All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	<chenhuacai@kernel.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	<anup@brainfault.org>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	<palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	<willy@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<paul@paul-moore.com>, <jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	<tabba@google.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	<yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>, <vannapurve@google.com>,
	<mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	<david@redhat.com>, <qperret@google.com>, <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	<wei.w.wang@intel.com>, <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
	<isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 12/29] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:53:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <253965df-6d80-bbfd-ab01-f9e69b274bf3@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqzttsiu67n.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>



On 8/28/2023 3:56 PM, Ackerley Tng wrote:
 > 1. Since the physical memory's representation is the inode and should be
 >     coupled to the virtual machine (as a concept, not struct kvm), should
 >     the binding/coupling be with the file, or the inode?
 >

I've been working on Gunyah's implementation in parallel (not yet posted 
anywhere). Thus far, I've coupled the virtual machine struct to the 
struct file so that I can increment the file refcount when mapping the 
gmem to the virtual machine.

 > 2. Should struct kvm still be bound to the file/inode at gmem file
 >     creation time, since
 >
 >     + struct kvm isn't a good representation of a "virtual machine"
 >     + we currently don't have anything that really represents a "virtual
 >       machine" without hardware support
 >
 >
 > I'd also like to bring up another userspace use case that Google has:
 > re-use of gmem files for rebooting guests when the KVM instance is
 > destroyed and rebuilt.
 >
 > When rebooting a VM there are some steps relating to gmem that are
 > performance-sensitive:
 >
 > a.      Zeroing pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > b. Deallocating pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > c.   Allocating pages for the new VM from the new gmem file/inode
 > d.      Zeroing pages on page allocation
 >
 > We want to reuse the gmem file to save re-allocating pages (b. and c.),
 > and one of the two page zeroing allocations (a. or d.).
 >
 > Binding the gmem file to a struct kvm on creation time means the gmem
 > file can't be reused with another VM on reboot. Also, host userspace is
 > forced to close the gmem file to allow the old VM to be freed.
 >
 > For other places where files pin KVM, like the stats fd pinning vCPUs, I
 > guess that matters less since there isn't much of a penalty to close and
 > re-open the stats fd.

I had a 3rd question that's related to how to wire the gmem up to a 
virtual machine:

I learned of a usecase to implement copy-on-write for gmem. The premise 
would be to have a "golden copy" of the memory that multiple virtual 
machines can map in as RO. If a virtual machine tries to write to those 
pages, they get copied to a virtual machine-specific page that isn't 
shared with other VMs. How do we track those pages?

Thanks,
Elliot

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	<chenhuacai@kernel.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	<anup@brainfault.org>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	<palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	<willy@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<paul@paul-moore.com>, <jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	<tabba@google.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	<yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>, <vannapurve@google.com>,
	<mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	<david@redhat.com>, <qperret@google.com>, <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	<wei.w.wang@intel.com>, <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
	<isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 12/29] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:53:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <253965df-6d80-bbfd-ab01-f9e69b274bf3@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqzttsiu67n.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>



On 8/28/2023 3:56 PM, Ackerley Tng wrote:
 > 1. Since the physical memory's representation is the inode and should be
 >     coupled to the virtual machine (as a concept, not struct kvm), should
 >     the binding/coupling be with the file, or the inode?
 >

I've been working on Gunyah's implementation in parallel (not yet posted 
anywhere). Thus far, I've coupled the virtual machine struct to the 
struct file so that I can increment the file refcount when mapping the 
gmem to the virtual machine.

 > 2. Should struct kvm still be bound to the file/inode at gmem file
 >     creation time, since
 >
 >     + struct kvm isn't a good representation of a "virtual machine"
 >     + we currently don't have anything that really represents a "virtual
 >       machine" without hardware support
 >
 >
 > I'd also like to bring up another userspace use case that Google has:
 > re-use of gmem files for rebooting guests when the KVM instance is
 > destroyed and rebuilt.
 >
 > When rebooting a VM there are some steps relating to gmem that are
 > performance-sensitive:
 >
 > a.      Zeroing pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > b. Deallocating pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > c.   Allocating pages for the new VM from the new gmem file/inode
 > d.      Zeroing pages on page allocation
 >
 > We want to reuse the gmem file to save re-allocating pages (b. and c.),
 > and one of the two page zeroing allocations (a. or d.).
 >
 > Binding the gmem file to a struct kvm on creation time means the gmem
 > file can't be reused with another VM on reboot. Also, host userspace is
 > forced to close the gmem file to allow the old VM to be freed.
 >
 > For other places where files pin KVM, like the stats fd pinning vCPUs, I
 > guess that matters less since there isn't much of a penalty to close and
 > re-open the stats fd.

I had a 3rd question that's related to how to wire the gmem up to a 
virtual machine:

I learned of a usecase to implement copy-on-write for gmem. The premise 
would be to have a "golden copy" of the memory that multiple virtual 
machines can map in as RO. If a virtual machine tries to write to those 
pages, they get copied to a virtual machine-specific page that isn't 
shared with other VMs. How do we track those pages?

Thanks,
Elliot

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	<chenhuacai@kernel.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	<anup@brainfault.org>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	<palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	<willy@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<paul@paul-moore.com>, <jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	<tabba@google.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	<yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>, <vannapurve@google.com>,
	<mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	<david@redhat.com>, <qperret@google.com>, <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	<wei.w.wang@intel.com>, <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
	<isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 12/29] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:53:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <253965df-6d80-bbfd-ab01-f9e69b274bf3@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqzttsiu67n.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>



On 8/28/2023 3:56 PM, Ackerley Tng wrote:
 > 1. Since the physical memory's representation is the inode and should be
 >     coupled to the virtual machine (as a concept, not struct kvm), should
 >     the binding/coupling be with the file, or the inode?
 >

I've been working on Gunyah's implementation in parallel (not yet posted 
anywhere). Thus far, I've coupled the virtual machine struct to the 
struct file so that I can increment the file refcount when mapping the 
gmem to the virtual machine.

 > 2. Should struct kvm still be bound to the file/inode at gmem file
 >     creation time, since
 >
 >     + struct kvm isn't a good representation of a "virtual machine"
 >     + we currently don't have anything that really represents a "virtual
 >       machine" without hardware support
 >
 >
 > I'd also like to bring up another userspace use case that Google has:
 > re-use of gmem files for rebooting guests when the KVM instance is
 > destroyed and rebuilt.
 >
 > When rebooting a VM there are some steps relating to gmem that are
 > performance-sensitive:
 >
 > a.      Zeroing pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > b. Deallocating pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > c.   Allocating pages for the new VM from the new gmem file/inode
 > d.      Zeroing pages on page allocation
 >
 > We want to reuse the gmem file to save re-allocating pages (b. and c.),
 > and one of the two page zeroing allocations (a. or d.).
 >
 > Binding the gmem file to a struct kvm on creation time means the gmem
 > file can't be reused with another VM on reboot. Also, host userspace is
 > forced to close the gmem file to allow the old VM to be freed.
 >
 > For other places where files pin KVM, like the stats fd pinning vCPUs, I
 > guess that matters less since there isn't much of a penalty to close and
 > re-open the stats fd.

I had a 3rd question that's related to how to wire the gmem up to a 
virtual machine:

I learned of a usecase to implement copy-on-write for gmem. The premise 
would be to have a "golden copy" of the memory that multiple virtual 
machines can map in as RO. If a virtual machine tries to write to those 
pages, they get copied to a virtual machine-specific page that isn't 
shared with other VMs. How do we track those pages?

Thanks,
Elliot

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
	yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
	paul@paul-moore.com, maz@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	jmorris@namei.org, willy@infradead.org, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	tabba@google.com, jarkko@kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	vbabka@suse.cz, michael.roth@amd.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	qperret@google.com, liam.merwick@oracle.com,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, anup@brainfault.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, vannapurve@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 12/29] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:53:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <253965df-6d80-bbfd-ab01-f9e69b274bf3@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqzttsiu67n.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>



On 8/28/2023 3:56 PM, Ackerley Tng wrote:
 > 1. Since the physical memory's representation is the inode and should be
 >     coupled to the virtual machine (as a concept, not struct kvm), should
 >     the binding/coupling be with the file, or the inode?
 >

I've been working on Gunyah's implementation in parallel (not yet posted 
anywhere). Thus far, I've coupled the virtual machine struct to the 
struct file so that I can increment the file refcount when mapping the 
gmem to the virtual machine.

 > 2. Should struct kvm still be bound to the file/inode at gmem file
 >     creation time, since
 >
 >     + struct kvm isn't a good representation of a "virtual machine"
 >     + we currently don't have anything that really represents a "virtual
 >       machine" without hardware support
 >
 >
 > I'd also like to bring up another userspace use case that Google has:
 > re-use of gmem files for rebooting guests when the KVM instance is
 > destroyed and rebuilt.
 >
 > When rebooting a VM there are some steps relating to gmem that are
 > performance-sensitive:
 >
 > a.      Zeroing pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > b. Deallocating pages from the old VM when we close a gmem file/inode
 > c.   Allocating pages for the new VM from the new gmem file/inode
 > d.      Zeroing pages on page allocation
 >
 > We want to reuse the gmem file to save re-allocating pages (b. and c.),
 > and one of the two page zeroing allocations (a. or d.).
 >
 > Binding the gmem file to a struct kvm on creation time means the gmem
 > file can't be reused with another VM on reboot. Also, host userspace is
 > forced to close the gmem file to allow the old VM to be freed.
 >
 > For other places where files pin KVM, like the stats fd pinning vCPUs, I
 > guess that matters less since there isn't much of a penalty to close and
 > re-open the stats fd.

I had a 3rd question that's related to how to wire the gmem up to a 
virtual machine:

I learned of a usecase to implement copy-on-write for gmem. The premise 
would be to have a "golden copy" of the memory that multiple virtual 
machines can map in as RO. If a virtual machine tries to write to those 
pages, they get copied to a virtual machine-specific page that isn't 
shared with other VMs. How do we track those pages?

Thanks,
Elliot

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-29  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 517+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 23:44 [RFC PATCH v11 00/29] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 01/29] KVM: Wrap kvm_gfn_range.pte in a per-action union Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 13:39   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-19 13:39     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-19 13:39     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-19 13:39     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-19 15:39     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 15:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 15:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 15:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 16:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 16:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 16:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 16:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-26 20:22     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 20:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 20:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21  6:26   ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-21  6:26     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-21  6:26     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-21  6:26     ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-21 10:45     ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-21 10:45       ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-21 10:45       ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-21 10:45       ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-25 18:05       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 18:05         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 18:05         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 02/29] KVM: Tweak kvm_hva_range and hva_handler_t to allow reusing for gfn ranges Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 03/29] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 04/29] KVM: PPC: Drop dead code related to KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:34   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-19 17:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 05/29] KVM: Convert KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19  7:31   ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19  7:31     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19  7:31     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19  7:31     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19 14:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:15       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20  1:15       ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20  1:15         ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20  1:15         ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20  1:15         ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 06/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21  9:03   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21  9:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21  9:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21  9:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-28  9:25   ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-28  9:25     ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-28  9:25     ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-28  9:25     ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-29  0:03     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  0:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  0:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  0:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31  9:30       ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-31  9:30         ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-31  9:30         ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-31  9:30         ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-31 15:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-31 15:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-31 15:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-31 15:58         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 07/29] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19  7:54   ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19  7:54     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19  7:54     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19  7:54     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19 14:16     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 08/29] KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20  8:09   ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20  8:09     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20  8:09     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20  8:09     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20 19:02     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 19:02       ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 19:02       ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 19:02       ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 20:20       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 20:20         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 20:20         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 20:20         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 10:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 10:57     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 10:57     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 10:57     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:56   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:56     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:56     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:56     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-24  4:43   ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-24  4:43     ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-24  4:43     ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-26 15:59     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 15:59       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 15:59       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27  3:24       ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-27  3:24         ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-27  3:24         ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-27  3:24         ` Xu Yilun
2023-08-02 20:31   ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-08-02 20:31     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-08-02 20:31     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-08-02 20:31     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-08-14  0:44   ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-14  0:44     ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-14  0:44     ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-14  0:44     ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-14 21:54     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 21:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 21:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 21:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 09/29] KVM: x86: Disallow hugepages when memory attributes are mixed Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 11:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 11:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 11:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 11:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:41       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 10/29] mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as completely unmovable Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 10:24   ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-25 10:24     ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-25 10:24     ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-25 12:51     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-25 12:51       ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-25 12:51       ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-26 11:36       ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-26 11:36         ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-26 11:36         ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-28 16:02       ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-28 16:02         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-28 16:02         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-28 16:02         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-28 16:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-28 16:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-28 16:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-28 16:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-01  8:23       ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-01  8:23         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-01  8:23         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-01  8:23         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 11/29] security: Export security_inode_init_security_anon() for use by KVM Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19  2:14   ` Paul Moore
2023-07-19  2:14     ` Paul Moore
2023-07-19  2:14     ` Paul Moore
2023-07-19  2:14     ` Paul Moore
2023-07-31 10:46   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-31 10:46     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-31 10:46     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-31 10:46     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 12/29] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:21   ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-07-19 17:21     ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-07-19 17:21     ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-07-19 17:21     ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-07-19 17:47     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:47       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:47       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:47       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 14:45   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-20 14:45     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-20 14:45     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-20 14:45     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-20 15:14     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 15:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 15:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 15:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 21:28   ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 21:28     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 21:28     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 21:28     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21  6:13   ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-21  6:13     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-21  6:13     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-21  6:13     ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-21 22:27     ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 22:27       ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 22:27       ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 22:27       ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 22:33       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 22:33         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 22:33         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 22:33         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:05   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:05     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:05     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:05     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:42     ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:42       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:42       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:42       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 17:42       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:50       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:50       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:50       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 15:09   ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-25 15:09     ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-25 15:09     ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-25 16:03     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 16:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 16:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26  1:51       ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-26  1:51         ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-26  1:51         ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-31 16:23       ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-31 16:23         ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-31 16:23         ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-31 16:23         ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-26 17:18   ` Elliot Berman
2023-07-26 17:18     ` Elliot Berman
2023-07-26 17:18     ` Elliot Berman
2023-07-26 19:28     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 19:28       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 19:28       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 10:39   ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-27 10:39     ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-27 10:39     ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-27 10:39     ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-27 17:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 13:46       ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-31 13:46         ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-31 13:46         ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-31 13:46         ` Fuad Tabba
2023-08-03 19:15   ` Ryan Afranji
2023-08-03 19:15     ` Ryan Afranji
2023-08-03 19:15     ` Ryan Afranji
2023-08-03 19:15     ` Ryan Afranji
2023-08-07 23:06   ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:06     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:06     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:06     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-08 21:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-08 21:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-08 21:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-08 21:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-10 23:57       ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-08-10 23:57         ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-08-10 23:57         ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-08-10 23:57         ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-08-11 17:44         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-11 17:44           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-11 17:44           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-11 17:44           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 18:43       ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-15 18:43         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-15 18:43         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-15 18:43         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-15 20:03         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 20:03           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 20:03           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 20:03           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 17:30           ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 17:30             ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 17:30             ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 17:30             ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 19:33             ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 19:33               ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 19:33               ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 19:33               ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-28 22:56               ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-28 22:56                 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-28 22:56                 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-28 22:56                 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-29  2:53                 ` Elliot Berman [this message]
2023-08-29  2:53                   ` Elliot Berman
2023-08-29  2:53                   ` Elliot Berman
2023-08-29  2:53                   ` Elliot Berman
2023-09-14 19:12                   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 19:12                     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 19:12                     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 19:12                     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 18:15                 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 18:15                   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 18:15                   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 18:15                   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 23:19                   ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-14 23:19                     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-14 23:19                     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-14 23:19                     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-15  0:33                     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  0:33                       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  0:33                       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  0:33                       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-30 15:12   ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-30 15:12     ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-30 15:12     ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-30 15:12     ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-30 16:44     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-30 16:44       ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-30 16:44       ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-30 16:44       ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-01  3:45       ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-01  3:45         ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-01  3:45         ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-01  3:45         ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-01 16:46         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-01 16:46           ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-01 16:46           ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-01 16:46           ` Ackerley Tng
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 13/29] KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for dedicated guest memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-06 22:10       ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-06 22:10         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-06 22:10         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-06 22:10         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 14/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:09     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 15/29] KVM: Drop superfluous __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE macro Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 16/29] KVM: Allow arch code to track number of memslot address spaces per VM Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 17/29] KVM: x86: Add support for "protected VMs" that can utilize private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 18/29] KVM: selftests: Drop unused kvm_userspace_memory_region_find() helper Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 19/29] KVM: selftests: Convert lib's mem regions to KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 20/29] KVM: selftests: Add support for creating private memslots Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 21/29] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to convert guest memory b/w private and shared Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to do KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE hypercalls (x86) Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 23/29] KVM: selftests: Introduce VM "shape" to allow tests to specify the VM type Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 24/29] KVM: selftests: Add GUEST_SYNC[1-6] macros for synchronizing more data Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 25/29] KVM: selftests: Add x86-only selftest for private memory conversions Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 26/29] KVM: selftests: Add KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 helper Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 27/29] KVM: selftests: Expand set_memory_region_test to validate guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-07 23:17   ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:17     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:17     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:17     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 28/29] KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-07 23:20   ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:20     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:20     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:20     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-18 23:03     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 23:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 23:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 23:03       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-07 23:25   ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:25     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:25     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-07 23:25     ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-18 23:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 23:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 23:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-18 23:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 19:49       ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 19:49         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 19:49         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 19:49         ` Ackerley Tng
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 29/29] KVM: selftests: Test KVM exit behavior for private memory/access Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-24  6:38 ` [RFC PATCH v11 00/29] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-24  6:38   ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-24  6:38   ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-24 17:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-24 17:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-24 17:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 11:20     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-26 11:20       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-26 11:20       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-26 14:24       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 14:24         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 14:24         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27  6:42         ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-27  6:42           ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-27  6:42           ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-27  6:42           ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-08-03 11:03       ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-03 11:03         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-03 11:03         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-03 11:03         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-24 20:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 17:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-29  9:12   ` Chao Peng
2023-08-31 18:29     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-01  1:17       ` Chao Peng
2023-09-01  8:26         ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-01  9:10         ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-08-30  0:00   ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-09-09  0:16   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=253965df-6d80-bbfd-ab01-f9e69b274bf3@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.