From: "Bernhard Rosenkränzer" <bero@baylibre.com> To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 03:33:54 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221129023401.278780-1-bero@baylibre.com> (raw) During the review of my MT8365 support patchset (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/), the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up. This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to true). There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere). There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other chipsets use numbered pins). This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered and marks the property as deprecated. v3: - No functional changes; add recent Reviewed-Bys and Acked-Bys, add linux-gpio to Cc v2: - Deprecate the property instead of removing it completely from schemas - squash some related commits Bernhard Rosenkränzer (7): pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Deprecate pins-are-numbered dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: Deprecate pins-are-numbered arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property ARM: dts: stm32: Remove the pins-are-numbered property .../bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml | 5 ++--- .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml | 7 +++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi | 1 - drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------ drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 5 ----- 17 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) -- 2.38.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bernhard Rosenkränzer" <bero@baylibre.com> To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 03:33:54 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20221129023401.278780-1-bero@baylibre.com> (raw) During the review of my MT8365 support patchset (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/), the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up. This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to true). There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere). There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other chipsets use numbered pins). This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered and marks the property as deprecated. v3: - No functional changes; add recent Reviewed-Bys and Acked-Bys, add linux-gpio to Cc v2: - Deprecate the property instead of removing it completely from schemas - squash some related commits Bernhard Rosenkränzer (7): pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Deprecate pins-are-numbered dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: Deprecate pins-are-numbered arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property ARM: dts: stm32: Remove the pins-are-numbered property .../bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml | 5 ++--- .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml | 7 +++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi | 2 -- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 1 - arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi | 1 - drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------ drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 5 ----- 17 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) -- 2.38.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 2:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-11-29 2:33 Bernhard Rosenkränzer [this message] 2022-11-29 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] pinctrl: stm32: " Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Deprecate pins-are-numbered Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 8:29 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-11-29 8:29 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-11-29 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: " Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:33 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-12-05 13:20 ` Kevin Hilman 2022-12-05 13:20 ` Kevin Hilman 2022-12-16 11:50 ` Matthias Brugger 2022-12-16 11:50 ` Matthias Brugger 2022-11-29 2:34 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] ARM: " Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:34 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:34 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: dts: stm32: Remove the " Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-11-29 2:34 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-12-05 13:21 ` Kevin Hilman 2022-12-05 13:21 ` Kevin Hilman 2023-01-03 7:59 ` Alexandre TORGUE 2023-01-03 7:59 ` Alexandre TORGUE 2022-12-03 9:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property Linus Walleij 2022-12-03 9:22 ` Linus Walleij 2022-12-06 16:25 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2022-12-06 16:25 ` Bernhard Rosenkränzer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20221129023401.278780-1-bero@baylibre.com \ --to=bero@baylibre.com \ --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \ --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \ --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \ --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.