Re: [RFT PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: add unit address to DWC3 node wrapper in Exynos5433

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: replicant@osuosl.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
	"Martin Jücker" <martin.juecker@gmail.com>,
	"Henrik Grimler" <henrik@grimler.se>,
	"Sam Protsenko" <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
	"Chanho Park" <chanho61.park@samsung.com>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: add unit address to DWC3 node wrapper in Exynos5433
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:24:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fc8863b-a378-1ccd-982d-6e44013d97c8@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127211527.260060-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

On 27/01/2023 22:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Neither simple-bus bindings nor dtc W=1 accept device nodes in soc@ node
> which do not have unit address.  Therefore usethe address space
> of child device (actual DWC3 Controller) as the wrapper's address to
> fix:
> 
>   exynos5433-tm2e.dtb: soc@0: usbdrd: {'compatible': ['samsung,exynos5433-dwusb3'], ...
>     should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. New patch
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> index 9da24fe958a3..0fca783979f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> @@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ hsi2c_11: i2c@14df0000 {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> -		usbdrd30: usbdrd {
> +		usbdrd30: usb@15400000 {
>  			compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-dwusb3";
>  			clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBDRD30>,
>  				<&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBDRD30>,
> @@ -1751,16 +1751,16 @@ usbdrd30: usbdrd {
>  			clock-names = "aclk", "susp_clk", "phyclk", "pipe_pclk";
>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>  			#size-cells = <1>;
> -			ranges;
> +			ranges = <0x0 0x15400000 0x10000>;
>  			status = "disabled";
>  
> -			usbdrd_dwc3: usb@15400000 {
> +			usbdrd_dwc3: usb@0 {
>  				compatible = "snps,dwc3";
>  				clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBDRD30>,
>  					<&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBDRD30>,
>  					<&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBDRD30>;
>  				clock-names = "ref", "bus_early", "suspend";
> -				reg = <0x15400000 0x10000>;
> +				reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
>  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 231 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  				phys = <&usbdrd30_phy 0>, <&usbdrd30_phy 1>;
>  				phy-names = "usb2-phy", "usb3-phy";
> @@ -1795,7 +1795,7 @@ usbhost30_phy: phy@15580000 {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> -		usbhost30: usbhost {
> +		usbhost30: usb@15a00000 {
>  			compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-dwusb3";
>  			clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBHOST30>,
>  				<&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBHOST30>,
> @@ -1804,16 +1804,16 @@ usbhost30: usbhost {
>  			clock-names = "aclk", "susp_clk", "phyclk", "pipe_pclk";
>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>  			#size-cells = <1>;
> -			ranges;
> +			ranges <0x0 0x15a00000 0x10000>;

This does not even build...

Best regards,
Krzysztof