[PATCH v6 2/5] lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{read,write}()

From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: glider@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	pcc@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, yury.norov@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eugenis@google.com,
	syednwaris@gmail.com, william.gray@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{read,write}()
Date: Fri,  6 Oct 2023 15:45:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231006134529.2816540-3-glider@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006134529.2816540-1-glider@google.com>

Add basic tests ensuring that values can be added at arbitrary positions
of the bitmap, including those spanning into the adjacent unsigned
longs.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

---
This patch was previously called
"lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value()"
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230720173956.3674987-3-glider@google.com/)
and
"lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value_unaligned"
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230713125706.2884502-3-glider@google.com/)

v6:
 - use bitmap API to initialize test bitmaps
 - as requested by Yury Norov, do not check the return value of
   bitmap_read(..., 0)
 - fix a compiler warning on 32-bit systems

v5:
 - update patch title
 - address Yury Norov's comments:
   - rename the test cases
   - factor out test_bitmap_write_helper() to test writing over
     different background patterns;
   - add a test case copying a nontrivial value bit-by-bit;
   - drop volatile

v4:
 - Address comments by Andy Shevchenko: added Reviewed-by: and a link to
   the previous discussion
 - Address comments by Yury Norov:
   - expand the bitmap to catch more corner cases
   - add code testing that bitmap_set_value() does not touch adjacent
     bits
   - add code testing the nbits==0 case
   - rename bitmap_{get,set}_value() to bitmap_{read,write}()

v3:
 - switch to using bitmap_{set,get}_value()
 - change the expected bit pattern in test_set_get_value(),
   as the test was incorrectly assuming 0 is the LSB.
---
 lib/test_bitmap.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index 187f5b2db4cf1..172ecf3292e46 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ __check_eq_uint(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool __init
+__check_eq_ulong(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
+		 const unsigned long exp_ulong, unsigned long x)
+{
+	if (exp_ulong != x) {
+		pr_err("[%s:%u] expected %lu, got %lu\n",
+			srcfile, line, exp_ulong, x);
+		return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
 
 static bool __init
 __check_eq_bitmap(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
@@ -186,6 +197,7 @@ __check_eq_str(const char *srcfile, unsigned int line,
 	})
 
 #define expect_eq_uint(...)		__expect_eq(uint, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define expect_eq_ulong(...)		__expect_eq(ulong, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_bitmap(...)		__expect_eq(bitmap, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_pbl(...)		__expect_eq(pbl, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #define expect_eq_u32_array(...)	__expect_eq(u32_array, ##__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -1222,6 +1234,111 @@ static void __init test_bitmap_const_eval(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(~var != ~BIT(25));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test bitmap should be big enough to include the cases when start is not in
+ * the first word, and start+nbits lands in the following word.
+ */
+#define TEST_BIT_LEN (1000)
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to test bitmap_write() overwriting the chosen byte pattern.
+ */
+static void __init test_bitmap_write_helper(const char *pattern)
+{
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(exp_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	unsigned long w, r, bit;
+	int i, n, nbits;
+
+	/*
+	 * Only parse the pattern once and store the result in the intermediate
+	 * bitmap.
+	 */
+	bitmap_parselist(pattern, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that setting a single bit does not accidentally touch the
+	 * adjacent bits.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) {
+		bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+		bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+		for (bit = 0; bit <= 1; bit++) {
+			bitmap_write(bitmap, bit, i, 1);
+			__assign_bit(i, exp_bitmap, bit);
+			expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap,
+					 TEST_BIT_LEN);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* Ensure setting 0 bits does not change anything. */
+	bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN; i++) {
+		bitmap_write(bitmap, ~0UL, i, 0);
+		expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	}
+
+	for (nbits = BITS_PER_LONG; nbits >= 1; nbits--) {
+		w = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ? 0xdeadbeefdeadbeefUL
+					     : 0xdeadbeefUL;
+		w >>= (BITS_PER_LONG - nbits);
+		for (i = 0; i <= TEST_BIT_LEN - nbits; i++) {
+			bitmap_copy(bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+			bitmap_copy(exp_bitmap, pat_bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+			for (n = 0; n < nbits; n++)
+				__assign_bit(i + n, exp_bitmap, w & BIT(n));
+			bitmap_write(bitmap, w, i, nbits);
+			expect_eq_bitmap(exp_bitmap, bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+			r = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, nbits);
+			expect_eq_ulong(r, w);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static void __init test_bitmap_read_write(void)
+{
+	unsigned char *pattern[3] = {"", "all:1/2", "all"};
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+	unsigned long zero_bits = 0;
+	unsigned long val;
+	int i, pi;
+
+	/*
+	 * Setting/getting zero bytes should not crash the kernel.
+	 * READ_ONCE() prevents constant folding.
+	 */
+	bitmap_write(NULL, 0, 0, READ_ONCE(zero_bits));
+	/* Return value of bitmap_read() is undefined here. */
+	bitmap_read(NULL, 0, READ_ONCE(zero_bits));
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that bitmap_read() reads the same value that was previously
+	 * written, and two consequent values are correctly merged.
+	 * The resulting bit pattern is asymmetric to rule out possible issues
+	 * with bit numeration order.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < TEST_BIT_LEN - 7; i++) {
+		bitmap_zero(bitmap, TEST_BIT_LEN);
+
+		bitmap_write(bitmap, 0b10101UL, i, 5);
+		val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, 5);
+		expect_eq_ulong(0b10101UL, val);
+
+		bitmap_write(bitmap, 0b101UL, i + 5, 3);
+		val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i + 5, 3);
+		expect_eq_ulong(0b101UL, val);
+
+		val = bitmap_read(bitmap, i, 8);
+		expect_eq_ulong(0b10110101UL, val);
+	}
+
+	for (pi = 0; pi < ARRAY_SIZE(pattern); pi++)
+		test_bitmap_write_helper(pattern[pi]);
+}
+#undef TEST_BIT_LEN
+
 static void __init selftest(void)
 {
 	test_zero_clear();
@@ -1237,6 +1354,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void)
 	test_bitmap_cut();
 	test_bitmap_print_buf();
 	test_bitmap_const_eval();
+	test_bitmap_read_write();
 
 	test_find_nth_bit();
 	test_for_each_set_bit();
-- 
2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog

