All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write only after srst_udelay
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:48:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023112440-handiness-surely-6675@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124104133.19100-1-tony@atomide.com>

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Commit 34539b442b3b ("bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write on enable before
> reset") caused a regression reproducable on omap4 duovero where the ISS
> target module can produce interconnect errors on boot. Turns out the
> registers are not accessible until after a delay for devices needing
> a ti,sysc-delay-us value.
> 
> Let's fix this by flushing the posted write only after the reset delay.
> We do flushing also for ti,sysc-delay-us using devices as that should
> trigger an interconnect error if the delay is not properly configured.
> 
> Let's also add some comments while at it.
> 
> Fixes: 34539b442b3b ("bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write on enable before reset")
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write only after srst_udelay
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:48:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023112440-handiness-surely-6675@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124104133.19100-1-tony@atomide.com>

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Commit 34539b442b3b ("bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write on enable before
> reset") caused a regression reproducable on omap4 duovero where the ISS
> target module can produce interconnect errors on boot. Turns out the
> registers are not accessible until after a delay for devices needing
> a ti,sysc-delay-us value.
> 
> Let's fix this by flushing the posted write only after the reset delay.
> We do flushing also for ti,sysc-delay-us using devices as that should
> trigger an interconnect error if the delay is not properly configured.
> 
> Let's also add some comments while at it.
> 
> Fixes: 34539b442b3b ("bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write on enable before reset")
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-24 10:41 [PATCH] bus: ti-sysc: Flush posted write only after srst_udelay Tony Lindgren
2023-11-24 10:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-11-24 11:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-11-24 11:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023112440-handiness-surely-6675@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=d-gole@ti.com \
    --cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.