All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: [patch V4 03/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2023 13:59:38 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231002115902.213619654@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231002115506.217091296@linutronix.de

From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>

Mixed steppings aren't supported on Intel CPUs. Only one patch is required
for the entire system. The caching of micro code blobs which match the
family and model is therefore pointless and in fact it is disfunctional as
CPU hotplug updates use only a single microcode blob, i.e. the one where
*intel_ucode_patch points to.

Remove the microcode cache and make it an AMD local feature.

[ tglx: Save only at the end. Otherwise random microcode ends up in the
  	pointer for early loading ]

Originally-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: Fix the bogus condition - Borislav
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c      |   10 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c     |    2 
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c    |  133 +++++--------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h |   10 --
 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -37,6 +37,16 @@
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
+struct ucode_patch {
+	struct list_head plist;
+	void *data;
+	unsigned int size;
+	u32 patch_id;
+	u16 equiv_cpu;
+};
+
+static LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache);
+
 #define UCODE_MAGIC			0x00414d44
 #define UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE	0x00000000
 #define UCODE_UCODE_TYPE		0x00000001
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ static bool dis_ucode_ldr = true;
 
 bool initrd_gone;
 
-LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache);
-
 /*
  * Synchronization.
  *
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -33,10 +33,10 @@
 static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
 
 /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
-static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
+static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch __read_mostly;
 
 /* last level cache size per core */
-static int llc_size_per_core;
+static int llc_size_per_core __ro_after_init;
 
 /* microcode format is extended from prescott processors */
 struct extended_signature {
@@ -253,74 +253,19 @@ static int has_newer_microcode(void *mc,
 	return intel_find_matching_signature(mc, csig, cpf);
 }
 
-static struct ucode_patch *memdup_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
+static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
 {
-	struct ucode_patch *p;
+	struct microcode_header_intel *p;
 
-	p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ucode_patch), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!p)
-		return NULL;
-
-	p->data = kmemdup(data, size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!p->data) {
-		kfree(p);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-	return p;
-}
-
-static void save_microcode_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, void *data, unsigned int size)
-{
-	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr;
-	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL;
-	bool prev_found = false;
-	unsigned int sig, pf;
-
-	mc_hdr = (struct microcode_header_intel *)data;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &microcode_cache, plist) {
-		mc_saved_hdr = (struct microcode_header_intel *)iter->data;
-		sig	     = mc_saved_hdr->sig;
-		pf	     = mc_saved_hdr->pf;
-
-		if (intel_find_matching_signature(data, sig, pf)) {
-			prev_found = true;
-
-			if (mc_hdr->rev <= mc_saved_hdr->rev)
-				continue;
-
-			p = memdup_patch(data, size);
-			if (!p)
-				pr_err("Error allocating buffer %p\n", data);
-			else {
-				list_replace(&iter->plist, &p->plist);
-				kfree(iter->data);
-				kfree(iter);
-			}
-		}
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * There weren't any previous patches found in the list cache; save the
-	 * newly found.
-	 */
-	if (!prev_found) {
-		p = memdup_patch(data, size);
-		if (!p)
-			pr_err("Error allocating buffer for %p\n", data);
-		else
-			list_add_tail(&p->plist, &microcode_cache);
-	}
+	kfree(intel_ucode_patch);
+	intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
 
+	p = kmemdup(data, size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!p)
 		return;
 
-	if (!intel_find_matching_signature(p->data, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf))
-		return;
-
 	/* Save for early loading */
-	intel_ucode_patch = p->data;
+	intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -332,6 +277,7 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 {
 	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header;
 	struct microcode_intel *patch = NULL;
+	u32 cur_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
 	unsigned int mc_size;
 
 	while (size) {
@@ -341,8 +287,7 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 		mc_header = (struct microcode_header_intel *)data;
 
 		mc_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
-		if (!mc_size ||
-		    mc_size > size ||
+		if (!mc_size || mc_size > size ||
 		    intel_microcode_sanity_check(data, false, MC_HEADER_TYPE_MICROCODE) < 0)
 			break;
 
@@ -354,31 +299,16 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (save) {
-			save_microcode_patch(uci, data, mc_size);
+		/* BSP scan: Check whether there is newer microcode */
+		if (!save && cur_rev >= mc_header->rev)
 			goto next;
-		}
-
 
-		if (!patch) {
-			if (!has_newer_microcode(data,
-						 uci->cpu_sig.sig,
-						 uci->cpu_sig.pf,
-						 uci->cpu_sig.rev))
-				goto next;
-
-		} else {
-			struct microcode_header_intel *phdr = &patch->hdr;
-
-			if (!has_newer_microcode(data,
-						 phdr->sig,
-						 phdr->pf,
-						 phdr->rev))
-				goto next;
-		}
+		/* Save scan: Check whether there is newer or matching microcode */
+		if (save && cur_rev != mc_header->rev)
+			goto next;
 
-		/* We have a newer patch, save it. */
 		patch = data;
+		cur_rev = mc_header->rev;
 
 next:
 		data += mc_size;
@@ -387,6 +317,9 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 	if (size)
 		return NULL;
 
+	if (save && patch)
+		save_microcode_patch(patch, mc_size);
+
 	return patch;
 }
 
@@ -528,26 +461,10 @@ void load_ucode_intel_ap(void)
 	apply_microcode_early(&uci);
 }
 
-static struct microcode_intel *find_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+/* Accessor for microcode pointer */
+static struct microcode_intel *ucode_get_patch(void)
 {
-	struct microcode_header_intel *phdr;
-	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp;
-
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, &microcode_cache, plist) {
-
-		phdr = (struct microcode_header_intel *)iter->data;
-
-		if (phdr->rev <= uci->cpu_sig.rev)
-			continue;
-
-		if (!intel_find_matching_signature(phdr,
-						   uci->cpu_sig.sig,
-						   uci->cpu_sig.pf))
-			continue;
-
-		return iter->data;
-	}
-	return NULL;
+	return intel_ucode_patch;
 }
 
 void reload_ucode_intel(void)
@@ -557,7 +474,7 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
 
 	intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
 
-	p = find_patch(&uci);
+	p = ucode_get_patch();
 	if (!p)
 		return;
 
@@ -601,7 +518,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_
 		return UCODE_ERROR;
 
 	/* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */
-	mc = find_patch(uci);
+	mc = ucode_get_patch();
 	if (!mc) {
 		mc = uci->mc;
 		if (!mc)
@@ -730,7 +647,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_mic
 	uci->mc = (struct microcode_intel *)new_mc;
 
 	/* Save for CPU hotplug */
-	save_microcode_patch(uci, new_mc, new_mc_size);
+	save_microcode_patch(new_mc, new_mc_size);
 
 	pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
 		 cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
@@ -8,16 +8,6 @@
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/microcode.h>
 
-struct ucode_patch {
-	struct list_head plist;
-	void *data;		/* Intel uses only this one */
-	unsigned int size;
-	u32 patch_id;
-	u16 equiv_cpu;
-};
-
-extern struct list_head microcode_cache;
-
 struct device;
 
 enum ucode_state {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-02 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02 11:59 [patch V4 00/30] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 01/30] x86/microcode/32: Move early loading after paging enable Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 02/30] x86/boot/32: Disable stackprotector and tracing for mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 04/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 05/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 06/30] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 07/30] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 08/30] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 09/30] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 10/30] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 11/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 12/30] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 13/30] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_find_matching_signature() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 14/30] x86/microcode/amd: Read revision from hardware in collect_cpu_info_amd() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-04  8:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 15/30] x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-06 13:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 16/30] x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirection Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 17/30] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 18/30] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 19/30] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 11:59 ` [patch V4 20/30] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 21/30] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 22/30] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 23/30] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 24/30] x86/microcode: Replace the all in one rendevouz handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode: Replace the all-in-one rendevous handler tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 25/30] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 26/30] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 27/30] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 28/30] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 29/30] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 12:00 ` [patch V4 30/30] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late-loads Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-09 12:29   ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late loading tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-20 11:37   ` tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-08  8:54 ` [patch V4 00/30] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Qiuxu Zhuo
2023-10-08 13:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-09  5:03     ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2023-10-10  8:00     ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2023-10-10  8:11       ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231002115902.213619654@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.