From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stable@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Lech Perczak <l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH stable 4.19 4.14 4.9] Revert "Revert "char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()""
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:51:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220724145148.664623-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ytz+lo4zRQYG3JUR@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
In 2019, Sergey fixed a lockdep splat with 15341b1dd409 ("char/random:
silence a lockdep splat with printk()"), but that got reverted soon
after from 4.19 because back then it apparently caused various problems.
But the issue it was fixing is still there, and more generally, many
patches turning printk() into printk_deferred() have landed since,
making me suspect it's okay to try this out again.
This should fix the following deadlock found by the kernel test robot:
[ 18.287691] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 18.287692] 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1 Not tainted
[ 18.287693] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 18.287712] stop/202 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 18.287713] (ptrval) (console_owner){..-.}, at: console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287717]
[ 18.287718] but task is already holding lock:
[ 18.287718] (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287722]
[ 18.287722] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 18.287723]
[ 18.287724]
[ 18.287725] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 18.287725]
[ 18.287726] -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}:
[ 18.287729] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287729] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287730] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287731] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (??:?)
[ 18.287732] tty_port_tty_get (??:?)
[ 18.287733] tty_port_default_wakeup (tty_port.c:?)
[ 18.287734] tty_port_tty_wakeup (??:?)
[ 18.287734] uart_write_wakeup (??:?)
[ 18.287735] serial8250_tx_chars (??:?)
[ 18.287736] serial8250_handle_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287737] serial8250_default_handle_irq (8250_port.c:?)
[ 18.287738] serial8250_interrupt (8250_core.c:?)
[ 18.287738] __handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[ 18.287739] handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[ 18.287740] handle_irq_event (??:?)
[ 18.287741] handle_edge_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287742] handle_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287742] do_IRQ (??:?)
[ 18.287743] common_interrupt (entry_32.o:?)
[ 18.287744] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (??:?)
[ 18.287745] uart_write (serial_core.c:?)
[ 18.287746] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287747] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287747] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287748] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287749] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287750] ksys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287750] sys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287751] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287752] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287752]
[ 18.287753] -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
[ 18.287756]
[ 18.287756] -> #0 (console_owner){..-.}:
[ 18.287759] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287760] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287761] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287761] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287762] console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287763] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[ 18.287764] vprintk_default (??:?)
[ 18.287764] vprintk_func (??:?)
[ 18.287765] printk (??:?)
[ 18.287766] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[ 18.287767] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287767] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287768] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287769] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[ 18.287770] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[ 18.287770] __kmalloc (??:?)
[ 18.287771] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287772] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287773] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[ 18.287774] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287775] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287776] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287777] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287778] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287779] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287780] ksys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287780] sys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287781] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287782] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287783]
[ 18.287783] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 18.287784]
[ 18.287785] Chain exists of:
[ 18.287785] console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &(&port->lock)->rlock
[ 18.287789]
[ 18.287790] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 18.287790]
[ 18.287791] CPU0 CPU1
[ 18.287792] ---- ----
[ 18.287792] lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[ 18.287794] lock(&port_lock_key);
[ 18.287814] lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[ 18.287815] lock(console_owner);
[ 18.287817]
[ 18.287818] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 18.287818]
[ 18.287819] 6 locks held by stop/202:
[ 18.287820] #0: (ptrval) (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: ldsem_down_read (??:?)
[ 18.287823] #1: (ptrval) (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}, at: tty_write_lock (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287826] #2: (ptrval) (&o_tty->termios_rwsem/1){++++}, at: n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287830] #3: (ptrval) (&ldata->output_lock){+.+.}, at: process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287834] #4: (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287838] #5: (ptrval) (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning (printk.c:?)
[ 18.287841]
[ 18.287842] stack backtrace:
[ 18.287843] CPU: 0 PID: 202 Comm: stop Not tainted 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1
[ 18.287843] Call Trace:
[ 18.287844] dump_stack (??:?)
[ 18.287845] print_circular_bug.cold+0x78/0x8b
[ 18.287846] check_prev_add+0x66a/0xd20
[ 18.287847] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287848] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287848] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287849] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287850] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287851] console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287851] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287852] ? native_save_fl (??:?)
[ 18.287853] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[ 18.287854] vprintk_default (??:?)
[ 18.287855] vprintk_func (??:?)
[ 18.287855] printk (??:?)
[ 18.287856] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[ 18.287857] ? shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287858] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287858] ? page_address (??:?)
[ 18.287859] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287860] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287861] ? pvclock_clocksource_read (??:?)
[ 18.287862] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[ 18.287862] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[ 18.287863] ? __slab_alloc+0xbc/0x2e0
[ 18.287864] ? native_wbinvd (paravirt.c:?)
[ 18.287865] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[ 18.287865] __kmalloc (??:?)
[ 18.287866] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287867] ? tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287868] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287869] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287869] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[ 18.287870] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287871] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287872] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287873] ? print_dl_stats (??:?)
[ 18.287874] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287874] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287875] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287876] ? tty_write_unlock (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287877] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287877] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287878] ? __fget_light (file.c:?)
[ 18.287879] ksys_write (??:?)
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Lech Perczak <l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ytz+lo4zRQYG3JUR@xsang-OptiPlex-9020
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
drivers/char/random.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index bac4dc501dc4..2be38780a7f7 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ static void __cold process_random_ready_list(void)
#define warn_unseeded_randomness() \
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WARN_ALL_UNSEEDED_RANDOM) && !crng_ready()) \
- pr_notice("%s called from %pS with crng_init=%d\n", \
- __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, crng_init)
+ printk_deferred(KERN_NOTICE "random: %s called from %pS with crng_init=%d\n", \
+ __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, crng_init)
/*********************************************************************
--
2.35.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Lech Perczak <l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH stable 4.19 4.14 4.9] Revert "Revert "char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()""
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:51:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220724145148.664623-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ytz+lo4zRQYG3JUR@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
In 2019, Sergey fixed a lockdep splat with 15341b1dd409 ("char/random:
silence a lockdep splat with printk()"), but that got reverted soon
after from 4.19 because back then it apparently caused various problems.
But the issue it was fixing is still there, and more generally, many
patches turning printk() into printk_deferred() have landed since,
making me suspect it's okay to try this out again.
This should fix the following deadlock found by the kernel test robot:
[ 18.287691] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 18.287692] 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1 Not tainted
[ 18.287693] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 18.287712] stop/202 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 18.287713] (ptrval) (console_owner){..-.}, at: console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287717]
[ 18.287718] but task is already holding lock:
[ 18.287718] (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287722]
[ 18.287722] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 18.287723]
[ 18.287724]
[ 18.287725] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 18.287725]
[ 18.287726] -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}:
[ 18.287729] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287729] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287730] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287731] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (??:?)
[ 18.287732] tty_port_tty_get (??:?)
[ 18.287733] tty_port_default_wakeup (tty_port.c:?)
[ 18.287734] tty_port_tty_wakeup (??:?)
[ 18.287734] uart_write_wakeup (??:?)
[ 18.287735] serial8250_tx_chars (??:?)
[ 18.287736] serial8250_handle_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287737] serial8250_default_handle_irq (8250_port.c:?)
[ 18.287738] serial8250_interrupt (8250_core.c:?)
[ 18.287738] __handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[ 18.287739] handle_irq_event_percpu (??:?)
[ 18.287740] handle_irq_event (??:?)
[ 18.287741] handle_edge_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287742] handle_irq (??:?)
[ 18.287742] do_IRQ (??:?)
[ 18.287743] common_interrupt (entry_32.o:?)
[ 18.287744] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (??:?)
[ 18.287745] uart_write (serial_core.c:?)
[ 18.287746] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287747] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287747] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287748] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287749] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287750] ksys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287750] sys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287751] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287752] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287752]
[ 18.287753] -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
[ 18.287756]
[ 18.287756] -> #0 (console_owner){..-.}:
[ 18.287759] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287760] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287761] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287761] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287762] console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287763] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[ 18.287764] vprintk_default (??:?)
[ 18.287764] vprintk_func (??:?)
[ 18.287765] printk (??:?)
[ 18.287766] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[ 18.287767] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287767] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287768] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287769] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[ 18.287770] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[ 18.287770] __kmalloc (??:?)
[ 18.287771] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287772] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287773] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[ 18.287774] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287775] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287776] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287777] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287778] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287779] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287780] ksys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287780] sys_write (??:?)
[ 18.287781] do_fast_syscall_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287782] entry_SYSENTER_32 (??:?)
[ 18.287783]
[ 18.287783] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 18.287784]
[ 18.287785] Chain exists of:
[ 18.287785] console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &(&port->lock)->rlock
[ 18.287789]
[ 18.287790] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 18.287790]
[ 18.287791] CPU0 CPU1
[ 18.287792] ---- ----
[ 18.287792] lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[ 18.287794] lock(&port_lock_key);
[ 18.287814] lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
[ 18.287815] lock(console_owner);
[ 18.287817]
[ 18.287818] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 18.287818]
[ 18.287819] 6 locks held by stop/202:
[ 18.287820] #0: (ptrval) (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: ldsem_down_read (??:?)
[ 18.287823] #1: (ptrval) (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}, at: tty_write_lock (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287826] #2: (ptrval) (&o_tty->termios_rwsem/1){++++}, at: n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287830] #3: (ptrval) (&ldata->output_lock){+.+.}, at: process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287834] #4: (ptrval) (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287838] #5: (ptrval) (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning (printk.c:?)
[ 18.287841]
[ 18.287842] stack backtrace:
[ 18.287843] CPU: 0 PID: 202 Comm: stop Not tainted 4.19.248-00165-g3d1f971aa81f #1
[ 18.287843] Call Trace:
[ 18.287844] dump_stack (??:?)
[ 18.287845] print_circular_bug.cold+0x78/0x8b
[ 18.287846] check_prev_add+0x66a/0xd20
[ 18.287847] check_prevs_add (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287848] validate_chain+0x84a/0xe00
[ 18.287848] __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287849] lock_acquire (??:?)
[ 18.287850] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287851] console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287851] ? console_unlock (??:?)
[ 18.287852] ? native_save_fl (??:?)
[ 18.287853] vprintk_emit (??:?)
[ 18.287854] vprintk_default (??:?)
[ 18.287855] vprintk_func (??:?)
[ 18.287855] printk (??:?)
[ 18.287856] get_random_u32 (??:?)
[ 18.287857] ? shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287858] shuffle_freelist (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287858] ? page_address (??:?)
[ 18.287859] allocate_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287860] new_slab (slub.c:?)
[ 18.287861] ? pvclock_clocksource_read (??:?)
[ 18.287862] ___slab_alloc+0x6d0/0xb20
[ 18.287862] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[ 18.287863] ? __slab_alloc+0xbc/0x2e0
[ 18.287864] ? native_wbinvd (paravirt.c:?)
[ 18.287865] __slab_alloc+0xd6/0x2e0
[ 18.287865] __kmalloc (??:?)
[ 18.287866] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 18.287867] ? tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287868] tty_buffer_alloc (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287869] __tty_buffer_request_room (tty_buffer.c:?)
[ 18.287869] tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag (??:?)
[ 18.287870] pty_write (pty.c:?)
[ 18.287871] process_output_block (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287872] n_tty_write (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287873] ? print_dl_stats (??:?)
[ 18.287874] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287874] tty_write (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287875] ? n_tty_ioctl (n_tty.c:?)
[ 18.287876] ? tty_write_unlock (tty_io.c:?)
[ 18.287877] __vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287877] vfs_write (??:?)
[ 18.287878] ? __fget_light (file.c:?)
[ 18.287879] ksys_write (??:?)
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Lech Perczak <l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ytz+lo4zRQYG3JUR@xsang-OptiPlex-9020
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
drivers/char/random.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index bac4dc501dc4..2be38780a7f7 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ static void __cold process_random_ready_list(void)
#define warn_unseeded_randomness() \
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WARN_ALL_UNSEEDED_RANDOM) && !crng_ready()) \
- pr_notice("%s called from %pS with crng_init=%d\n", \
- __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, crng_init)
+ printk_deferred(KERN_NOTICE "random: %s called from %pS with crng_init=%d\n", \
+ __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_, crng_init)
/*********************************************************************
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-24 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-24 8:11 [random] 3d1f971aa8: WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency_detected kernel test robot
2022-07-25 16:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-24 14:51 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-07-24 14:51 ` [PATCH stable 4.19 4.14 4.9] Revert "Revert "char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()"" Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220724145148.664623-1-Jason@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.