All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 04:59:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230917025945.GF9646@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914-nolibc-syscall-nr-v1-3-e50df410da11@weissschuh.net>

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 06:01:19PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> All symbols created by nolibc are also visible to user code.
> Syscall constants are expected to come from the kernel headers and
> should not be made up by nolibc.
> 
> Refactor the logic to avoid defining syscall numbers.
> Also the new code is easier to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

Yeah that's a good point!

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Willy

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 04:59:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230917025945.GF9646@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914-nolibc-syscall-nr-v1-3-e50df410da11@weissschuh.net>

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 06:01:19PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> All symbols created by nolibc are also visible to user code.
> Syscall constants are expected to come from the kernel headers and
> should not be made up by nolibc.
> 
> Refactor the logic to avoid defining syscall numbers.
> Also the new code is easier to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

Yeah that's a good point!

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-17  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-14 16:01 [PATCH 0/4] tools/nolibc: cleanups for syscall fallbacks Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 16:01 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/nolibc: allow building i386 with multiarch compiler Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 16:01   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  2:49   ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17  2:49     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-14 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] tools/nolibc: avoid unused parameter warnings for ENOSYS fallbacks Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 16:01   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  2:58   ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17  2:58     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17  5:49     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  5:49       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  9:48       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17  9:48         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17 15:07         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17 15:07           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17 15:08           ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17 15:08             ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-14 16:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 16:01   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  2:59   ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-09-17  2:59     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-14 16:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] tools/nolibc: automatically detect necessity to use pselect6 Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-14 16:01   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  3:07   ` Willy Tarreau
2023-09-17  3:07     ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230917025945.GF9646@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.