From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:09:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913110939.574c7ec2@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
between commits:
47d4bb6bbcdb ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dpi: Simplify with devm_drm_bridge_add()")
90c95c3892dd ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dpi: Switch to .remove_new() void callback")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c04ca6bbb7ea ("drm/mediatek: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
from the drm-misc tree.
I fixed it up (the latter is the same as 90c95c3892dd) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:09:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913110939.574c7ec2@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
between commits:
47d4bb6bbcdb ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dpi: Simplify with devm_drm_bridge_add()")
90c95c3892dd ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dpi: Switch to .remove_new() void callback")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c04ca6bbb7ea ("drm/mediatek: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
from the drm-misc tree.
I fixed it up (the latter is the same as 90c95c3892dd) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:09:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913110939.574c7ec2@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
between commits:
47d4bb6bbcdb ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dpi: Simplify with devm_drm_bridge_add()")
90c95c3892dd ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dpi: Switch to .remove_new() void callback")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c04ca6bbb7ea ("drm/mediatek: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
from the drm-misc tree.
I fixed it up (the latter is the same as 90c95c3892dd) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 1:09 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2023-09-13 1:09 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-13 1:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-13 9:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-09-13 9:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2023-09-13 9:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-09-13 9:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree (rev3) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-25 23:29 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-06 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-06 1:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-06 11:28 ` Michael Walle
2024-02-06 11:34 ` Dario Binacchi
2023-11-14 0:42 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:36 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:31 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:25 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-14 0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-25 1:41 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-25 1:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-20 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-20 1:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-12 23:58 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-12 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-23 0:43 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-23 0:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-15 1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-15 1:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-14 0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-14 0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-19 1:13 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-19 1:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-05 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-05 23:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-03 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-03 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-05 0:43 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-05 0:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-29 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-29 1:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-10 0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-10 0:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-16 22:29 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-16 22:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28 2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-21 1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-21 1:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-27 1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-27 1:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-27 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-27 1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-27 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-27 1:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-26 0:01 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-26 0:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-02 3:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-02 3:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-29 1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-29 1:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-26 1:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-26 1:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-17 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-17 0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-16 1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-16 1:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-15 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-15 1:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 0:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-21 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-23 0:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-23 8:10 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-23 9:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-23 11:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-23 11:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-23 13:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-23 13:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-23 14:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-23 14:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-23 16:10 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-23 16:10 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-24 7:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-24 7:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2019-01-11 0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-20 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 0:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 0:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-15 3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-15 3:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 0:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 0:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-22 2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-02 2:23 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-02 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-10 2:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-10 2:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-19 1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-23 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-07 1:32 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-07 1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-31 0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-31 0:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-29 23:49 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-29 23:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-16 0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-16 0:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-14 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-14 1:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-14 7:09 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2015-12-14 7:09 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2015-09-12 3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-12 3:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-14 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-14 2:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-03 2:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-03 2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-30 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-30 3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230913110939.574c7ec2@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.