From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bastian Stender <bst@pengutronix.de>, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] video: ssd1307fb: Improve a size determination in ssd1307fb_probe()
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:53:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3926941.Nf8LXND9kI@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2fc8e5c-e4d3-51da-451c-be70e0d3fef0@users.sourceforge.net>
On Sunday, January 07, 2018 07:34:44 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:27:28 +0100
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Patch queued for 4.17, thanks.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bastian Stender <bst@pengutronix.de>, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] video: ssd1307fb: Improve a size determination in ssd1307fb_probe()
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:53:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3926941.Nf8LXND9kI@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2fc8e5c-e4d3-51da-451c-be70e0d3fef0@users.sourceforge.net>
On Sunday, January 07, 2018 07:34:44 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:27:28 +0100
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Patch queued for 4.17, thanks.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20171125160425epcas5p43b2d94fbcc74745017c4c91ff08de685@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2017-11-25 16:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] video: ssd1307fb: Adjustments for ssd1307fb_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] video: ssd1307fb: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in ssd1307fb_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:05 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] video: ssd1307fb: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in ssd1307fb_pr SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] video: ssd1307fb: Improve a size determination in ssd1307fb_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:06 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-25 16:06 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-12-29 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] video: ssd1307fb: Adjustments for ssd1307fb_probe() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-12-29 18:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-12-29 18:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-12-29 18:23 ` [0/2] " SF Markus Elfring
2017-12-29 18:23 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-07 18:34 ` [PATCH v2] video: ssd1307fb: Improve a size determination in ssd1307fb_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-07 18:34 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-07 18:34 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-03-28 13:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2018-03-28 13:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3926941.Nf8LXND9kI@amdc3058 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bst@pengutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.