Re: [PATCH 0/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add missing simple-framebuffer features

From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fbdev/simplefb: Add missing simple-framebuffer features
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:09:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45ggpbow7usira6hqyelygyuf2lezbngdyecfk27fvukrlnyjk@rh7we3gszj5r> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmvjovlk.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:38:31AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:38:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >> This contains two patches that bring simplefb up to feature parity with
> >> simpledrm. The patches add support for the "memory-region" property that
> >> provides an alternative to the "reg" property to describe the memory
> >> used for the framebuffer and allow attaching the simple-framebuffer
> >> device to one or more generic power domains to make sure they aren't
> >> turned off during the boot process and take down the display
> >> configuration.
> >
> > I just talked with Sima about it in the hallway at XDC. I'm fine with
> > those patches in principle, but it looks to me that simpledrm doesn't
> > have support for power domains and we'll want that :)
> >
> 
> It has support since commit 61df9ca23107 ("drm/simpledrm: Add support for
> multiple "power-domains") AFAIK.

Ah, my bad I didn't look in drm-misc-next

All good then, thanks!
Maxime