Re: [PATCH V2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: use imx specific hook for find_loaded_rsc_table

From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: use imx specific hook for find_loaded_rsc_table
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:55:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221221105508.3ukfhevdn2fv6aud@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220111033333.403448-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>

Hi,

On 22-01-11, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> If there is a resource table device tree node, use the address as
> the resource table address, otherwise use the address(where
> .resource_table section loaded) inside the Cortex-M elf file.
> 
> And there is an update in NXP SDK that Resource Domain Control(RDC)
> enabled to protect TCM, linux not able to write the TCM space when
> updating resource table status and cause kernel dump. So use the address
> from device tree could avoid kernel dump.
> 
> Note: NXP M4 SDK not check resource table update, so it does not matter
> use whether resource table address specified in elf file or in device
> tree. But to reflect the fact that if people specific resource table
> address in device tree, it means people are aware and going to use it,
> not the address specified in elf file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V2:
>  Update commit message

What is the status of this patch?

Regards,
  Marco

> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 7a096f1891e6..0bd24c937a73 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -499,6 +499,17 @@ static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc
>  	return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table;
>  }
>  
> +static struct resource_table *
> +imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	if (priv->rsc_table)
> +		return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table;
> +
> +	return rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.prepare	= imx_rproc_prepare,
>  	.attach		= imx_rproc_attach,
> @@ -508,7 +519,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.da_to_va       = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
>  	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
>  	.parse_fw	= imx_rproc_parse_fw,
> -	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +	.find_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>  	.get_loaded_rsc_table = imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
>  	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>  	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 