All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	has <has@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:15:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42960ede-9355-1277-9a6f-4eac3c22365c@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009152618.33b45c2d@cakuba.netronome.com>

Hello Jakub,

On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
>> dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
>> 5.00a [2].
>>
>> Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
>>
>> Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
>>
>> [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
>> [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> 
> Applied to net-next.

This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:

  @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {

The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:

  @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {

I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
change for the correct variant.

Cheers,
Ahmad


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	has <has@pengutronix.de>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:15:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42960ede-9355-1277-9a6f-4eac3c22365c@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009152618.33b45c2d@cakuba.netronome.com>

Hello Jakub,

On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
>> dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
>> 5.00a [2].
>>
>> Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
>>
>> Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
>>
>> [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
>> [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> 
> Applied to net-next.

This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:

  @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {

The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:

  @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {

I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
change for the correct variant.

Cheers,
Ahmad


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-07 15:43 [PATCH] ptp: fix typo of "mechanism" in Kconfig help text Antonio Borneo
2019-10-07 15:43 ` [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix typo of "mechanism" in comment Antonio Borneo
2019-10-07 15:43   ` Antonio Borneo
2019-10-07 15:43 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix length of PTP clock's name string Antonio Borneo
2019-10-07 15:43   ` Antonio Borneo
2019-10-09 23:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-09 23:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-07 15:43 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix disabling flexible PPS output Antonio Borneo
2019-10-07 15:43   ` Antonio Borneo
2019-10-09 23:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-09 23:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-07 15:43 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a Antonio Borneo
2019-10-07 15:43   ` Antonio Borneo
2019-10-09 22:26   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-09 22:26     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 14:15     ` Ahmad Fatoum [this message]
2020-11-24 14:15       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 14:23       ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 14:23         ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 18:20         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 18:20           ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 18:27           ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 18:27             ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 18:56             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 18:56               ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 14:27       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 14:27         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 22:37       ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 22:37         ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-25 10:55         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-25 10:55           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-25 19:26         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-25 19:26           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-07 19:04 ` [PATCH] ptp: fix typo of "mechanism" in Kconfig help text David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42960ede-9355-1277-9a6f-4eac3c22365c@pengutronix.de \
    --to=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=antonio.borneo@st.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=has@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.