From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] mailbox: mpfs: fix an incorrect mask width Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:37:29 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230120143734.3438755-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230120143734.3438755-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> The system controller registers on PolarFire SoC are 32 bits wide, so 16 + 16 as the first input to GENMASK_ULL() gives a 33 bit wide mask. It probably should have been immediately obvious when it was pointed out during review that the width required using GENMASK_ULL() - but I scarcely knew what I was doing at the time and missed it. The mistake ends up being moot as it is a mask after all, but it is incorrect and should be fixed. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c index 853901acaeec..d37560e91116 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ #define SCB_CTRL_NOTIFY_MASK BIT(SCB_CTRL_NOTIFY) #define SCB_CTRL_POS (16) -#define SCB_CTRL_MASK GENMASK_ULL(SCB_CTRL_POS + SCB_MASK_WIDTH, SCB_CTRL_POS) +#define SCB_CTRL_MASK GENMASK(SCB_CTRL_POS + SCB_MASK_WIDTH - 1, SCB_CTRL_POS) /* SCBCTRL service status register */ @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static int mpfs_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data) } opt_sel = ((msg->mbox_offset << 7u) | (msg->cmd_opcode & 0x7fu)); + tx_trigger = (opt_sel << SCB_CTRL_POS) & SCB_CTRL_MASK; tx_trigger |= SCB_CTRL_REQ_MASK | SCB_STATUS_NOTIFY_MASK; writel_relaxed(tx_trigger, mbox->ctrl_base + SERVICES_CR_OFFSET); -- 2.39.0 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] mailbox: mpfs: fix an incorrect mask width Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:37:29 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230120143734.3438755-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230120143734.3438755-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> The system controller registers on PolarFire SoC are 32 bits wide, so 16 + 16 as the first input to GENMASK_ULL() gives a 33 bit wide mask. It probably should have been immediately obvious when it was pointed out during review that the width required using GENMASK_ULL() - but I scarcely knew what I was doing at the time and missed it. The mistake ends up being moot as it is a mask after all, but it is incorrect and should be fixed. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> --- drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c index 853901acaeec..d37560e91116 100644 --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-mpfs.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ #define SCB_CTRL_NOTIFY_MASK BIT(SCB_CTRL_NOTIFY) #define SCB_CTRL_POS (16) -#define SCB_CTRL_MASK GENMASK_ULL(SCB_CTRL_POS + SCB_MASK_WIDTH, SCB_CTRL_POS) +#define SCB_CTRL_MASK GENMASK(SCB_CTRL_POS + SCB_MASK_WIDTH - 1, SCB_CTRL_POS) /* SCBCTRL service status register */ @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static int mpfs_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data) } opt_sel = ((msg->mbox_offset << 7u) | (msg->cmd_opcode & 0x7fu)); + tx_trigger = (opt_sel << SCB_CTRL_POS) & SCB_CTRL_MASK; tx_trigger |= SCB_CTRL_REQ_MASK | SCB_STATUS_NOTIFY_MASK; writel_relaxed(tx_trigger, mbox->ctrl_base + SERVICES_CR_OFFSET); -- 2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 14:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-01-20 14:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] MPFS system controller/mailbox fixes Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley [this message] 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mailbox: mpfs: fix an incorrect mask width Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mailbox: mpfs: switch to txdone_poll Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mailbox: mpfs: ditch a useless busy check Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: fix some horrible alignment Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: use a consistent completion timeout Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: simplify error handling in mpfs_blocking_transaction() Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: handle timeouts and failed services differently Conor Dooley 2023-01-20 14:37 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20230120143734.3438755-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \ --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.