From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: oren@nvidia.com, nitzanc@nvidia.com, cohuck@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] virito_pci: add timeout to reset device operation Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 21:18:26 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <2b4edcaf-779d-b197-0437-c6cb8e82e8e1@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <7ed9cafa-498e-156d-c667-6da3fa432b18@nvidia.com> 在 2021/4/8 下午8:57, Max Gurtovoy 写道: > > On 4/8/2021 3:45 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> 在 2021/4/8 下午5:44, Max Gurtovoy 写道: >>> >>> On 4/8/2021 12:01 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> 在 2021/4/8 下午4:11, Max Gurtovoy 写道: >>>>> According to the spec after writing 0 to device_status, the driver >>>>> MUST >>>>> wait for a read of device_status to return 0 before reinitializing >>>>> the >>>>> device. In case we have a device that won't return 0, the reset >>>>> operation will loop forever and cause the host/vm to stuck. Set >>>>> timeout >>>>> for 3 minutes before giving up on the device. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 10 +++++++++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> index cc3412a96a17..dcee616e8d21 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static int vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>>>> { >>>>> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); >>>>> struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev = &vp_dev->mdev; >>>>> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(180000); >>>>> /* 0 status means a reset. */ >>>>> vp_modern_set_status(mdev, 0); >>>>> @@ -169,9 +170,16 @@ static int vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>>>> * device_status to return 0 before reinitializing the device. >>>>> * This will flush out the status write, and flush in device >>>>> writes, >>>>> * including MSI-X interrupts, if any. >>>>> + * Set a timeout before giving up on the device. >>>>> */ >>>>> - while (vp_modern_get_status(mdev)) >>>>> + while (vp_modern_get_status(mdev)) { >>>>> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) { >>>> >>>> >>>> What happens if the device finish the rest after the timeout? >>> >>> >>> The driver will set VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED and one can re-probe it >>> later on (e.g by re-scanning the pci bus). >> >> >> Ok, so do we need the flush through vp_synchronize_vectors() here? > > If the device didn't write 0 to status I guess we don't need that. > > The device shouldn't raise any interrupt before negotiation finish > successfully. The reset could be triggered in other places like driver removing. Thanks > > MST, is that correct ? > >> >> Thanks >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>>> + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "virtio: device not ready. " >>>>> + "Aborting. Try again later\n"); >>>>> + return -EAGAIN; >>>>> + } >>>>> msleep(1); >>>>> + } >>>>> /* Flush pending VQ/configuration callbacks. */ >>>>> vp_synchronize_vectors(vdev); >>>>> return 0; >>>> >>> >> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: nitzanc@nvidia.com, oren@nvidia.com, cohuck@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] virito_pci: add timeout to reset device operation Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 21:18:26 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <2b4edcaf-779d-b197-0437-c6cb8e82e8e1@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <7ed9cafa-498e-156d-c667-6da3fa432b18@nvidia.com> 在 2021/4/8 下午8:57, Max Gurtovoy 写道: > > On 4/8/2021 3:45 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> 在 2021/4/8 下午5:44, Max Gurtovoy 写道: >>> >>> On 4/8/2021 12:01 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> 在 2021/4/8 下午4:11, Max Gurtovoy 写道: >>>>> According to the spec after writing 0 to device_status, the driver >>>>> MUST >>>>> wait for a read of device_status to return 0 before reinitializing >>>>> the >>>>> device. In case we have a device that won't return 0, the reset >>>>> operation will loop forever and cause the host/vm to stuck. Set >>>>> timeout >>>>> for 3 minutes before giving up on the device. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 10 +++++++++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> index cc3412a96a17..dcee616e8d21 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c >>>>> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static int vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>>>> { >>>>> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); >>>>> struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev = &vp_dev->mdev; >>>>> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(180000); >>>>> /* 0 status means a reset. */ >>>>> vp_modern_set_status(mdev, 0); >>>>> @@ -169,9 +170,16 @@ static int vp_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>>>> * device_status to return 0 before reinitializing the device. >>>>> * This will flush out the status write, and flush in device >>>>> writes, >>>>> * including MSI-X interrupts, if any. >>>>> + * Set a timeout before giving up on the device. >>>>> */ >>>>> - while (vp_modern_get_status(mdev)) >>>>> + while (vp_modern_get_status(mdev)) { >>>>> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) { >>>> >>>> >>>> What happens if the device finish the rest after the timeout? >>> >>> >>> The driver will set VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED and one can re-probe it >>> later on (e.g by re-scanning the pci bus). >> >> >> Ok, so do we need the flush through vp_synchronize_vectors() here? > > If the device didn't write 0 to status I guess we don't need that. > > The device shouldn't raise any interrupt before negotiation finish > successfully. The reset could be triggered in other places like driver removing. Thanks > > MST, is that correct ? > >> >> Thanks >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>>> + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "virtio: device not ready. " >>>>> + "Aborting. Try again later\n"); >>>>> + return -EAGAIN; >>>>> + } >>>>> msleep(1); >>>>> + } >>>>> /* Flush pending VQ/configuration callbacks. */ >>>>> vp_synchronize_vectors(vdev); >>>>> return 0; >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 13:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-08 8:11 [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio: update reset callback to return status Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] virito_pci: add timeout to reset device operation Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 9:01 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 9:01 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 9:44 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 12:45 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 12:45 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 12:57 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 13:18 ` Jason Wang [this message] 2021-04-08 13:18 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] virtio_pci: add module param for reset_timeout Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio: update reset callback to return status Jason Wang 2021-04-08 8:58 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 9:56 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 13:14 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 13:14 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-08 14:24 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-09 5:22 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-09 5:22 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-11 9:50 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-12 9:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 9:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 12:17 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-12 21:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 21:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-08 15:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-08 15:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 11:55 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-12 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 13:03 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-12 21:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 21:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-12 22:53 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-13 2:42 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-13 2:42 ` Jason Wang 2021-04-13 4:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-13 4:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-13 4:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-13 4:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-13 10:56 ` Max Gurtovoy 2021-04-08 16:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-04-08 16:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=2b4edcaf-779d-b197-0437-c6cb8e82e8e1@redhat.com \ --to=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=nitzanc@nvidia.com \ --cc=oren@nvidia.com \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.