From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> To: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, luriwen@kylinos.cn, 15815827059@163.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, huhai <huhai@kylinos.cn>, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Ensure scpi_info is not assigned if the probe fails Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 10:22:43 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220704092243.rzk6l3rhjul4wavq@bogus> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bf21d317-8d4b-e237-86b7-be577b5bc652@kylinos.cn> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:19:56AM +0800, Jackie Liu wrote: > Hi Sudeep. > > Thanks for your patch, It's look good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> > > 在 2022/7/2 00:03, Sudeep Holla 写道: > > When scpi probe fails, at any point, we need to ensure that the scpi_info > > is not set and will remain NULL until the probe succeeds. If it is not > > taken care, then it could result in kernel panic with a NULL pointer > > dereference. > > I think the null pointer reference is not correct. It should be UAF. The > logic is as follows: > Right, I will update the commit message, sorry for that got carried away by the message in the kernel panic. > scpi_info = devm_zalloc > > After that if fails, the address will be released, but scpi_info is not > NULL. Normal, there will be no problem, because scpi_info is alloc by > kzalloc, so even if scpi_info is not NULL, but scpi_info->scpi_ops is > NULL, It still work normally. > > But if another process or thread alloc a new data, if they are same address, > and then it is assigned a value, so wild pointer scpi_info->scpi_ops is not > NULL now, Then, Panic. > I do understand that, I will update the commit log to cover these and thanks for the review. -- Regards, Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> To: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, luriwen@kylinos.cn, 15815827059@163.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, huhai <huhai@kylinos.cn>, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Ensure scpi_info is not assigned if the probe fails Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 10:22:43 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220704092243.rzk6l3rhjul4wavq@bogus> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bf21d317-8d4b-e237-86b7-be577b5bc652@kylinos.cn> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:19:56AM +0800, Jackie Liu wrote: > Hi Sudeep. > > Thanks for your patch, It's look good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> > > 在 2022/7/2 00:03, Sudeep Holla 写道: > > When scpi probe fails, at any point, we need to ensure that the scpi_info > > is not set and will remain NULL until the probe succeeds. If it is not > > taken care, then it could result in kernel panic with a NULL pointer > > dereference. > > I think the null pointer reference is not correct. It should be UAF. The > logic is as follows: > Right, I will update the commit message, sorry for that got carried away by the message in the kernel panic. > scpi_info = devm_zalloc > > After that if fails, the address will be released, but scpi_info is not > NULL. Normal, there will be no problem, because scpi_info is alloc by > kzalloc, so even if scpi_info is not NULL, but scpi_info->scpi_ops is > NULL, It still work normally. > > But if another process or thread alloc a new data, if they are same address, > and then it is assigned a value, so wild pointer scpi_info->scpi_ops is not > NULL now, Then, Panic. > I do understand that, I will update the commit log to cover these and thanks for the review. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 9:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-01 16:03 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: Ensure scpi_info is not assigned if the probe fails Sudeep Holla 2022-07-01 16:03 ` Sudeep Holla 2022-07-04 1:19 ` Jackie Liu 2022-07-04 1:19 ` Jackie Liu 2022-07-04 9:22 ` Sudeep Holla [this message] 2022-07-04 9:22 ` Sudeep Holla 2022-07-06 9:39 ` Sudeep Holla 2022-07-06 9:39 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220704092243.rzk6l3rhjul4wavq@bogus \ --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=15815827059@163.com \ --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --cc=huhai@kylinos.cn \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=liuyun01@kylinos.cn \ --cc=luriwen@kylinos.cn \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.