All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add support for generic power-domains
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e7a7b77-9104-4141-b8a9-3caca05416dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZV1E1aigUFcLceWK@radian>

Hi,

On 11/22/23 01:01, Richard Acayan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:01:18AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/21/23 02:17, Richard Acayan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 06:20:17PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> The simple-framebuffer device tree bindings document the power-domains
>>>> property, so make sure that simplefb supports it. This ensures that the
>>>> power domains remain enabled as long as simplefb is active.
>>>>
>>>> v2: - remove unnecessary call to simplefb_detach_genpds() since that's
>>>>       already done automatically by devres
>>>>     - fix crash if power-domains property is missing in DT
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> index 18025f34fde7..fe682af63827 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>>>  #include <linux/of_clk.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/parser.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>>>  
>>>>  static const struct fb_fix_screeninfo simplefb_fix = {
>>>> @@ -78,6 +79,11 @@ struct simplefb_par {
>>>>  	unsigned int clk_count;
>>>>  	struct clk **clks;
>>>>  #endif
>>>> +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>>>> +	unsigned int num_genpds;
>>>
>>> This is the cause of the crash that occurred on the older patch series.
>>> The field is unsigned, a deviation from v6.6:drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c.
>>>
>>> Instead of making it signed, this version emits an error whenever the
>>> count is negative.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you are trying to say here ?
> 
> In v1 of the patch, there was no error propagation from of_count_phandle_with_args
> and this field was directly assigned to the return value. This was a
> problem (the "crash" as mentioned in this patch's changelog) when the
> return value is negative, since unsigned integers cannot hold negative
> values. On mainstream architectures, the driver would believe that there
> is an absurd amount of power domains.
> 
> I compared the versions of this patch and figured that the fix to the
> crash was more error handling.
> 
> Basically, if "unsigned" was removed, the error handling for the call to
> of_count_phandle_with_args could be dropped with few consequences.

I see, thank you for explaining.

I believe that actually handling the error is better then storing
a negative value, so I believe that the fix in v2 is correct.

>>>> +	struct device **genpds;
>>>> +	struct device_link **genpd_links;
>>>> +#endif
>>>>  #if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_REGULATOR
>>>>  	bool regulators_enabled;
>>>>  	u32 regulator_count;
>>>> @@ -432,6 +438,89 @@ static void simplefb_regulators_enable(struct simplefb_par *par,
>>>>  static void simplefb_regulators_destroy(struct simplefb_par *par) { }
>>>>  #endif
>>>>  
>>>> +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>>>> +static void simplefb_detach_genpds(void *res)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct simplefb_par *par = res;
>>>> +	unsigned int i = par->num_genpds;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (par->num_genpds <= 1)
>>>> +		return;
>>>> +
>>>> +	while (i--) {
>>>> +		if (par->genpd_links[i])
>>>> +			device_link_del(par->genpd_links[i]);
>>>> +
>>>> +		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(par->genpds[i]))
>>>> +			dev_pm_domain_detach(par->genpds[i], true);
>>>> +	}
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int simplefb_attach_genpds(struct simplefb_par *par,
>>>> +				  struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> +	unsigned int i;
>>>> +	int err;
>>>> +
>>>> +	err = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
>>>> +					 "#power-domain-cells");
>>>> +	if (err < 0) {
>>>> +		dev_info(dev, "failed to parse power-domains: %d\n", err);
>>>> +		return err;
>>>
>>> This error path is taken when there is no power-domains property in the
>>> device tree with err = -ENOENT.
>>>
>>> Strangely, this does not suppress the error like the next if statement,
>>> even though it is possible that nothing is wrong.
>>>
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	par->num_genpds = err;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * Single power-domain devices are handled by the driver core, so
>>>> +	 * nothing to do here.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	if (par->num_genpds <= 1)
>>>> +		return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	par->genpds = devm_kcalloc(dev, par->num_genpds, sizeof(*par->genpds),
>>>> +				   GFP_KERNEL);
>>> <snip>
>>>> @@ -518,6 +607,10 @@ static int simplefb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>>>  		goto error_clocks;
>>>>  
>>>> +	ret = simplefb_attach_genpds(par, pdev);
>>>> +	if (ret < 0)
>>>> +		goto error_regulators;
>>>
>>> With the error case specified above, not specifying power-domains (which
>>> is valid according to dtschema) causes the entire driver to fail
>>> whenever there are no power domains in the device tree.
>>>
>>> On google-sargo, this causes a bug where the framebuffer fails to probe:
>>>
>>>     [    0.409290] simple-framebuffer 9c000000.framebuffer: failed to parse power-domains: -2
>>>     [    0.409340] simple-framebuffer: probe of 9c000000.framebuffer failed with error -2
>>
>> Ok so this is a problem, sorry for not catching this during review.
>>
>> I believe that this should be fixed by changing the code to:
>>
>> 	err = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
>> 					 "#power-domain-cells");
>> 	if (err < 0) {
>> 		if (err == -ENOENT)
>> 			return 0;
>>
>> 		dev_info(dev, "failed to parse power-domains: %d\n", err);
>> 		return err;
>> 	}
>>
>> Can you submit a (tested) patch fixing this? Then I'll push it
>> to drm-misc-next right away.
> 
> Okay, will do. If my above response changes the preferred fix, let me
> know.

Please move ahead with the proposed fixed, thank you.

> Thank you for committing to having this fixed.

You're welcome.

Regards,

Hans




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add support for generic power-domains
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:42:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e7a7b77-9104-4141-b8a9-3caca05416dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZV1E1aigUFcLceWK@radian>

Hi,

On 11/22/23 01:01, Richard Acayan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:01:18AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/21/23 02:17, Richard Acayan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 06:20:17PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> The simple-framebuffer device tree bindings document the power-domains
>>>> property, so make sure that simplefb supports it. This ensures that the
>>>> power domains remain enabled as long as simplefb is active.
>>>>
>>>> v2: - remove unnecessary call to simplefb_detach_genpds() since that's
>>>>       already done automatically by devres
>>>>     - fix crash if power-domains property is missing in DT
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> index 18025f34fde7..fe682af63827 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>>>  #include <linux/of_clk.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/parser.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>>>  
>>>>  static const struct fb_fix_screeninfo simplefb_fix = {
>>>> @@ -78,6 +79,11 @@ struct simplefb_par {
>>>>  	unsigned int clk_count;
>>>>  	struct clk **clks;
>>>>  #endif
>>>> +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>>>> +	unsigned int num_genpds;
>>>
>>> This is the cause of the crash that occurred on the older patch series.
>>> The field is unsigned, a deviation from v6.6:drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c.
>>>
>>> Instead of making it signed, this version emits an error whenever the
>>> count is negative.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you are trying to say here ?
> 
> In v1 of the patch, there was no error propagation from of_count_phandle_with_args
> and this field was directly assigned to the return value. This was a
> problem (the "crash" as mentioned in this patch's changelog) when the
> return value is negative, since unsigned integers cannot hold negative
> values. On mainstream architectures, the driver would believe that there
> is an absurd amount of power domains.
> 
> I compared the versions of this patch and figured that the fix to the
> crash was more error handling.
> 
> Basically, if "unsigned" was removed, the error handling for the call to
> of_count_phandle_with_args could be dropped with few consequences.

I see, thank you for explaining.

I believe that actually handling the error is better then storing
a negative value, so I believe that the fix in v2 is correct.

>>>> +	struct device **genpds;
>>>> +	struct device_link **genpd_links;
>>>> +#endif
>>>>  #if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_REGULATOR
>>>>  	bool regulators_enabled;
>>>>  	u32 regulator_count;
>>>> @@ -432,6 +438,89 @@ static void simplefb_regulators_enable(struct simplefb_par *par,
>>>>  static void simplefb_regulators_destroy(struct simplefb_par *par) { }
>>>>  #endif
>>>>  
>>>> +#if defined CONFIG_OF && defined CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>>>> +static void simplefb_detach_genpds(void *res)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct simplefb_par *par = res;
>>>> +	unsigned int i = par->num_genpds;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (par->num_genpds <= 1)
>>>> +		return;
>>>> +
>>>> +	while (i--) {
>>>> +		if (par->genpd_links[i])
>>>> +			device_link_del(par->genpd_links[i]);
>>>> +
>>>> +		if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(par->genpds[i]))
>>>> +			dev_pm_domain_detach(par->genpds[i], true);
>>>> +	}
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int simplefb_attach_genpds(struct simplefb_par *par,
>>>> +				  struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> +	unsigned int i;
>>>> +	int err;
>>>> +
>>>> +	err = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
>>>> +					 "#power-domain-cells");
>>>> +	if (err < 0) {
>>>> +		dev_info(dev, "failed to parse power-domains: %d\n", err);
>>>> +		return err;
>>>
>>> This error path is taken when there is no power-domains property in the
>>> device tree with err = -ENOENT.
>>>
>>> Strangely, this does not suppress the error like the next if statement,
>>> even though it is possible that nothing is wrong.
>>>
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	par->num_genpds = err;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * Single power-domain devices are handled by the driver core, so
>>>> +	 * nothing to do here.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	if (par->num_genpds <= 1)
>>>> +		return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	par->genpds = devm_kcalloc(dev, par->num_genpds, sizeof(*par->genpds),
>>>> +				   GFP_KERNEL);
>>> <snip>
>>>> @@ -518,6 +607,10 @@ static int simplefb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>>>  		goto error_clocks;
>>>>  
>>>> +	ret = simplefb_attach_genpds(par, pdev);
>>>> +	if (ret < 0)
>>>> +		goto error_regulators;
>>>
>>> With the error case specified above, not specifying power-domains (which
>>> is valid according to dtschema) causes the entire driver to fail
>>> whenever there are no power domains in the device tree.
>>>
>>> On google-sargo, this causes a bug where the framebuffer fails to probe:
>>>
>>>     [    0.409290] simple-framebuffer 9c000000.framebuffer: failed to parse power-domains: -2
>>>     [    0.409340] simple-framebuffer: probe of 9c000000.framebuffer failed with error -2
>>
>> Ok so this is a problem, sorry for not catching this during review.
>>
>> I believe that this should be fixed by changing the code to:
>>
>> 	err = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains",
>> 					 "#power-domain-cells");
>> 	if (err < 0) {
>> 		if (err == -ENOENT)
>> 			return 0;
>>
>> 		dev_info(dev, "failed to parse power-domains: %d\n", err);
>> 		return err;
>> 	}
>>
>> Can you submit a (tested) patch fixing this? Then I'll push it
>> to drm-misc-next right away.
> 
> Okay, will do. If my above response changes the preferred fix, let me
> know.

Please move ahead with the proposed fixed, thank you.

> Thank you for committing to having this fixed.

You're welcome.

Regards,

Hans




  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-22  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-01 17:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add missing simple-framebuffer features Thierry Reding
2023-11-01 17:20 ` Thierry Reding
2023-11-01 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fbdev/simplefb: Support memory-region property Thierry Reding
2023-11-01 17:20   ` Thierry Reding
2023-11-01 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add support for generic power-domains Thierry Reding
2023-11-01 17:20   ` Thierry Reding
2023-11-21  1:17   ` Richard Acayan
2023-11-21  1:17     ` Richard Acayan
2023-11-21  9:01     ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-21  9:01       ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-22  0:01       ` Richard Acayan
2023-11-22  0:01         ` Richard Acayan
2023-11-22  8:42         ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2023-11-22  8:42           ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-01 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add missing simple-framebuffer features Hans de Goede
2023-11-01 17:54   ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-02 10:54   ` Hans de Goede
2023-11-02 10:54     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e7a7b77-9104-4141-b8a9-3caca05416dd@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailingradian@gmail.com \
    --cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.