From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kenechukwu maduechesi <maduechesik@gmail.com>,
shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Add parenthesis to macro arguments
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:13:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310221433.99xPzVri-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020065439.GA3579@ubuntu>
Hi kenechukwu,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-linus]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.6-rc6]
[cannot apply to staging/staging-testing staging/staging-next next-20231020]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/kenechukwu-maduechesi/staging-rts5208-Add-parenthesis-to-macro-arguments/20231020-145549
base: staging/staging-linus
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020065439.GA3579%40ubuntu
patch subject: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Add parenthesis to macro arguments
config: arc-randconfig-001-20231022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231022/202310221433.99xPzVri-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231022/202310221433.99xPzVri-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310221433.99xPzVri-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c:17:
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:42:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
42 | #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:44:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
44 | #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:46:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
46 | #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:48:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
48 | #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:50:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
50 | #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:52:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
52 | #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c: In function 'read_host_reg':
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c:1350:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_readl'; did you mean 'rtsx_dev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1350 | val = rtsx_readl(chip, addr);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
| rtsx_dev
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c: In function 'write_host_reg':
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c:1388:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_writel' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1388 | rtsx_writel(chip, addr, val);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c:16:
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:42:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
42 | #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:44:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
44 | #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:46:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
46 | #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:48:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
48 | #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:50:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
50 | #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:52:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
52 | #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
--
In file included from drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:16:
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:42:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
42 | #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:44:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
44 | #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:46:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
46 | #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:48:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
48 | #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:50:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
50 | #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:52:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
52 | #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c: In function 'sd_check_wp_state':
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c:2278:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_readl'; did you mean 'rtsx_dev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2278 | val = rtsx_readl(chip, RTSX_BIPR);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
| rtsx_dev
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:16:
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:42:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
42 | #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:44:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
44 | #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:46:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
46 | #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:48:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
48 | #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:50:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
50 | #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:52:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
52 | #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c: In function 'rtsx_send_cmd_no_wait':
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:215:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_writel'; did you mean 'vfs_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
215 | rtsx_writel(chip, RTSX_HCBAR, chip->host_cmds_addr);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| vfs_write
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c:18:
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:42:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
42 | #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:44:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
44 | #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:46:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
46 | #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:48:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
48 | #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:50:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
50 | #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:52:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
52 | #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c: In function 'rtsx_enable_card_int':
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c:37:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_readl'; did you mean 'rtsx_dev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
37 | u32 reg = rtsx_readl(chip, RTSX_BIER);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
| rtsx_dev
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c:51:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_writel'; did you mean 'vfs_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
51 | rtsx_writel(chip, RTSX_BIER, reg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| vfs_write
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c:18:
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:42:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
42 | #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:44:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
44 | #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:46:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
46 | #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:48:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
48 | #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:50:27: error: expected parameter name, found "("
50 | #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h:52:26: error: expected parameter name, found "("
52 | #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
| ^
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c: In function 'rtsx_release_cards':
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c:328:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'rtsx_readl'; did you mean 'rtsx_dev'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
328 | chip->int_reg = rtsx_readl(chip, RTSX_BIPR);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
| rtsx_dev
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +42 drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.h
38
39 /*
40 * macros for easy use
41 */
> 42 #define rtsx_writel(chip, (reg), value) \
43 iowrite32(value, (chip)->rtsx->remap_addr + reg)
44 #define rtsx_readl(chip, (reg) \
45 ioread32((chip)->rtsx->remap_addr + reg)
46 #define rtsx_writew(chip, (reg), value) \
47 iowrite16(value, (chip)->rtsx->remap_addr + reg)
48 #define rtsx_readw(chip, (reg)) \
49 ioread16((chip)->rtsx->remap_addr + reg)
50 #define rtsx_writeb(chip, (reg), value) \
51 iowrite8(value, (chip)->rtsx->remap_addr + reg)
52 #define rtsx_readb(chip, (reg)) \
53 ioread8((chip)->rtsx->remap_addr + reg)
54
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-22 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 6:54 [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Add parenthesis to macro arguments kenechukwu maduechesi
2023-10-20 7:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-10-20 7:48 ` Julia Lawall
2023-10-22 6:13 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202310221433.99xPzVri-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maduechesik@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.