = 0;
+		devm_kfree(ph->dev, v->levels_uv);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int scmi_voltage_descriptors_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 					struct voltage_info *vinfo)
 {
 	int ret, dom;
-	struct scmi_xfer *td, *tl;
-	struct device *dev = ph->dev;
+	struct scmi_xfer *td;
 	struct scmi_msg_resp_domain_attributes *resp_dom;
-	struct scmi_msg_resp_describe_levels *resp_levels;
 
 	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, VOLTAGE_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES,
 				      sizeof(__le32), sizeof(*resp_dom), &td);
@@ -127,16 +213,7 @@ static int scmi_voltage_descriptors_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 		return ret;
 	resp_dom = td->rx.buf;
 
-	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, VOLTAGE_DESCRIBE_LEVELS,
-				      sizeof(__le64), 0, &tl);
-	if (ret)
-		goto outd;
-	resp_levels = tl->rx.buf;
-
 	for (dom = 0; dom < vinfo->num_domains; dom++) {
-		u32 desc_index = 0;
-		u16 num_returned = 0, num_remaining = 0;
-		struct scmi_msg_cmd_describe_levels *cmd;
 		struct scmi_voltage_info *v;
 
 		/* Retrieve domain attributes at first ... */
@@ -161,66 +238,14 @@ static int scmi_voltage_descriptors_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 						    v->id, v->name,
 						    SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE);
 
-		cmd = tl->tx.buf;
-		/* ...then retrieve domain levels descriptions */
-		do {
-			u32 flags;
-			int cnt;
-
-			cmd->domain_id = cpu_to_le32(v->id);
-			cmd->level_index = cpu_to_le32(desc_index);
-			ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, tl);
-			if (ret)
-				break;
-
-			flags = le32_to_cpu(resp_levels->flags);
-			num_returned = NUM_RETURNED_LEVELS(flags);
-			num_remaining = NUM_REMAINING_LEVELS(flags);
-
-			/* Allocate space for num_levels if not already done */
-			if (!v->num_levels) {
-				ret = scmi_init_voltage_levels(dev, v,
-							       num_returned,
-							       num_remaining,
-					      SUPPORTS_SEGMENTED_LEVELS(flags));
-				if (ret)
-					break;
-			}
-
-			if (desc_index + num_returned > v->num_levels) {
-				dev_err(ph->dev,
-					"No. of voltage levels can't exceed %d\n",
-					v->num_levels);
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-				break;
-			}
-
-			for (cnt = 0; cnt < num_returned; cnt++) {
-				s32 val;
-
-				val =
-				    (s32)le32_to_cpu(resp_levels->voltage[cnt]);
-				v->levels_uv[desc_index + cnt] = val;
-				if (val < 0)
-					v->negative_volts_allowed = true;
-			}
-
-			desc_index += num_returned;
-
-			ph->xops->reset_rx_to_maxsz(ph, tl);
-			/* check both to avoid infinite loop due to buggy fw */
-		} while (num_returned && num_remaining);
-
-		if (ret) {
-			v->num_levels = 0;
-			devm_kfree(dev, v->levels_uv);
-		}
+		ret = scmi_voltage_levels_get(ph, v);
+		/* Skip invalid voltage descriptors */
+		if (ret)
+			continue;
 
 		ph->xops->reset_rx_to_maxsz(ph, td);
 	}
 
-	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, tl);
-outd:
 	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, td);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.32.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 15:05 [PATCH 00/22] SCMIv3.1 Miscellaneous changes Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix sorting of retrieved clock rates Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Make protocols init fail on basic errors Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-26 15:35   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-26 15:35     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-26 16:25     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-26 16:25       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 10:25       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 10:25         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 12:07         ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 12:07           ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix Base list protocols enumeration Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Validate BASE_DISCOVER_LIST_PROTOCOLS reply Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 10:07   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 10:07     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:45     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 13:45       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 13:55       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:55         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 14:03         ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 14:03           ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Dynamically allocate protocols array Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 10:27   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 10:27     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Make name_get operations return a const Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Check CLOCK_RATE_SET_COMPLETE async reply Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove unneeded NULL termination of clk name Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 09/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Split protocol specific definitions in a dedicated header Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 10/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce a common SCMIv3.1 .extended_name_get helper Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 11/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMIv3.1 extended names protocols support Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15  3:45   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15  3:45     ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15  8:17     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15  8:17       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15  9:40       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15  9:40         ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15 16:10         ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15 16:10           ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15 16:29           ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15 16:29             ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15 17:19             ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15 17:19               ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15 17:32               ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15 17:32                 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15 22:58                 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15 22:58                   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 12/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Parse clock_enable_latency conditionally Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 13/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add iterators for multi-part commands Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 14/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in Sensor protocol Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 15/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMIv3.1 SENSOR_AXIS_NAME_GET support Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-02 14:25   ` Peter Hilber
2022-06-02 14:25     ` Peter Hilber
2022-06-06  8:18     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-06  8:18       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-08  8:40       ` Peter Hilber
2022-06-08  8:40         ` Peter Hilber
2022-06-08  8:49         ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-08  8:49           ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 16/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in Clock protocol Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2022-03-30 15:05   ` [PATCH 17/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in Voltage protocol Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 18/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in Perf protocol Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 19/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMIv3.1 Clock notifications Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 20/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMIv3.1 VOLTAGE_LEVEL_SET_COMPLETE Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 21/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.1 Perf power-cost in microwatts Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 16:46   ` Lukasz Luba
2022-03-30 16:46     ` Lukasz Luba
2022-03-30 15:05 ` [PATCH 22/22] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMIv3.1 PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_SET checks Cristian Marussi
2022-03-30 15:05   ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 13:13   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:13     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:49     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 13:49       ` Cristian Marussi
2022-04-28 13:52       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:52         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:46 ` [PATCH 00/22] SCMIv3.1 Miscellaneous changes Sudeep Holla
2022-04-28 13:46   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-03  8:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-05-03  8:03   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220330150551.2573938-18-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.