From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> To: "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>, "Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>, "Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>, soc@kernel.org, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: configs: Add virtconfig Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:15:52 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <467e7a7f-1703-4f13-8604-6d582e4f9b3e@app.fastmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASRz-apG_pNwvNOqxXy+-tp+WGHV--g6yYU-UQnZx5tgA@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, at 08:37, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 4:54 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> Provide a slimline configuration intended to be booted on virtual >> machines, with the goal of providing a light configuration which will >> boot on and enable features available in mach-virt. This is defined in >> terms of the standard defconfig, with an additional virt.config fragment >> which disables options unneeded in a virtual configuration. >> >> As a first step we just disable all the ARCH_ configuration options, >> disabling the build of all the SoC specific drivers. This results in a >> kernel that builds about 25% faster in my testing, if this approach >> works for people we can add further options. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 ++++++ >> arch/arm64/configs/virt.config | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) I like this a lot, I think that is very helpful and we can always build on top of it later with other fragments. We could still combine this with another Kconfig option that just hides all the real SoC options, which would turn this fragment into a one-line file and avoid having to update it whenever platforms get added. > Yeah, I have a _local_ script to apply > a similar config fragragment. > > When I run QEMU, I disable unneeded CONFIG_ARCH_*, > and also disable unneeded sub-systems. > > Not only me, many people are doing similar in their local env, > I guess. > > > Of course, I will not upstream my set of CONFIG options > since it is just my preference. > After all, this depends on people in my opinion. Do you have an opinion on the other two patches? If those look good to you, maybe I can just merge all three through the soc/defconfig branch for 6.3. Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> To: "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>, "Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>, "Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>, soc@kernel.org, "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: configs: Add virtconfig Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:15:52 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <467e7a7f-1703-4f13-8604-6d582e4f9b3e@app.fastmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASRz-apG_pNwvNOqxXy+-tp+WGHV--g6yYU-UQnZx5tgA@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, at 08:37, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 4:54 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> Provide a slimline configuration intended to be booted on virtual >> machines, with the goal of providing a light configuration which will >> boot on and enable features available in mach-virt. This is defined in >> terms of the standard defconfig, with an additional virt.config fragment >> which disables options unneeded in a virtual configuration. >> >> As a first step we just disable all the ARCH_ configuration options, >> disabling the build of all the SoC specific drivers. This results in a >> kernel that builds about 25% faster in my testing, if this approach >> works for people we can add further options. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 ++++++ >> arch/arm64/configs/virt.config | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) I like this a lot, I think that is very helpful and we can always build on top of it later with other fragments. We could still combine this with another Kconfig option that just hides all the real SoC options, which would turn this fragment into a one-line file and avoid having to update it whenever platforms get added. > Yeah, I have a _local_ script to apply > a similar config fragragment. > > When I run QEMU, I disable unneeded CONFIG_ARCH_*, > and also disable unneeded sub-systems. > > Not only me, many people are doing similar in their local env, > I guess. > > > Of course, I will not upstream my set of CONFIG options > since it is just my preference. > After all, this depends on people in my opinion. Do you have an opinion on the other two patches? If those look good to you, maybe I can just merge all three through the soc/defconfig branch for 6.3. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 15:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-10 19:52 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: configs: Provide slimmed down configuration for guests Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] scripts: merge_config: Add option to suppress warning on overrides Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] kbuild: Provide a version of merge_into_defconfig without override warnings Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: configs: Add virtconfig Mark Brown 2023-02-10 19:52 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-11 7:37 ` Masahiro Yamada 2023-02-11 7:37 ` Masahiro Yamada 2023-02-11 23:10 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-11 23:10 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-13 15:15 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message] 2023-02-13 15:15 ` Arnd Bergmann 2023-02-13 15:48 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-13 15:48 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-13 16:18 ` Masahiro Yamada 2023-02-13 16:18 ` Masahiro Yamada 2023-02-10 23:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: configs: Provide slimmed down configuration for guests Mark Brown 2023-02-10 23:51 ` Mark Brown 2023-02-13 19:30 ` patchwork-bot+linux-soc
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=467e7a7f-1703-4f13-8604-6d582e4f9b3e@app.fastmail.com \ --to=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \ --cc=nathan@kernel.org \ --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \ --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=soc@kernel.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.