All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:07:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3813a2f5-c74a-4760-34ce-1c88f187c91c@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5556a755-01a1-3620-8693-0fc69c6f627d@suse.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3566 bytes --]

Hi

Am 05.04.23 um 09:49 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
> 
> Am 04.04.23 um 22:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> This one nukes all framebuffers, which is a bit much. In reality
>> gma500 is igpu and never shipped with anything discrete, so there should
>> not be any difference.
>>
>> v2: Unfortunately the framebuffer sits outside of the pci bars for
>> gma500, and so only using the pci helpers won't be enough. Otoh if we
>> only use non-pci helper, then we don't get the vga handling, and
>> subsequent refactoring to untangle these special cases won't work.
>>
>> It's not pretty, but the simplest fix (since gma500 really is the only
>> quirky pci driver like this we have) is to just have both calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c | 9 +++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
>> index 2ce96b1b9c74..f1e0eed8fea4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
>> @@ -422,12 +422,17 @@ static int psb_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>       /*
>>        * We cannot yet easily find the framebuffer's location in 
>> memory. So
>> -     * remove all framebuffers here.
>> +     * remove all framebuffers here. Note that we still want the pci 
>> special
>> +     * handling to kick out vgacon.
>>        *
>>        * TODO: Refactor psb_driver_load() to map vdc_reg earlier. Then we
>>        *       might be able to read the framebuffer range from the 
>> device.
>>        */
>> -    ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(true, &driver);
>> +    ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(false, &driver);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(pdev, 
>> &driver);
> 
> This simply isn't it. If you have to work around your own API, it's time 
> to rethink the API.

Here's a proposal:

  1) As you're changing aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() anyway, 
rename it to aperture_remove_conflicting_devices_at(), so it's clear 
that it takes a memory range.

  2) Introduce aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices_at(), which takes 
a PCI device and a memory range. It should do the is_primary and vgacon 
stuff, but kick out the range.

  3) Call aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices_at() from gma500 with 
the full range. Even if we can restructure gma500 to detect the firmware 
framebuffer from its registers (there's this TODO item), we'd still need 
aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices_at() to do something useful with it.

  4) With that, aperture_remove_conflicting_devices_at() can drop the 
primary argument.

Of course, the DRM-related interface should be adapted as well. There's 
a bit of overlap in the implementation of both PCI aperture helpers, but 
the overall interface is clear.

Best regards
Thomas

> 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 
>>       if (ret)
>>           return ret;
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:07:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3813a2f5-c74a-4760-34ce-1c88f187c91c@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5556a755-01a1-3620-8693-0fc69c6f627d@suse.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3566 bytes --]

Hi

Am 05.04.23 um 09:49 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
> 
> Am 04.04.23 um 22:18 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> This one nukes all framebuffers, which is a bit much. In reality
>> gma500 is igpu and never shipped with anything discrete, so there should
>> not be any difference.
>>
>> v2: Unfortunately the framebuffer sits outside of the pci bars for
>> gma500, and so only using the pci helpers won't be enough. Otoh if we
>> only use non-pci helper, then we don't get the vga handling, and
>> subsequent refactoring to untangle these special cases won't work.
>>
>> It's not pretty, but the simplest fix (since gma500 really is the only
>> quirky pci driver like this we have) is to just have both calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c | 9 +++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
>> index 2ce96b1b9c74..f1e0eed8fea4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
>> @@ -422,12 +422,17 @@ static int psb_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
>> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>       /*
>>        * We cannot yet easily find the framebuffer's location in 
>> memory. So
>> -     * remove all framebuffers here.
>> +     * remove all framebuffers here. Note that we still want the pci 
>> special
>> +     * handling to kick out vgacon.
>>        *
>>        * TODO: Refactor psb_driver_load() to map vdc_reg earlier. Then we
>>        *       might be able to read the framebuffer range from the 
>> device.
>>        */
>> -    ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(true, &driver);
>> +    ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(false, &driver);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(pdev, 
>> &driver);
> 
> This simply isn't it. If you have to work around your own API, it's time 
> to rethink the API.

Here's a proposal:

  1) As you're changing aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() anyway, 
rename it to aperture_remove_conflicting_devices_at(), so it's clear 
that it takes a memory range.

  2) Introduce aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices_at(), which takes 
a PCI device and a memory range. It should do the is_primary and vgacon 
stuff, but kick out the range.

  3) Call aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices_at() from gma500 with 
the full range. Even if we can restructure gma500 to detect the firmware 
framebuffer from its registers (there's this TODO item), we'd still need 
aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices_at() to do something useful with it.

  4) With that, aperture_remove_conflicting_devices_at() can drop the 
primary argument.

Of course, the DRM-related interface should be adapted as well. There's 
a bit of overlap in the implementation of both PCI aperture helpers, but 
the overall interface is clear.

Best regards
Thomas

> 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 
>>       if (ret)
>>           return ret;
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-05  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-04 20:18 [PATCH 1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] video/aperture: use generic code to figure out the vga default device Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:27   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:27     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:27     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/aperture: Remove primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 21:20   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-04 21:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-04 21:20     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-04 21:20     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-04 21:20     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-05  9:25   ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-05  9:25     ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-05  9:25     ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-05  9:25     ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-05  9:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Thierry Reding
2023-04-05 11:30   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] video/aperture: Only kick vgacon when the pdev is decoding vga Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:31   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:31     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] video/aperture: Move vga handling to pci function Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:34     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] video/aperture: Drop primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:36   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:36     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:36     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:59   ` Aaron Plattner
2023-04-04 20:59     ` Aaron Plattner
2023-04-04 20:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Aaron Plattner
2023-04-05  8:48     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05  8:48       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05  8:48       ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:37   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:37     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] fbdev: Simplify fb_is_primary_device for x86 Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:40   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Patchwork
2023-04-04 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-04 23:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-05  7:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  7:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  8:05   ` Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-05  8:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-05  8:15     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  8:15       ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  8:07   ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2023-04-05  8:07     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  8:59     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05  8:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05  9:26       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  9:26         ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  9:38         ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05  9:38           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:00           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 11:00             ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 11:16             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 11:16               ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 13:18               ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 13:18                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 14:32                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 14:32                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 16:02                   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 16:02                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 16:54                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 16:54                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 17:14                       ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 17:14                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 17:43                         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 17:43                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 17:46                         ` Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-06  7:31                           ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 11:16                             ` Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-05  8:19 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  8:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05  9:09   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05  9:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 10:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/8] " Patchwork
2023-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-06  7:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-06  8:38   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-06  8:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-06  8:49     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-06  8:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-06  9:05       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-06  9:05         ` [Intel-gfx] " Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-06  9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3813a2f5-c74a-4760-34ce-1c88f187c91c@suse.de \
    --to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.