All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:31:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511113144.1252729-1-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511112438.1251024-1-javierm@redhat.com>

The platform devices registered by sysfb match with firmware-based DRM or
fbdev drivers, that are used to have early graphics using a framebuffer
provided by the system firmware.

DRM or fbdev drivers later are probed and remove all conflicting framebuffers,
leading to these platform devices for generic drivers to be unregistered.

But the current solution has a race, since the sysfb_init() function could
be called after a DRM or fbdev driver is probed and request to unregister
the devices for drivers with conflicting framebuffes.

To prevent this, disable any future sysfb platform device registration by
calling sysfb_disable(), if a driver requests to remove the conflicting
framebuffers.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---

Changes in v5:
- Move the sysfb_disable() call at conflicting framebuffers again to
  avoid the need of a DRIVER_FIRMWARE capability flag.
- Add Daniel Vetter's Reviewed-by tag again since reverted to the old
  patch that he already reviewed in v2.

Changes in v3:
- Call sysfb_disable() when a DRM dev and a fbdev are registered rather
  than when conflicting framebuffers are removed (Thomas Zimmermann).
- Call sysfb_disable() when a fbdev framebuffer is registered rather
  than when conflicting framebuffers are removed (Thomas Zimmermann).
- Drop Daniel Vetter's Reviewed-by tag since patch changed a lot.

Changes in v2:
- Explain in the commit message that fbmem has to unregister the device
  as fallback if a driver registered the device itself (Daniel Vetter).
- Also explain that fallback in a comment in the code (Daniel Vetter).
- Don't encode in fbmem the assumption that sysfb will always register
  platform devices (Daniel Vetter).
- Add a FIXME comment about drivers registering devices (Daniel Vetter).

 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index 9b035ef4d552..265efa189bcc 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1789,6 +1789,17 @@ int remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 	if (do_free)
 		kfree(a);
 
+	/*
+	 * If a driver asked to unregister a platform device registered by
+	 * sysfb, then can be assumed that this is a driver for a display
+	 * that is set up by the system firmware and has a generic driver.
+	 *
+	 * Drivers for devices that don't have a generic driver will never
+	 * ask for this, so let's assume that a real driver for the display
+	 * was already probed and prevent sysfb to register devices later.
+	 */
+	sysfb_disable();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_conflicting_framebuffers);
-- 
2.35.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 13:31:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511113144.1252729-1-javierm@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511112438.1251024-1-javierm@redhat.com>

The platform devices registered by sysfb match with firmware-based DRM or
fbdev drivers, that are used to have early graphics using a framebuffer
provided by the system firmware.

DRM or fbdev drivers later are probed and remove all conflicting framebuffers,
leading to these platform devices for generic drivers to be unregistered.

But the current solution has a race, since the sysfb_init() function could
be called after a DRM or fbdev driver is probed and request to unregister
the devices for drivers with conflicting framebuffes.

To prevent this, disable any future sysfb platform device registration by
calling sysfb_disable(), if a driver requests to remove the conflicting
framebuffers.

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---

Changes in v5:
- Move the sysfb_disable() call at conflicting framebuffers again to
  avoid the need of a DRIVER_FIRMWARE capability flag.
- Add Daniel Vetter's Reviewed-by tag again since reverted to the old
  patch that he already reviewed in v2.

Changes in v3:
- Call sysfb_disable() when a DRM dev and a fbdev are registered rather
  than when conflicting framebuffers are removed (Thomas Zimmermann).
- Call sysfb_disable() when a fbdev framebuffer is registered rather
  than when conflicting framebuffers are removed (Thomas Zimmermann).
- Drop Daniel Vetter's Reviewed-by tag since patch changed a lot.

Changes in v2:
- Explain in the commit message that fbmem has to unregister the device
  as fallback if a driver registered the device itself (Daniel Vetter).
- Also explain that fallback in a comment in the code (Daniel Vetter).
- Don't encode in fbmem the assumption that sysfb will always register
  platform devices (Daniel Vetter).
- Add a FIXME comment about drivers registering devices (Daniel Vetter).

 drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
index 9b035ef4d552..265efa189bcc 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
@@ -1789,6 +1789,17 @@ int remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
 	if (do_free)
 		kfree(a);
 
+	/*
+	 * If a driver asked to unregister a platform device registered by
+	 * sysfb, then can be assumed that this is a driver for a display
+	 * that is set up by the system firmware and has a generic driver.
+	 *
+	 * Drivers for devices that don't have a generic driver will never
+	 * ask for this, so let's assume that a real driver for the display
+	 * was already probed and prevent sysfb to register devices later.
+	 */
+	sysfb_disable();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_conflicting_framebuffers);
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 11:24 [PATCH v5 0/7] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] firmware: sysfb: Make sysfb_create_simplefb() return a pdev pointer Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:04   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:04     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] firmware: sysfb: Add helpers to unregister a pdev and disable registration Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:24   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:54   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:54     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:01     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:01       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:05       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:05         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:29         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:29           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:02   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:02     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 12:24     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 12:24       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:30   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:47   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:47     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-11 11:57     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:57       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 12:28   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 12:28     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] fbdev: Make sysfb to unregister its own registered devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-05-11 11:31   ` [PATCH v5 5/7] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-06-07 15:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-06-07 15:01     ` Daniel Vetter
2022-06-07 15:41     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] Revert "fbdev: Prevent probing generic drivers if a FB is already registered" Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 11:32   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 17:00   ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-11 17:00     ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-11 17:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-11 17:17       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-11 17:34       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 17:34         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-12 18:32         ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-12 18:32           ` Sam Ravnborg
2022-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Fix some races between sysfb device registration and drivers probe Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 10:48   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 11:10   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 11:10     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-13 11:32     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-13 11:32       ` Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511113144.1252729-1-javierm@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.