All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
To: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Oleksandr Andrushchenko" <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>,
	"Volodymyr Babchuk" <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	"Stewart Hildebrand" <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12.1 09/15] vpci/header: program p2m with guest BAR view
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 15:49:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240112204948.694115-1-stewart.hildebrand@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009f9287-d4cf-4008-8b47-59825c6510bf@amd.com>

From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>

Take into account guest's BAR view and program its p2m accordingly:
gfn is guest's view of the BAR and mfn is the physical BAR value.
This way hardware domain sees physical BAR values and guest sees
emulated ones.

Hardware domain continues getting the BARs identity mapped, while for
domUs the BARs are mapped at the requested guest address without
modifying the BAR address in the device PCI config space.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
In v12.1:
- ASSERT(rangeset_is_empty()) in modify_bars()
- Fixup print format in modify_bars()
- Make comment single line in bar_write()
- Add Roger's R-b
In v12:
- Update guest_addr in rom_write()
- Use unsigned long for start_mfn and map_mfn to reduce mfn_x() calls
- Use existing vmsix_table_*() functions
- Change vmsix_table_base() to use .guest_addr
In v11:
- Add vmsix_guest_table_addr() and vmsix_guest_table_base() functions
  to access guest's view of the VMSIx tables.
- Use MFN (not GFN) to check access permissions
- Move page offset check to this patch
- Call rangeset_remove_range() with correct parameters
In v10:
- Moved GFN variable definition outside the loop in map_range()
- Updated printk error message in map_range()
- Now BAR address is always stored in bar->guest_addr, even for
  HW dom, this removes bunch of ugly is_hwdom() checks in modify_bars()
- vmsix_table_base() now uses .guest_addr instead of .addr
In v9:
- Extended the commit message
- Use bar->guest_addr in modify_bars
- Extended printk error message in map_range
- Moved map_data initialization so .bar can be initialized during declaration
Since v5:
- remove debug print in map_range callback
- remove "identity" from the debug print
Since v4:
- moved start_{gfn|mfn} calculation into map_range
- pass vpci_bar in the map_data instead of start_{gfn|mfn}
- s/guest_addr/guest_reg
Since v3:
- updated comment (Roger)
- removed gfn_add(map->start_gfn, rc); which is wrong
- use v->domain instead of v->vpci.pdev->domain
- removed odd e.g. in comment
- s/d%d/%pd in altered code
- use gdprintk for map/unmap logs
Since v2:
- improve readability for data.start_gfn and restructure ?: construct
Since v1:
 - s/MSI/MSI-X in comments
---
 xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 xen/include/xen/vpci.h    |  3 +-
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
index feccd070ddd0..f1e366bb5fc6 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 
 struct map_data {
     struct domain *d;
+    const struct vpci_bar *bar;
     bool map;
 };
 
@@ -41,13 +42,24 @@ static int cf_check map_range(
     unsigned long s, unsigned long e, void *data, unsigned long *c)
 {
     const struct map_data *map = data;
+    /* Start address of the BAR as seen by the guest. */
+    unsigned long start_gfn = PFN_DOWN(map->bar->guest_addr);
+    /* Physical start address of the BAR. */
+    unsigned long start_mfn = PFN_DOWN(map->bar->addr);
     int rc;
 
     for ( ; ; )
     {
         unsigned long size = e - s + 1;
+        /*
+         * Ranges to be mapped don't always start at the BAR start address, as
+         * there can be holes or partially consumed ranges. Account for the
+         * offset of the current address from the BAR start.
+         */
+        unsigned long map_mfn = start_mfn + s - start_gfn;
+        unsigned long m_end = map_mfn + size - 1;
 
-        if ( !iomem_access_permitted(map->d, s, e) )
+        if ( !iomem_access_permitted(map->d, map_mfn, m_end) )
         {
             printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
                    "%pd denied access to MMIO range [%#lx, %#lx]\n",
@@ -55,7 +67,8 @@ static int cf_check map_range(
             return -EPERM;
         }
 
-        rc = xsm_iomem_mapping(XSM_HOOK, map->d, s, e, map->map);
+        rc = xsm_iomem_mapping(XSM_HOOK, map->d, map_mfn, m_end,
+                               map->map);
         if ( rc )
         {
             printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
@@ -73,8 +86,8 @@ static int cf_check map_range(
          * - {un}map_mmio_regions doesn't support preemption.
          */
 
-        rc = map->map ? map_mmio_regions(map->d, _gfn(s), size, _mfn(s))
-                      : unmap_mmio_regions(map->d, _gfn(s), size, _mfn(s));
+        rc = map->map ? map_mmio_regions(map->d, _gfn(s), size, _mfn(map_mfn))
+                      : unmap_mmio_regions(map->d, _gfn(s), size, _mfn(map_mfn));
         if ( rc == 0 )
         {
             *c += size;
@@ -83,8 +96,9 @@ static int cf_check map_range(
         if ( rc < 0 )
         {
             printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
-                   "Failed to identity %smap [%lx, %lx] for d%d: %d\n",
-                   map->map ? "" : "un", s, e, map->d->domain_id, rc);
+                   "Failed to %smap [%lx %lx] -> [%lx %lx] for %pd: %d\n",
+                   map->map ? "" : "un", s, e, map_mfn,
+                   map_mfn + size, map->d, rc);
             break;
         }
         ASSERT(rc < size);
@@ -163,10 +177,6 @@ static void modify_decoding(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd,
 bool vpci_process_pending(struct vcpu *v)
 {
     struct pci_dev *pdev = v->vpci.pdev;
-    struct map_data data = {
-        .d = v->domain,
-        .map = v->vpci.cmd & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY,
-    };
     struct vpci_header *header = NULL;
     unsigned int i;
 
@@ -186,6 +196,11 @@ bool vpci_process_pending(struct vcpu *v)
     for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
     {
         struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
+        struct map_data data = {
+            .d = v->domain,
+            .map = v->vpci.cmd & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY,
+            .bar = bar,
+        };
         int rc;
 
         if ( rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem) )
@@ -236,7 +251,6 @@ bool vpci_process_pending(struct vcpu *v)
 static int __init apply_map(struct domain *d, const struct pci_dev *pdev,
                             uint16_t cmd)
 {
-    struct map_data data = { .d = d, .map = true };
     struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
     int rc = 0;
     unsigned int i;
@@ -246,6 +260,7 @@ static int __init apply_map(struct domain *d, const struct pci_dev *pdev,
     for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
     {
         struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
+        struct map_data data = { .d = d, .map = true, .bar = bar };
 
         if ( rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem) )
             continue;
@@ -311,12 +326,16 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
      * First fill the rangesets with the BAR of this device or with the ROM
      * BAR only, depending on whether the guest is toggling the memory decode
      * bit of the command register, or the enable bit of the ROM BAR register.
+     *
+     * For non-hardware domain we use guest physical addresses.
      */
     for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
     {
         struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
         unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(bar->addr);
         unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(bar->addr + bar->size - 1);
+        unsigned long start_guest = PFN_DOWN(bar->guest_addr);
+        unsigned long end_guest = PFN_DOWN(bar->guest_addr + bar->size - 1);
 
         if ( !bar->mem )
             continue;
@@ -336,11 +355,26 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
             continue;
         }
 
-        rc = rangeset_add_range(bar->mem, start, end);
+        ASSERT(rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem));
+
+        /*
+         * Make sure that the guest set address has the same page offset
+         * as the physical address on the host or otherwise things won't work as
+         * expected.
+         */
+        if ( PAGE_OFFSET(bar->guest_addr) != PAGE_OFFSET(bar->addr) )
+        {
+            gprintk(XENLOG_G_WARNING,
+                    "%pp: Can't map BAR%u due to offset mismatch: %#lx vs %#lx\n",
+                    &pdev->sbdf, i, bar->guest_addr, bar->addr);
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
+
+        rc = rangeset_add_range(bar->mem, start_guest, end_guest);
         if ( rc )
         {
             printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING "Failed to add [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
-                   start, end, rc);
+                   start_guest, end_guest, rc);
             return rc;
         }
 
@@ -352,12 +386,12 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
             if ( rangeset_is_empty(prev_bar->mem) )
                 continue;
 
-            rc = rangeset_remove_range(prev_bar->mem, start, end);
+            rc = rangeset_remove_range(prev_bar->mem, start_guest, end_guest);
             if ( rc )
             {
                 gprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
                        "%pp: failed to remove overlapping range [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
-                        &pdev->sbdf, start, end, rc);
+                        &pdev->sbdf, start_guest, end_guest, rc);
                 return rc;
             }
         }
@@ -425,8 +459,8 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
             for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tmp->vpci->header.bars); i++ )
             {
                 const struct vpci_bar *remote_bar = &tmp->vpci->header.bars[i];
-                unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(remote_bar->addr);
-                unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(remote_bar->addr +
+                unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(remote_bar->guest_addr);
+                unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(remote_bar->guest_addr +
                                              remote_bar->size - 1);
 
                 if ( !remote_bar->enabled )
@@ -513,6 +547,8 @@ static void cf_check bar_write(
     struct vpci_bar *bar = data;
     bool hi = false;
 
+    ASSERT(is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain));
+
     if ( bar->type == VPCI_BAR_MEM64_HI )
     {
         ASSERT(reg > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
@@ -543,6 +579,8 @@ static void cf_check bar_write(
      */
     bar->addr &= ~(0xffffffffULL << (hi ? 32 : 0));
     bar->addr |= (uint64_t)val << (hi ? 32 : 0);
+    /* Update guest address, so hardware domain BAR is identity mapped. */
+    bar->guest_addr = bar->addr;
 
     /* Make sure Xen writes back the same value for the BAR RO bits. */
     if ( !hi )
@@ -639,11 +677,14 @@ static void cf_check rom_write(
     }
 
     if ( !rom->enabled )
+    {
         /*
          * If the ROM BAR is not mapped update the address field so the
          * correct address is mapped into the p2m.
          */
         rom->addr = val & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
+        rom->guest_addr = rom->addr;
+    }
 
     if ( !header->bars_mapped || rom->enabled == new_enabled )
     {
@@ -667,7 +708,10 @@ static void cf_check rom_write(
         return;
 
     if ( !new_enabled )
+    {
         rom->addr = val & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
+        rom->guest_addr = rom->addr;
+    }
 }
 
 static int bar_add_rangeset(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct vpci_bar *bar,
@@ -862,6 +906,7 @@ static int cf_check init_header(struct pci_dev *pdev)
         }
 
         bars[i].addr = addr;
+        bars[i].guest_addr = addr;
         bars[i].size = size;
         bars[i].prefetchable = val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
 
@@ -884,6 +929,7 @@ static int cf_check init_header(struct pci_dev *pdev)
         rom->type = VPCI_BAR_ROM;
         rom->size = size;
         rom->addr = addr;
+        rom->guest_addr = addr;
         header->rom_enabled = pci_conf_read32(pdev->sbdf, rom_reg) &
                               PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE;
 
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
index 817ee9ee7300..e89c571890b2 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ int vpci_msix_arch_print(const struct vpci_msix *msix);
  */
 static inline paddr_t vmsix_table_base(const struct vpci *vpci, unsigned int nr)
 {
-    return vpci->header.bars[vpci->msix->tables[nr] & PCI_MSIX_BIRMASK].addr;
+    return vpci->header.bars[vpci->msix->tables[nr] &
+                             PCI_MSIX_BIRMASK].guest_addr;
 }
 
 static inline paddr_t vmsix_table_addr(const struct vpci *vpci, unsigned int nr)
-- 
2.43.0



  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-12 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09 21:51 [PATCH v12 00/15] PCI devices passthrough on Arm, part 3 Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] vpci: use per-domain PCI lock to protect vpci structure Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-12 13:48   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-12 17:54     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-12 18:14       ` [PATCH v12.1 " Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-15  8:58         ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-15 15:42           ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-15  8:53       ` [PATCH v12 " Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-15 15:08         ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-15 19:43   ` [PATCH v12.2 " Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-19 13:42     ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-23 14:26     ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-23 15:23       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-24  8:56         ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-24  9:39           ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-23 14:29     ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-24  5:07       ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-24  8:21         ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-24 20:21           ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-24  8:50         ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-23 14:32     ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-23 15:07       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-24  5:00         ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-30 14:59           ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-24  8:48         ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-24  9:24           ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-24 11:34             ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-24 17:51               ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-25  7:43                 ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-25  9:05                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-25 11:23                     ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-25 12:33                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-30 15:04                         ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] vpci: restrict unhandled read/write operations for guests Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] vpci: add hooks for PCI device assign/de-assign Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-23 14:36   ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-30 19:22   ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] vpci/header: rework exit path in init_header() Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] vpci/header: implement guest BAR register handlers Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] rangeset: add RANGESETF_no_print flag Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] rangeset: add rangeset_purge() function Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-10 10:00   ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] vpci/header: handle p2m range sets per BAR Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] vpci/header: program p2m with guest BAR view Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-12 15:06   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-12 20:31     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-12 20:49       ` Stewart Hildebrand [this message]
2024-01-15  9:07     ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-15 19:03       ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-15 19:44   ` [PATCH v12.2 " Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-17  3:01     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-19 13:43       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-01-19 14:28   ` [PATCH v12.3 " Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] vpci/header: emulate PCI_COMMAND register for guests Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-25 15:43   ` Jan Beulich
2024-02-01  4:50     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-02-01  8:14       ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] vpci: add initial support for virtual PCI bus topology Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-12 11:46   ` George Dunlap
2024-01-12 13:50     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-15 11:48       ` George Dunlap
2024-01-25 16:00   ` Jan Beulich
2024-02-02  3:30     ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] xen/arm: translate virtual PCI bus topology for guests Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] xen/arm: account IO handlers for emulated PCI MSI-X Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] xen/arm: vpci: permit access to guest vpci space Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-17  3:03   ` Stewart Hildebrand
2024-01-09 21:51 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] arm/vpci: honor access size when returning an error Stewart Hildebrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240112204948.694115-1-stewart.hildebrand@amd.com \
    --to=stewart.hildebrand@amd.com \
    --cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
    --cc=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.