[PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters

From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>, <yhs@fb.com>,
	<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	<sdf@google.com>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<illusionist.neo@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mykolal@fb.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
	<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
	<colin.i.king@gmail.com>, <asavkov@redhat.com>, <delyank@fb.com>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 17:45:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221126094530.226629-4-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221126094530.226629-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com>

32-bit ARM has four registers to save function parameters,
add test cases to cover additional scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                            | 18 +++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c     |  3 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c     | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index fcb3e6c5e03c..5e8895027f0d 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -551,6 +551,21 @@ struct sock * noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk)
 	return sk;
 }
 
+u64 noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test4(struct sock *sk, u64 a, u64 b, u32 c, u32 d)
+{
+	return a + b + c + d;
+}
+
+u64 noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test5(u64 a, u64 b)
+{
+	return a + b;
+}
+
+u64 noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test6(u32 a, u32 b, u32 c, u32 d, u32 e)
+{
+	return a + b + c + d + e;
+}
+
 struct prog_test_member1 {
 	int a;
 };
@@ -739,6 +754,9 @@ BTF_SET8_START(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test4)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test5)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test6)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release, KF_RELEASE)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index 5af1ee8f0e6e..6a6822e99071 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ static struct kfunc_test_params kfunc_tests[] = {
 	/* success cases */
 	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test1, 12),
 	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test2, 3),
+	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test4, 16),
+	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test5, 7),
+	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test6, 15),
 	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id, 0),
 	TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_get_mem, 42),
 	SYSCALL_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test, 0),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
index f636e50be259..0385ce2d4c6e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@
 extern int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u32 b) __ksym;
 extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test1(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u64 b,
 				  __u32 c, __u64 d) __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test4(struct sock *sk, __u64 a, __u64 b,
+				  __u32 c, __u32 d) __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test5(__u64 a, __u64 b) __ksym;
+extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test6(__u32 a, __u32 b, __u32 c, __u32 d,
+				  __u32 e) __ksym;
 
 extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *sp) __ksym;
 extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p) __ksym;
@@ -17,6 +22,53 @@ extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(__u64 *mem, int len) __ksym;
 extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdwr_buf_size) __ksym;
 extern int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int rdonly_buf_size) __ksym;
 
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test6(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = 1ULL << 32;
+	__u32 ret;
+
+	a = bpf_kfunc_call_test6(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
+	ret = a >> 32;   /* ret should be 0 */
+	ret += (__u32)a; /* ret should be 15 */
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test5(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	__u64 a = 1ULL << 32;
+	__u32 ret;
+
+	a = bpf_kfunc_call_test5(a | 2, a | 3);
+	ret = a >> 32;   /* ret should be 2 */
+	ret += (__u32)a; /* ret should be 7 */
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct bpf_sock *sk = skb->sk;
+	__u64 a = 1ULL << 32;
+	__u32 ret;
+
+	if (!sk)
+		return -1;
+
+	sk = bpf_sk_fullsock(sk);
+	if (!sk)
+		return -1;
+
+	a = bpf_kfunc_call_test4((struct sock *)sk, a | 2, a | 3, 4, 5);
+	ret = a >> 32;   /* ret should be 2 */
+	ret += (__u32)a; /* ret should be 16 */
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 SEC("tc")
 int kfunc_call_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
-- 
2.30.GIT

