All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: soc@kernel.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] riscv: dts: microchip: add the mpfs' system controller qspi & associated flash
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:22:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231025-demystify-iodize-cd93fedfd7ff@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020-unrated-uproar-c911c6185ae9@spud>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2407 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:18:44PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The system controller's flash can be accessed via an MSS-exposed QSPI
> controller sitting, which sits between the mailbox's control & data
> registers. On Icicle, it has an MT25QL01GBBB8ESF connected to it.
> 
> The system controller and MSS both have separate QSPI controllers, both
> of which can access the flash, although the system controller takes
> priority.
> Unfortunately, on engineering sample silicon, such as that on Icicle
> kits, the MSS' QSPI controller cannot write to the flash due to a bug.
> As a workaround, a QSPI controller can be implemented in the FPGA
> fabric and the IO routing modified to connect it to the flash in place
> of the "hard" controller in the MSS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts    | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi       | 17 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> index 90b261114763..2dae3f8f33f6 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> @@ -199,6 +199,27 @@ &syscontroller {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&syscontroller_qspi {
> +	/*
> +	 * The flash *is* there, but Icicle kits that have engineering sample
> +	 * silicon (write?) access to this flash to non-functional. The system
> +	 * controller itself can actually access it, but the MSS cannot write
> +	 * an image there. Instantiating a coreQSPI in the fabric & connecting
> +	 * it to the flash instead should work though. Pre-production or later
> +	 * silicon does not have this issue.
> +	 */
> +	status = "disabled";
> +
> +	sys_ctrl_flash: flash@0 { // MT25QL01GBBB8ESF-0SIT
> +		compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		spi-max-frequency = <20000000>;
> +		spi-rx-bus-width = <1>;
> +		reg = <0>;
> +	};
> +};

Hmm, I think I will drop this part of the patch, and instead add the
flash for the sev-kit (which does work correctly) to avoid any confusion
as to why this is not supported on the current icicle kit boards.

Cheers,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: soc@kernel.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] riscv: dts: microchip: add the mpfs' system controller qspi & associated flash
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:22:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231025-demystify-iodize-cd93fedfd7ff@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020-unrated-uproar-c911c6185ae9@spud>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2407 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:18:44PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The system controller's flash can be accessed via an MSS-exposed QSPI
> controller sitting, which sits between the mailbox's control & data
> registers. On Icicle, it has an MT25QL01GBBB8ESF connected to it.
> 
> The system controller and MSS both have separate QSPI controllers, both
> of which can access the flash, although the system controller takes
> priority.
> Unfortunately, on engineering sample silicon, such as that on Icicle
> kits, the MSS' QSPI controller cannot write to the flash due to a bug.
> As a workaround, a QSPI controller can be implemented in the FPGA
> fabric and the IO routing modified to connect it to the flash in place
> of the "hard" controller in the MSS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts    | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi       | 17 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> index 90b261114763..2dae3f8f33f6 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> @@ -199,6 +199,27 @@ &syscontroller {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&syscontroller_qspi {
> +	/*
> +	 * The flash *is* there, but Icicle kits that have engineering sample
> +	 * silicon (write?) access to this flash to non-functional. The system
> +	 * controller itself can actually access it, but the MSS cannot write
> +	 * an image there. Instantiating a coreQSPI in the fabric & connecting
> +	 * it to the flash instead should work though. Pre-production or later
> +	 * silicon does not have this issue.
> +	 */
> +	status = "disabled";
> +
> +	sys_ctrl_flash: flash@0 { // MT25QL01GBBB8ESF-0SIT
> +		compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		spi-max-frequency = <20000000>;
> +		spi-rx-bus-width = <1>;
> +		reg = <0>;
> +	};
> +};

Hmm, I think I will drop this part of the patch, and instead add the
flash for the sev-kit (which does work correctly) to avoid any confusion
as to why this is not supported on the current icicle kit boards.

Cheers,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-25 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-20 13:18 [PATCH v3 0/6] PolarFire SoC Auto Update Support Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: soc: microchip: add a property for system controller flash Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] soc: microchip: mpfs: enable access to the system controller's flash Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] soc: microchip: mpfs: print service status in warning message Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] soc: microchip: mpfs: add auto-update subdev to system controller Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] firmware: microchip: add PolarFire SoC Auto Update support Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] riscv: dts: microchip: add the mpfs' system controller qspi & associated flash Conor Dooley
2023-10-20 13:18   ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-25 12:22   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-10-25 12:22     ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] PolarFire SoC Auto Update Support Conor Dooley
2023-12-06 12:25   ` Conor Dooley
2023-12-21 17:41 ` patchwork-bot+linux-soc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231025-demystify-iodize-cd93fedfd7ff@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.