All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name"
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:00:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26184.1537790420@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924094723.487697-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>

Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> wrote:

> This changes UAPI, breaking iwd and libell:
> 
>   ell/key.c: In function 'kernel_dh_compute':
>   ell/key.c:205:38: error: 'struct keyctl_dh_params' has no member named 'private'; did you mean 'dh_private'?
>     struct keyctl_dh_params params = { .private = private,
>                                         ^~~~~~~
>                                         dh_private
> 
> This reverts commit 8a2336e549d385bb0b46880435b411df8d8200e8.
> 
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> Cc: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Can I stick your Signed-off-by on it?

David

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name"
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26184.1537790420@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924094723.487697-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>

Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> wrote:

> This changes UAPI, breaking iwd and libell:
> 
>   ell/key.c: In function 'kernel_dh_compute':
>   ell/key.c:205:38: error: 'struct keyctl_dh_params' has no member named 'private'; did you mean 'dh_private'?
>     struct keyctl_dh_params params = { .private = private,
>                                         ^~~~~~~
>                                         dh_private
> 
> This reverts commit 8a2336e549d385bb0b46880435b411df8d8200e8.
> 
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> Cc: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Can I stick your Signed-off-by on it?

David

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dhowells@redhat.com (David Howells)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name"
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26184.1537790420@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924094723.487697-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>

Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> wrote:

> This changes UAPI, breaking iwd and libell:
> 
>   ell/key.c: In function 'kernel_dh_compute':
>   ell/key.c:205:38: error: 'struct keyctl_dh_params' has no member named 'private'; did you mean 'dh_private'?
>     struct keyctl_dh_params params = { .private = private,
>                                         ^~~~~~~
>                                         dh_private
> 
> This reverts commit 8a2336e549d385bb0b46880435b411df8d8200e8.
> 
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> Cc: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Can I stick your Signed-off-by on it?

David

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-24  9:47 [PATCH] Revert "uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name" Lubomir Rintel
2018-09-24  9:47 ` Lubomir Rintel
2018-09-24  9:47 ` Lubomir Rintel
2018-09-24 12:00 ` David Howells [this message]
2018-09-24 12:00   ` David Howells
2018-09-24 12:00   ` David Howells
2018-09-24 12:08   ` Lubomir Rintel
2018-09-24 12:08     ` Lubomir Rintel
2018-09-24 12:08     ` Lubomir Rintel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26184.1537790420@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.