Re: [PATCH] drm: atmel-hlcdc: Support inverting the pixel clock polarity

From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	rfoss@kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: atmel-hlcdc: Support inverting the pixel clock polarity
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:52:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807165245.GA281773@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807111246.663637a6@xps-13>

Hi Miquel,

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:12:46AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> 
> sam@ravnborg.org wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2023 22:05:15 +0200:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 04:48:43PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > On the SoC host controller, the pixel clock can be:
> > > * standard: data is launched on the rising edge
> > > * inverted: data is launched on the falling edge
> > > 
> > > Some panels may need the inverted option to be used so let's support
> > > this DRM flag.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>  
> > 
> > Hi Miquel,
> > 
> > the patch is:
> > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > 
> > I hope someone else can pick it up and apply it to drm-misc as
> > my drm-misc setup is hopelessly outdated atm.
> 
> I haven't been noticed this patch was picked-up, is your tree still
> outdated or can you take care of it?

I am still hopelessly behind on stuff.
I copied a few people on this mail that I hope can help.

Link to the original patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230609144843.851327-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com/

	Sam