All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	daniel.vetter@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:38:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2521657.mCnHBphecV@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160913202350.GA30707@amd>

Hi.

Am Dienstag, 13. September 2016, 22:23:50 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek: 
> I have
> 
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset
> Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation 
Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0126] (rev 09)

Phoronix Test Suite system-info:

System Information

Hardware:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2520M @ 3.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 
42433WG, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM, Memory: 16384MB, 
Disk: 300GB INTEL SSDSA2CW30 + 480GB Crucial_CT480M50, Graphics: Intel 2nd 
Generation Core Family IGP, Audio: Conexant CX20590, Monitor: P24T-7 LED, 
Network: Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205

Software:
OS: Debian unstable, Kernel: 4.8.0-rc6-tp520-btrfstrim+ (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 
Frameworks 5, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: modesetting 
1.18.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 12.0.2, Compiler: GCC 6.2.0 20160901, File-System: 
btrfs, Screen Resolution: 3840x1080

> In previous kernels, resume worked ok. With 4.8-rc1, I quite often (1
> in 10 resumes?) get in state where primary monitor (DVI) is dead (in
> powersave) and all windows move to secondary monitor (VGA). Running
> "xrandr" fixes that.

I have seen this in 4.8 up to rc5 as well. I am not sure yet about rc6 which I 
am currently running.

I didn´t run xrandr by hand. But I ran systemsettings, dragged the second, 
deactivated external display back beneath the internal laptop display, 
activated it again and applied this changes. I think this has a somewhat 
similar effect as Plasma uses RANDR as well.
 
> I'll update to newer rc and see if it happens again, but if you have
> any ideas, now would be good time.

No ideas, sorry.

Thanks,
-- 
Martin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: Re: 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:38:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2521657.mCnHBphecV@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160913202350.GA30707@amd>

Hi.

Am Dienstag, 13. September 2016, 22:23:50 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek: 
> I have
> 
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset
> Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation 
Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0126] (rev 09)

Phoronix Test Suite system-info:

System Information

Hardware:
Processor: Intel Core i5-2520M @ 3.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 
42433WG, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM, Memory: 16384MB, 
Disk: 300GB INTEL SSDSA2CW30 + 480GB Crucial_CT480M50, Graphics: Intel 2nd 
Generation Core Family IGP, Audio: Conexant CX20590, Monitor: P24T-7 LED, 
Network: Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205

Software:
OS: Debian unstable, Kernel: 4.8.0-rc6-tp520-btrfstrim+ (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 
Frameworks 5, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: modesetting 
1.18.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 12.0.2, Compiler: GCC 6.2.0 20160901, File-System: 
btrfs, Screen Resolution: 3840x1080

> In previous kernels, resume worked ok. With 4.8-rc1, I quite often (1
> in 10 resumes?) get in state where primary monitor (DVI) is dead (in
> powersave) and all windows move to secondary monitor (VGA). Running
> "xrandr" fixes that.

I have seen this in 4.8 up to rc5 as well. I am not sure yet about rc6 which I 
am currently running.

I didn´t run xrandr by hand. But I ran systemsettings, dragged the second, 
deactivated external display back beneath the internal laptop display, 
activated it again and applied this changes. I think this has a somewhat 
similar effect as Plasma uses RANDR as well.
 
> I'll update to newer rc and see if it happens again, but if you have
> any ideas, now would be good time.

No ideas, sorry.

Thanks,
-- 
Martin
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-13 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13 20:23 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume Pavel Machek
2016-09-13 20:38 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2016-09-13 20:38   ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-14  7:43   ` Pavel Machek
2016-09-14  7:43     ` Pavel Machek
2016-09-14 10:03     ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-13 21:04 ` Pavel Machek
2016-09-14  7:38   ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-14  7:38     ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-14  7:45     ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-14  7:45       ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-14  7:54     ` Pavel Machek
2016-09-14  7:54       ` Pavel Machek
2016-09-14  9:17       ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-14 11:14         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-14 11:14           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-15 15:34           ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-15 15:34             ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-16  6:57             ` Jani Nikula
2016-10-18 14:13           ` Pavel Machek
2016-10-18 14:13             ` Pavel Machek
2016-09-14 11:32         ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-14 11:32           ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-09-14 10:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2521657.mCnHBphecV@merkaba \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.