Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DSIPHY RPM

From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DSIPHY RPM
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:31:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b4865d7-2730-1ea9-d75b-a015d27aa84d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168908465045.1869384.1893558597710112842.b4-ty@linaro.org>

On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>>
>> Tested on SM6375.
>>
>>
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
>        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
>        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d

Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove 
these patches for now.

I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of 
having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take 
a look?

[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271774
[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271775

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry