All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	"Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI injection
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:45:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e3bf6bc-d1ab-ec77-e94c-d5defd133c5b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485d9990-a6ad-2be0-e829-a0290d7d6a6f@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

On 23/07/2019 16:10, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 6/11/19 7:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When performing an MSI injection, let's first check if the translation
>> is already in the cache. If so, let's inject it quickly without
>> going through the whole translation process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index 62932458476a..83d80ec33473 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -577,6 +577,20 @@ static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct vgic_dist *dist,
>>  	return irq;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
>> +					     u32 devid, u32 eventid)
>> +{
>> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> +	struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
>> +	irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid);
>> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return irq;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>>  				       u32 devid, u32 eventid,
>>  				       struct vgic_irq *irq)
>> @@ -736,6 +750,25 @@ static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int vgic_its_inject_cached_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
>> +{
>> +	struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	phys_addr_t db;
>> +
>> +	db = (u64)msi->address_hi << 32 | msi->address_lo;
>> +	irq = vgic_its_check_cache(kvm, db, msi->devid, msi->data);
> 
> I think we miss a check of its->enabled. This is currently done in
> vgic_its_resolve_lpi() but now likely to be bypassed.

But why would a translation be cached if the ITS is disabled? It should
never haver been there the first place (vgic_its_resolve_lpi does check
for the ITS being enabled, as you pointed out).

Which makes me think that we miss an invalidate on an ITS being disabled:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 2633b0e88981..5f2ad74ad834 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1719,6 +1719,8 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_ctlr(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 		goto out;
 
 	its->enabled = !!(val & GITS_CTLR_ENABLE);
+	if (!its->enabled)
+		vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm);
 
 	/*
 	 * Try to process any pending commands. This function bails out early


What do you think?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI injection
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:45:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e3bf6bc-d1ab-ec77-e94c-d5defd133c5b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485d9990-a6ad-2be0-e829-a0290d7d6a6f@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

On 23/07/2019 16:10, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 6/11/19 7:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When performing an MSI injection, let's first check if the translation
>> is already in the cache. If so, let's inject it quickly without
>> going through the whole translation process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index 62932458476a..83d80ec33473 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -577,6 +577,20 @@ static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct vgic_dist *dist,
>>  	return irq;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
>> +					     u32 devid, u32 eventid)
>> +{
>> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> +	struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
>> +	irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid);
>> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return irq;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>>  				       u32 devid, u32 eventid,
>>  				       struct vgic_irq *irq)
>> @@ -736,6 +750,25 @@ static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int vgic_its_inject_cached_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
>> +{
>> +	struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	phys_addr_t db;
>> +
>> +	db = (u64)msi->address_hi << 32 | msi->address_lo;
>> +	irq = vgic_its_check_cache(kvm, db, msi->devid, msi->data);
> 
> I think we miss a check of its->enabled. This is currently done in
> vgic_its_resolve_lpi() but now likely to be bypassed.

But why would a translation be cached if the ITS is disabled? It should
never haver been there the first place (vgic_its_resolve_lpi does check
for the ITS being enabled, as you pointed out).

Which makes me think that we miss an invalidate on an ITS being disabled:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 2633b0e88981..5f2ad74ad834 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1719,6 +1719,8 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_ctlr(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 		goto out;
 
 	its->enabled = !!(val & GITS_CTLR_ENABLE);
+	if (!its->enabled)
+		vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm);
 
 	/*
 	 * Try to process any pending commands. This function bails out early


What do you think?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI injection
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:45:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e3bf6bc-d1ab-ec77-e94c-d5defd133c5b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485d9990-a6ad-2be0-e829-a0290d7d6a6f@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

On 23/07/2019 16:10, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 6/11/19 7:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When performing an MSI injection, let's first check if the translation
>> is already in the cache. If so, let's inject it quickly without
>> going through the whole translation process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index 62932458476a..83d80ec33473 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -577,6 +577,20 @@ static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct vgic_dist *dist,
>>  	return irq;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
>> +					     u32 devid, u32 eventid)
>> +{
>> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> +	struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
>> +	irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid);
>> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return irq;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>>  				       u32 devid, u32 eventid,
>>  				       struct vgic_irq *irq)
>> @@ -736,6 +750,25 @@ static int vgic_its_trigger_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int vgic_its_inject_cached_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
>> +{
>> +	struct vgic_irq *irq;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	phys_addr_t db;
>> +
>> +	db = (u64)msi->address_hi << 32 | msi->address_lo;
>> +	irq = vgic_its_check_cache(kvm, db, msi->devid, msi->data);
> 
> I think we miss a check of its->enabled. This is currently done in
> vgic_its_resolve_lpi() but now likely to be bypassed.

But why would a translation be cached if the ITS is disabled? It should
never haver been there the first place (vgic_its_resolve_lpi does check
for the ITS being enabled, as you pointed out).

Which makes me think that we miss an invalidate on an ITS being disabled:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 2633b0e88981..5f2ad74ad834 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1719,6 +1719,8 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_ctlr(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 		goto out;
 
 	its->enabled = !!(val & GITS_CTLR_ENABLE);
+	if (!its->enabled)
+		vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm);
 
 	/*
 	 * Try to process any pending commands. This function bails out early


What do you think?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-11 17:03 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: ITS translation cache Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add LPI translation cache definition Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-12  8:16   ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12  8:16     ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12  8:16     ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12  8:49     ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12  8:49       ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12  8:49       ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12  9:52     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-12  9:52       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-12 10:58       ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 10:58         ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 10:58         ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 12:28         ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 12:28           ` Julien Thierry
2019-06-12 12:28           ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-23 12:43   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:43     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:43     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add __vgic_put_lpi_locked primitive Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Add MSI-LPI translation cache invalidation Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:39   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:39     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:39     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on specific commands Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-01 12:38   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-01 12:38     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-01 12:38     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-22 10:54     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-22 10:54       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-22 10:54       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:25       ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:25         ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:25         ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:43         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:43           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:43           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:47           ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:47             ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:47             ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 12:50             ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:50               ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 12:50               ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on disabling LPIs Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:09   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:09     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:09     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on vgic teardown Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:10   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:10     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:10     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Cache successful MSI->LPI translation Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-25 11:50   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-25 11:50     ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-25 11:50     ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-25 12:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-25 12:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-25 12:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-25 16:00       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-25 16:00         ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-25 16:00         ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-26  3:54         ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-26  3:54           ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-26  3:54           ` Zenghui Yu
2019-06-26  7:55         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-26  7:55           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:21   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:21     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:21     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI injection Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:10   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:10     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:10     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:45     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-07-23 15:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-24  7:41       ` Auger Eric
2019-07-24  7:41         ` Auger Eric
2019-07-24  7:41         ` Auger Eric
2019-06-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-irqfd: Implement kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-06-11 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 15:14   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:14     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-23 15:14     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-25  8:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25  8:24       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25  8:24       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-23 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: ITS translation cache Andre Przywara
2019-07-23 11:14   ` Andre Przywara
2019-07-23 11:14   ` Andre Przywara
2019-07-25  8:50   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25  8:50     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25  8:50     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25 10:01     ` Andre Przywara
2019-07-25 10:01       ` Andre Przywara
2019-07-25 10:01       ` Andre Przywara
2019-07-25 15:37       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25 15:37         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-25 15:37         ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e3bf6bc-d1ab-ec77-e94c-d5defd133c5b@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.